Jump to content

Invicta_Toon

Miserable
  • Posts

    1068
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Invicta_Toon

  1. ma arse. Take at look at his posts, every one about one of mine. It wouldn't be half as funny but he posts nothing else, nothing else at all. Over on N-O he would log in and straight away a post of mine from weeks back would appear with a comment from the music man. The fuckers obsessed
  2. 1. Who the fuck leaked all this info from the FA? 2. As if Moyes would leave it if Roeder came in and apologised 3. Last time I knew, threatening to 'do someone' was more of a crime than calling someone a nigger
  3. well ask her what she thinks about the Horizon thing about global dimming I did at the time I think and posted what she said in the thread on N-O, can't remember what she said though, think it was along the lines of it's effect not being strong enough to counteract global warming anyway. Also, there's much more to climate change than simply global warming, which isn't affected by global dimming at all. I'll have a hunt through N-O and if I can find the post I'll copy it on here for you. Don't really want to ask her again because she's my brother's ex and they only split up recently. doesn't sound right, as it's not counteracting warming, it's making it less of an effect, i.e if global dimming were not happening, global warming would be worse Same difference. errr. no it isn't Anyway, were we talking about that in the "Hawking says we need another planet" thread or what? Can't remember which one it was. no idea
  4. well ask her what she thinks about the Horizon thing about global dimming I did at the time I think and posted what she said in the thread on N-O, can't remember what she said though, think it was along the lines of it's effect not being strong enough to counteract global warming anyway. Also, there's much more to climate change than simply global warming, which isn't affected by global dimming at all. I'll have a hunt through N-O and if I can find the post I'll copy it on here for you. Don't really want to ask her again because she's my brother's ex and they only split up recently. doesn't sound right, as it's not counteracting warming, it's making it less of an effect, i.e if global dimming were not happening, global warming would be worse
  5. what makes you think you would break the habit of a lifetime and post something worth replying to? and by all means keep it up *searches for ignore function*
  6. took verlaine 10 minutes to break: "very dim bulb" - you can't just make this shit up people, you need to be a lyrical genius [/tortured soul] to come up with that tbh
  7. well ask her what she thinks about the Horizon thing about global dimming
  8. well when the fuck did you see me switching? And how long have you been AH on N-O? I've only noticed you in the last few weeks, because of your avatar tbh Really? I'm like a God over there... are you bollocks or are you formerly Pipkin?
  9. well when the fuck did you see me switching? And how long have you been AH on N-O? I've only noticed you in the last few weeks, because of your avatar tbh
  10. she's only just retired gems, late one tonight
  11. so you promise from this day forth to stop cyber stalking me? Believe it when I [don't] see it tbh btw, this counts for forever, you can't do your usual shite of disappearing for a few weeks and reappearing with the same 'patter'
  12. not quite everyone it seems emo-boy Maybe I'm being slow, but wasn't Mark talking about you there? Yeah I was. I was wondering what Vic as on about. well who the fuck are you then? Never fucking heard of you FFS. And I've never switched between boards so you're talking shite btw
  13. not quite everyone it seems emo-boy Maybe I'm being slow, but wasn't Mark talking about you there? well for one, it describes verlaine to a tee, and for another, when the fuck have I ever tried to play it 'cool' on here FFS, and I've never switched between the two boards I came here for the first time after being banned on N-O, a week before N-O went tits up, and there's nothing to go back to FFS, so excuse me, but I can't see it. It would help if I knew who Mark was tbh, there's plenty of randoms on here I've never even heard of that seem to have an opinion on me
  14. mmm... not quite everyone it seems emo-boy you lecturing on popularity? that's a fucking laugh. Here's a word in your shell like, popularity means nothing on a message board you stupid wank. Unless that is of course your some socially stunted wannabe emotionaly scarred useless fucking wet dream of a failed musician that is, then of course it would probably seem quite important again, shut it you emo tit loving the PM btw: Tell me what was in that that needed stay private? Or are you scared you might become less popular when people really do see that 'your patter is shite' and repetive unimaginative boring shite to boot. You are supposed to be a creative person aren't you?
  15. but you're not obsessed with me though oh no otherwise you would follow me round like a little boy lost posting shite, although I notice others haven't joined in with mutual cock rubbing this time. Perhaps they get the joke just fucking do one you irritating shite
  16. recent history would suggest they are NOT stupid but very sharp indeed - I do liek the idea of them offering the Sun a chance to sponsor them mind.................................. recent history suggests that Dubai Investments could actually do it tbh have a look at some of the economic stats for Dubai, out of this world
  17. Do what the voices tell you. that kitten is boss eyed FFS
  18. it's a planetary issue that needs planetary action, that's why I find it ridiculous that people think it can be changed in the here and now however, it is naive to think that humans can't and won't adapt or produce solutions if and when they need them so let's just leave it tbh, let Parky's daughter get it sorted when she becomes Earth President
  19. oi Shinton, where did you get your avatar, you pilfering Shields dwellwer. Excuse me, I've had that for some time. I believe I had it before you. If not I'm not that much bothered because I'm due a change. oh by the way FUCK OFF Shields dweller is it supposed to be moving or what?
  20. I could wipe your ass with my grammer. When I choose to use coloqualisms there is a reason. I hope those spelling mistakes are intentional. Yes it's probably double ll. She may have been referring to "grammer". you gotta love the craic though haven't you Parky ?
  21. it was ironic just like the afformentioned people jumping in here complainging about the lack of craic (whatever that fucking means)
  22. Nothing about the Ozone layer in that. Since the use of CFCs has been globally banned, the hole should recover, although it will take time. A classic example of how good science and political will power can prevent catastrophe. The hole in the ozone layer is presently only of concern to penguin dermatologists and their patients. go back to my original post, I wasn't talking about the ozone layer You said: You've repeated the connection several times since. And you have the hypocrisy to claim "greens" (whatever that umbrella term means) don't understand the science behind global warming, yet you somehow do, based on some very controversial viewpoints that were the subject of a Horizons program. I've never discussed anything with you but have you sussed I think. You're happy to pretend you're knowledgable in a subject, spout complete ungrounded nonsense, then just deny it when you are exposed for what you are. Hope HTT gets N-O up and running asap. all right I got the 2 things mixed up, but tbh I was going on a recolection of that program which was ages ago, and no I don't have a doctorate in global warming but unless you do, keep your childish insults to yourself My orignal point still stands that by decreasing pollution will actually make things worse. What is there in that article that you don't agree with? And don't give me any shit about the accepted opinion of science, a cursory knowledge knows it only takes 1 paper to change the entire body of scientific knowledge on a subject, often decades after the paper is published And also, on a minor point, as I also said, we have not repaired the layer (because it's impossible), it is repairing itself. As you rightly point out you have no knowledge of my background or experience, but if you want to get into a pissing contest I'll be happy to oblige Childish insults? Pointing out you were wrong on a VERY basic matter you mean? Basically, you have shown yourself to be completely ignorant on the subject of global warming. As such I don't think you have the ability to critically appraise that Horizon program or any other literature or media on the subject for that matter. Yet you still have the nerve to accuse "Greens" of not knowing what they are talking about. I'll know to avoid you in the future though, thanks for verifying that. gee I might cry could you fucking backtrack any faster? just say what you don't agree with in the article, or I'll get the University to take back your doctorate in climate change It's the opinion of a small group of scientists ffs, not being a climatologist (but knowing some basics) myself I don't really have much of an opinion on it, and neither should you really. I'm certainly not going to watch a program on the TV (Horizons ffs) and pretend I'm some world authority and that the mainstream climatologists are all wrong though. finally you admit you're not a climatologist then I didn't say I was a world authority, I merely put up credible evidence against the prevailing scientific and green opinion, based on scientific fact and not beautiful planet ideology. I even added 'make of it what you will' to make it clear I was offering information not opinion, but if semantics defeat you we really shouldn't continue Nice to see my point about mainstream scientific belief passed you by though
  23. Nothing about the Ozone layer in that. Since the use of CFCs has been globally banned, the hole should recover, although it will take time. A classic example of how good science and political will power can prevent catastrophe. The hole in the ozone layer is presently only of concern to penguin dermatologists and their patients. go back to my original post, I wasn't talking about the ozone layer You said: You've repeated the connection several times since. And you have the hypocrisy to claim "greens" (whatever that umbrella term means) don't understand the science behind global warming, yet you somehow do, based on some very controversial viewpoints that were the subject of a Horizons program. I've never discussed anything with you but have you sussed I think. You're happy to pretend you're knowledgable in a subject, spout complete ungrounded nonsense, then just deny it when you are exposed for what you are. Hope HTT gets N-O up and running asap. all right I got the 2 things mixed up, but tbh I was going on a recolection of that program which was ages ago, and no I don't have a doctorate in global warming but unless you do, keep your childish insults to yourself My orignal point still stands that by decreasing pollution will actually make things worse. What is there in that article that you don't agree with? And don't give me any shit about the accepted opinion of science, a cursory knowledge knows it only takes 1 paper to change the entire body of scientific knowledge on a subject, often decades after the paper is published And also, on a minor point, as I also said, we have not repaired the layer (because it's impossible), it is repairing itself. As you rightly point out you have no knowledge of my background or experience, but if you want to get into a pissing contest I'll be happy to oblige Childish insults? Pointing out you were wrong on a VERY basic matter you mean? Basically, you have shown yourself to be completely ignorant on the subject of global warming. As such I don't think you have the ability to critically appraise that Horizon program or any other literature or media on the subject for that matter. Yet you still have the nerve to accuse "Greens" of not knowing what they are talking about. I'll know to avoid you in the future though, thanks for verifying that. gee I might cry could you fucking backtrack any faster? just say what you don't agree with in the article, or I'll get the University to take back your doctorate in climate change I'm pretty sure Renton isn't backtracking. The story so far is that you fundamentally misunderstood the causes of global warming. no, I made a point which I mixed up with another point, because I don't carry this shit around in my head 24/7 (just not concerned in a Parky stylee tbh), but the main point I was making still stands unchallenged, and no amount of bullshit from Rentboy changes that fact
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.