Invicta_Toon

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/t..._ct/6288771.stm

in the premiership thought it would be obvious like...

got a link to the protest thread you undoubtedly started?

the shame eating away at you is it?

yep ever so annoyed now China want to try it out as usual

James Solano Ehiog Pressley Neville? ???? Reyna Speed Giggs Sheringham Cole

the next Leeds FACT p.s. have you seen where Leeds are now?

The Daily Mail seem to be cleverly spinning against us recently wonder if they're on FF's blacklist

the worst in my experience is a smallish company (50 or so), big enough to have an HR dept, but nasty and competitive with it (as opposed to massive and having to involve numerous anonymous people in an 'investigation' in that case, given direct evidence (i.e. shopped by a coleague, seen by a manager other than you line manager, or spotted using monitoring software) HR will override the line manager and productivity will never come into it. Like I say, the last thing they want is someone seemingly getting treated differently just because they are an efficient worker (HR don't understand what real work is really about, they are basically jobsworths) my point is, whatever the punishment or action, viewing a forum would be an equal offence to accidentaly seeing a pair of tits, be it a warning or whatever

rubbish, he was mint for UKTV WC commentary. Had that on instead of the regular shite tbh. And he knew more about the players involved Whatever floats your boat mate. Did you actually see any of his WC podcasts though or are you dismissing my commend on them on account of his UKTV commentary? no and yes podcasts are for teenagers and their fancy gadgets

was he not on the pitch at the time? What's with the dandy body warmer

Zidane MkII

you missed out 2 are known terrorists (although technically not members) that's what threw me

rubbish, he was mint for UKTV WC commentary. Had that on instead of the regular shite tbh. And he knew more about the players involved

it's a product of a deal between FIFA and the EU not a very long time ago

and the world cup, and sky, and something else I can't recall

Northumbria Police? League Managers Association? Honorable Company of Armourers?

I'm unpwnable tbh hence why they must collude to bin me on some jumped up charge. I have yet to obtain your N-O teflon status mind, but I see that as a step too far in sacrificing my principles and integrity

ask HR if you can see your workplace acceptable internet use policy, I think you'll be surprised If you don't have one, then you can get sacked for doing anything they don't like, so unless you work at the Chron.... Actually most employers these days use a filtering tool (such as Websense) on their proxy to ban sites by category. HR will specify that certain categories are excluded (adult, gambling, gaming, violence, propaganda, etc) and then all the IT dept to manage the rest who will tend to manage it so that the bandwidth remains within the limits for legitimate business use. We've recently banned Streaming Media sites (YouTube, etc) and Personal Web Space sites (MySpace, etc) as we were maxing out our bandwidth. That alone reduced our usage by 25% An employer will not sack you for browsing a football forum at work, they'd sack you for not actually doing your job and instead browsing the web. So long as your productivity is there, there's no way they'll discipline someone simply for browsing. Besides the point, more of a reason for not allowing images such as a pair of tits is that children can get access to forums such as this and N-O. Yes there is a disclaimer when you register where you have to state you're at least 13 but there is no procedure to prevent minors not registering. More importantly, most forums have the ability to be read even when you're not registered. Rules are rules mate - you knew before you posted that it contravened those set on N-O so you can't really complain... depends where you work... in my experience, if you work in a big enough place to have a HR dept., productivity will never come into it if you are seen to be breaking the rules. No workplace I know allows you to casually browse during work hours for non-work reasons as for the kids, bollocks to that, they can see worse in the Youtube threads for christsakes, or from The Sun pornographic material is exactly that - pornographic last I heard, N-O was not hosted in the Islamic Republic of Iran, although I guess that's what it would take to stop tards like HTT messing with it and again, all of this is moot, as we now know it was GM who reported it, the image having been there for 8 hours, so obviously not that infringing. As the mods can often be found explaining (when not hiding behind anonymous accounts), they would normally take a lenient stance and probably would have let it slide or at most removed it immediately without a ban, but they have to abide by a 'report' sensitive soul that GM is as we all know. Fuck me when I think of all the reporting I could have done in my time on there, maybe I'll just have to lower myself to their level when I return whichever way you cut it, it's bullshit

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/e...onf/6290623.stm you can't keep a good man down as they say

lucky for him I can't get there by 2pm then I would fuck him up tbh, nancy boy that he is

Seconded. No offence like not sure why I would be offended each to their own like

its global dimming you should worry about man, both in an environmental and intellectual sense

never knew micheals shields dad supported west ham

he got reported by the Messiah he's a very naughty boy Artificial intelligence. How very appropriate in your case get fucked kitboy What a comeback suggestions oh wise one? you should always follow a negative comment with a constructve one, that's my philosophy And you would class get fucked as constructive? it's a duality, a masterpiece of philosophical construct