Renton 27805 Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 Does anybody say: Jesus H tap dancing christ or have I completely made that up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 63312 Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 Load of bollocks. I'm all for it. It's perfect for expressing profound frustration at someones complete fucking ineptitude or their singular inability to grasp a point that you might be trying to make. And lets face it theres a lot of that goes on on O-N, what with some* of the IQ's struggling to make double figures. Someone also suggested that it was a new phrase too? I'm pretty sure I've heard it all my life though (mainly from my mum when shouting at me ) sammynb...isn't this just cos SLP 'jesus wept'd' you the other day? *Not all, but quite a few-though I hope it doesnt become a critical mass. 14120[/snapback] Yes and no manc. When SLP used at at me the other day yes it pissed me off (and then I got over it) but then I saw how much people use it on N-O. And as someone said it is usually those with single figure IQs whenever someone posts something they disagree with. It just doesn't argue anything except a lack of understanding of the term. You know if people actually wrote: And Jesus wept because you're fucking wrong! Then it would be used correctly. 14806[/snapback] Apparently you didn't...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammynb 4171 Posted August 19, 2005 Author Share Posted August 19, 2005 No I did thanks for your concern though Gemmill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 63312 Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 Yeah I know you did. Definitely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 12390 Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 Jesus wept, is this still going? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 (edited) Right...just to clear this up one last time. The context I used it, and have always used it, is dealing with a sense of humour bypass. I made a joke about N-O (which I still use btw) being down again. It wasn't a dig. If it's any consolation I really like the Mary on a Moped suggestion. Edited August 19, 2005 by sweetleftpeg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 Yeah I know you did. Definitely. 14878[/snapback] We're we not arguing only last week on t'other board about the whoosh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 63312 Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 Yeah I know you did. Definitely. 14878[/snapback] We're we not arguing only last week on t'other board about the whoosh? 15039[/snapback] You've lost (whooshed?) me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 Yeah my grammar can't have helped, sorry! I can't get onto the other board to see - were you not arguing against the use of whooshes last week on NO, or am I mixing you up with another swimming pool? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 63312 Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 No you're right, it was me. Have I inadvertently used it somewhere? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 No, not at all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 Hooray, no-one has posted this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 Hooray, no-one has posted this 28214[/snapback] Bit late tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 No-one else has posted it son. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 No-one else has posted it son. 28467[/snapback] It was still a bit late. tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 No-one else has posted it son. 28467[/snapback] It was still a bit late. tbh 28539[/snapback] Wronger than Roger Wrongerson of Wrongsville. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 12390 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 No-one else has posted it son. 28467[/snapback] It was still a bit late. tbh 28539[/snapback] Wronger than Roger Wrongerson of Wrongsville. 29931[/snapback] Are you? I agree with Alex, was still a bit late......................tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zico martin 113 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 No-one else has posted it son. 28467[/snapback] It was still a bit late. tbh 28539[/snapback] Wronger than Roger Wrongerson of Wrongsville. 29931[/snapback] Are you? I agree with Alex, was still a bit late......................tbh 29969[/snapback] late but integral to what is now the offical jesus wept thread. Admittedly it does look more like 'monkey' in a dressing gown than the son of god but even so! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts