Jump to content

wykikitoon

Legend
  • Posts

    35364
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30

Everything posted by wykikitoon

  1. That's still being investigated. Hmm is this why he is "injured"
  2. Hehe I love the BBC text commentry 1749: Cristiano Ronaldo gets a great standing ovation from the home fans as he comes off to be replaced by Gabriel Heinze. Actually, that's a lie. The Portugal winger is booed off, as expected.
  3. wykikitoon

    Ricky Hatton

    Well done Hatton. Barton was on Soccer AM yesterday, said Hatton goes down to the training ground a lot but they wont let him join in incase he chins em hehe
  4. So we shouldn't sign players anymore because its not worth it? basically yes, we're shit, and it's not down to the current players Who the fuck is it down to then? Man you are one herion smacked up freak mate.
  5. Yes, its due to us not buying well. Your saying keep hold of Duff because we need cover, fair enough. Ask yourself, how badly have we missed him compared to us missing Given? Not a lot at all. Duff, like has been said isnt needed if £7m is on the table, if £7m isnt on the table then keep him? We need the money to buy players in key positions.
  6. I think its you who isnt getting it mate. Duff isnt needed IMO as we have adequate cover. We could use the money which is a lot for someone who, like I say has been ineffective and injured a lot this season, on bolstering our defence. Not to mention what Duff will be on wages etc, surley it makes business sense to make a profit and at the end of the day,that is what NUFC are. We seriousley need to sort our defence out and using the Duff money wisely by Roeder then we can start to plug the MASSIVE void that we have been crying out for, for many, many seasons and start thinking bout FA & League cups?
  7. A Young lad who has a lot of football ahead of him and Duff? Doesnt make good buiness sense, well unless £15m comes in for him. Zog doesn't have the right attitude IMO. Always mortal on a Saturday night. Allegedly
  8. I know what you mean about having a limited squad. I would like to see him stay and play well, but tbh I had forgotten about him until the other day when the BBC showed a side with the crocks missing. If we can get £7m for him, IMO we should get rid and put the money to use in much needed areas. and what exactly are those areas? positions where in the past we had perfectly fucking adequate players until they were sold for a bastard pittance seriously? no one sees a link between this revolving door policy and our shit squad profile? Left back, Right back and Centre backs Havent you seen our defence recently? "Fucking adequate players?" Like whom in our defence has been adequate since Woody? Would even argue Woodgate wasn't adequate, more than enough quality but we couldn't afford to keep a defender who played so little. Aye but when he did play he was more than adequate, I for one was with FFS on the selling of him at the pricee when it came in because of his horendous (sp) injuries so now he's playing in the Premiership and we have Ramage would he even have reached the end of his contract with us by now? Who knows really. We got a good price for a crock and we didnt use the money wisely to strength then a still poor defence. We now have a possible opportunity to make money on a player (which doenst happen a lot nowadays) that has been injured and ineffective for a lot of the season. So IMO we sell him and use the money wisely in shring up a shocking and possibley the worse defence in the top flight! But then again according to you we need cover in the midfield more
  9. A Young lad who has a lot of football ahead of him and Duff? Doesnt make good buiness sense, well unless £15m comes in for him.
  10. I know what you mean about having a limited squad. I would like to see him stay and play well, but tbh I had forgotten about him until the other day when the BBC showed a side with the crocks missing. If we can get £7m for him, IMO we should get rid and put the money to use in much needed areas. and what exactly are those areas? positions where in the past we had perfectly fucking adequate players until they were sold for a bastard pittance seriously? no one sees a link between this revolving door policy and our shit squad profile? Left back, Right back and Centre backs Havent you seen our defence recently? "Fucking adequate players?" Like whom in our defence has been adequate since Woody? Would even argue Woodgate wasn't adequate, more than enough quality but we couldn't afford to keep a defender who played so little. Aye but when he did play he was more than adequate, I for one was with FFS on the selling of him at the pricee when it came in because of his horendous (sp) injuries
  11. I think Man U have been very lucky with injuries though and although i hate Chelsea,i hate Man U as much as anyone and hope they win fuck all.I know far too many gloating,patronising,glory hunting twatts and they will be unbearable if they win it.Its nice to see them with a sulk on. Aye they have, thats one of my points I was trying to put across about Ronaldo. But there is still a long way to go.
  12. I know what you mean about having a limited squad. I would like to see him stay and play well, but tbh I had forgotten about him until the other day when the BBC showed a side with the crocks missing. If we can get £7m for him, IMO we should get rid and put the money to use in much needed areas. and what exactly are those areas? positions where in the past we had perfectly fucking adequate players until they were sold for a bastard pittance seriously? no one sees a link between this revolving door policy and our shit squad profile? Left back, Right back and Centre backs Havent you seen our defence recently? "Fucking adequate players?" Like whom in our defence has been adequate since Woody?
  13. Aye its a pain in the arse that saying. I dont normally intend to get pished when I go out it just happens every now and then.
  14. I know what you mean about having a limited squad. I would like to see him stay and play well, but tbh I had forgotten about him until the other day when the BBC showed a side with the crocks missing. If we can get £7m for him, IMO we should get rid and put the money to use in much needed areas.
  15. If Man Ure didnt have Ronaldo firing in the goals they would be in trouble IMO. Rooney has been poor this season with regards to the goals status. To the question, it would be nice if Arsenal won it but I dont think they can, I would therefore like Man Ure to win it. Around crimbo time I still thought that Chelsea would kick it up a gear and they would win but nee chance now.
  16. They showed it ion Soccer AM yesterday, madness!
  17. Chelsea wont let him go until the end of the season, not with their injury problems.
  18. Indeed, but I think we need another mid first
  19. we won't be signing him then You mean we WILL if he is injured
  20. Should never have got rid tbh. you joking? he was terrible. Well had he scored for us today instead of CHarlton, we'd be winning, FACT. bit of a tenuous theory there....if he had been still at Newcastle, he would be injured therefore not playing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.