The Fish

There was a pub by Leeds Uni called the Library.

Would it be considered a good window if our league performance is good enough to have us in contention for 4th and we're able to bring in reinforcements in January that would have been out of reach had we spent £65m on Guehi? Not being a dick, genuinely want to know your thoughts.

Sensational stuff from the stadium announcer.

36 And Hope is just a clickbait bitch.

Yeah, people are praising Man Utd for their window, when in reality we don't know how Yoro will fare, if Zirkzee can be relied upon, and so on. Liverpool have only signed Chiesa (a notable crock) and so we don't know how they'd cope with an injury crisis. There are too many unknowables right now and it'll probably take to the January window to learn whether the business done has been impressive or just papering over the cracks?

No, but I was advocating for selling Willock. Imagine what we could have done with the £20-£30m we got for him. Maybe a better P.A. system at Stack?

That's my point though, we don't want to sell the stars, and we can't sell the fringe players. So where does that leave us? We have to inflate the PSR envelope by signing commercial deals and offloading from the wage bill. Those are both more incremental steps, but way more sustainable than trying to cash in on the players who we should be building a dynasty around. I think they messed up this window, by focussing too much on Guehi and not the bigger picture. We needed an athletic, technical right-sided CB. Not Guehi specifcally. If there were none available at the price we were happy with, then we should have quickly shifted focus to another area of the pitch. To fail to do that was shortsighted.

Really good news, he links up with Isak so well.

Well, they are getting more income, but that'll take time. And these stars you speak of? Who exactly could we sell and make good money on? We've tried offloading Almiron in two separate windows, no joy.

If they had any idea how much time I spend dicking about I'd have been unemployed a long time ago, my friend. This is pure top-down thinking. "We've got this space that we're spending a lot of money on, there's no business need for and nobody is using, shall we kill the contract?" "Nah, lets force the plebs to use it" Bravo dickheads, bravo.

Sorry to hear that mate, but it sounds like you were close.

Makes no sense in my particular situation. There's nobody from my team in the Manchester office, it's not even a dedicated office for my company. So I'd be swapping working by myself in my office at home, for working by myself in an openplan space. I won't have two monitors, I can't have some of my calls in public so will have to rearrange the series likely pissing some people off. Another bloke lives an hour from his office, childcare commitments means he can't leave home before 9 and he'll need to leave the office before 4. The same thing with hardly anybody working from that office too. One of these dumbfuck decisions where some overpaid chinless cunt has seen that people aren't using the office they're paying for and instead of just not paying for the office, they're forcing people to go in.

Aren't loads of those yachts owned by people/companies who let them out for holidaying morons? Paying for themselves quick time.

You'll find something mate. If you're too valued to be at risk of redundancy, you're too qualified not to find something else.