Jump to content

Bond 22


RlCO
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 4 months later...

thought the last film was miles better that owt they chucked oot over the previous 15 years. Maybe i'm the only one to appreciate the finer qualities of watching someone smash the shite out of a baddies face using a sink

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the title is crap...........quarter of cola cubes...hmmm....no.............pensioners portion of chips and a nice bit of haddock................hmmm......no.....................hang on i've got a corker............etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really enjoyed Casino Royale but fully understand why a lot of "Bond" fans didn't. The James Bond we've become accustomed to is the rather camp silly spy, one step up from XXX but not close to being as gritty and realistic* as the likes of Jason Bourne.

 

If you like utterly retarded silliness then CR is not going to be your type of film. Now I enjoyed the Connery and Brosnan Bonds, but even they were a bit ridiculous (riding a motorbike off a cliff, catching a plummeting Cessna and being able to climb in, get set and pull it out of a nose dive.. all before hitting the floor or pesky outcrops).

 

Casino Royale was obviously jumping on the more brutal fight scenes shown in Jason Bourne, it's trying a more grown up Bond and I for one enjoyed it. There's still silliness, there's still the girls and there's still good action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last Bond film was the best in a very, very long time, and I loved Golden Eye.

 

The trailer hasn't got me as excited as the previous one did but if it's half as good as Casino Royale i'll be very happy.

 

EDIR: And the name is gay as ferk.

Edited by Ketsbaia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really enjoyed Casino Royale but fully understand why a lot of "Bond" fans didn't. The James Bond we've become accustomed to is the rather camp silly spy, one step up from XXX but not close to being as gritty and realistic* as the likes of Jason Bourne.

 

If you like utterly retarded silliness then CR is not going to be your type of film. Now I enjoyed the Connery and Brosnan Bonds, but even they were a bit ridiculous (riding a motorbike off a cliff, catching a plummeting Cessna and being able to climb in, get set and pull it out of a nose dive.. all before hitting the floor or pesky outcrops).

 

Casino Royale was obviously jumping on the more brutal fight scenes shown in Jason Bourne, it's trying a more grown up Bond and I for one enjoyed it. There's still silliness, there's still the girls and there's still good action.

 

 

The thing I liked about Daniel Craig's Bond is he's the more realistic. The only Bond novel i've read is Casino Royale and that was prior to the last film and really he's the only recent Bond you can imagine being anything near Ian Fleming's original. After Golden Eye it got a bit daft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really enjoyed Casino Royale but fully understand why a lot of "Bond" fans didn't. The James Bond we've become accustomed to is the rather camp silly spy, one step up from XXX but not close to being as gritty and realistic* as the likes of Jason Bourne.

 

If you like utterly retarded silliness then CR is not going to be your type of film. Now I enjoyed the Connery and Brosnan Bonds, but even they were a bit ridiculous (riding a motorbike off a cliff, catching a plummeting Cessna and being able to climb in, get set and pull it out of a nose dive.. all before hitting the floor or pesky outcrops).

 

Casino Royale was obviously jumping on the more brutal fight scenes shown in Jason Bourne, it's trying a more grown up Bond and I for one enjoyed it. There's still silliness, there's still the girls and there's still good action.

 

 

The thing I liked about Daniel Craig's Bond is he's the more realistic. The only Bond novel i've read is Casino Royale and that was prior to the last film and really he's the only recent Bond you can imagine being anything near Ian Fleming's original. After Golden Eye it got a bit daft.

Because the Microlite(sp?) coming out of the fake horses arse is something I see every day.

 

Bond's been silly after Dr No to be fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really enjoyed Casino Royale but fully understand why a lot of "Bond" fans didn't. The James Bond we've become accustomed to is the rather camp silly spy, one step up from XXX but not close to being as gritty and realistic* as the likes of Jason Bourne.

 

If you like utterly retarded silliness then CR is not going to be your type of film. Now I enjoyed the Connery and Brosnan Bonds, but even they were a bit ridiculous (riding a motorbike off a cliff, catching a plummeting Cessna and being able to climb in, get set and pull it out of a nose dive.. all before hitting the floor or pesky outcrops).

 

Casino Royale was obviously jumping on the more brutal fight scenes shown in Jason Bourne, it's trying a more grown up Bond and I for one enjoyed it. There's still silliness, there's still the girls and there's still good action.

 

 

Have to agree with you and Skol, the last Bond is the First one I've enjoyed in a long time, but I'm a massive fan of the Bourne trilogy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.