Kid Dynamite 9342 Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 You'd have a job finding a Kangaroo in Africa you thick bastard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 4949 Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 You'd have a job finding a Kangaroo in Africa you thick bastard Now I rarely stand up for Des but I think he was implying it is a kangaroo court.However this thinking in itself is out of date and also worthy of derision? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 9342 Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 He will be now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondTUTU 0 Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 You'd have a job finding a Kangaroo in Africa you thick bastard Oh dear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 21, 2014 Author Share Posted March 21, 2014 No idea why the trial needs a two day break. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gejon 2 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 No idea why the trial needs a two day break. The judge needs a shit but doesn't want to give Pistorious a short enough timescale to find out when he goes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inochi 0 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Time to stretch the legs and that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 63312 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Pistorius having to sell his house to pay for legal costs apparently. Would have thought he was worth a bit more than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 21, 2014 Author Share Posted March 21, 2014 Pistorius having to sell his house to pay for legal costs apparently. Would have thought he was worth a bit more than that. His lawyers are really dragging it out as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondTUTU 0 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Once its sold he will probably be out on a limb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 50776 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Pistorius having to sell his house to pay for legal costs apparently. Would have thought he was worth a bit more than that.He'll make it all back ( and then some) with the book and film deals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondTUTU 0 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Not if thokozile mathimba has anything to do with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 9342 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 I know school kids who do that btw. I bet it's been years since you had a lass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondTUTU 0 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Engaged actually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 50776 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 And here's the proof. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, peasants. Etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 39291 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Receipt or bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondTUTU 0 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Funny you should say that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 9342 Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Whatever DesmondTUBUTU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 24, 2014 Author Share Posted March 24, 2014 (edited) Big stuff this morning. The judge finally comes to life and rounds on the defence three or four times in regard to lines of questioning. The judges interjections on wordage and the def use of affidavids against the witness throw the def off their stride significantly. Judge at last breaks cover and bears her teeth. Not good for the defence. Witness sticks to guns regarding screams and shots. If the def can't discredit the screaming then he goes down. Oscar for the first time looks a bit shaken sitting there. Edited March 24, 2014 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catmag 653 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Big stuff this morning. The judge finally comes to life and rounds on the defence three or four times in regard to lines of questioning. The judges interjections on wordage and the def use of affidavids against the witness throw the def off their stride significantly. Judge at last breaks cover and bears her teeth. Not good for the defence. Witness sticks to guns regarding screams and shots. If the def can't discredit the screaming then he goes down. Oscar for the first time looks a bit shaken sitting there. You're missing out the bits where the witness gives evidence that completely contradicts her original sworn affidavid and has to admit she's changed her version of events. It's a complete shambles this morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 63312 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Hey both, it's affidavit. Continue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonasjuice 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Would feel a bit uncomfortable sending a man down for murder on the basis of eye (ear?) witness testimony, it's so unreliable for many reasons and as much as it's been joked about a bit, I imagine if you had just accidentally shot your girlfriend then the scream/wail upon realising would be pretty high pitched and easily mistaken from a different house to be a woman's. I'd guess the case depends on how solid the evidence about time between shots is more than anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 24, 2014 Author Share Posted March 24, 2014 (edited) You're missing out the bits where the witness gives evidence that completely contradicts her original sworn affidavid and has to admit she's changed her version of events. It's a complete shambles this morning. You're in love with him innit? She changed her mind later about wether she saw him walking aroung or not. The other bone of contention is wether the bathroom light was on or not...She stuck to her guns on that...Normal people under pressure mis-remember things and that is taken into account. What's his defence? He didn't warn his girlfriend someone was in the house...Didin't turn the lights on and started blasting away (contrary to his gun license legal justification to use lethal force) through a closed door cause he heard a 'noise'. He might as well move to Hollywood if he gets off this...Top crime writer in the making. None of it adds up. In situations of perceived danger the first thing you check is if your partner is safe and aware of what's happenning. Edited March 24, 2014 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 24, 2014 Author Share Posted March 24, 2014 Revealing text messages between the couple are read out in court by Captain Francois Moller, police mobile phone expert. One from Steenkamp to Pistorius, sent on 19 January 2013, reads: "I am scared of you sometimes, how you snap at me and react to me" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 4949 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 He murdered her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now