wolfy

I think we're fine on the goalkeeper front, unless a few get itchy feet and want out. I particularly like Elliot as a favourite number 1. I can't see us keeping Krul, Darlow and Elliot though. I can actually see one of them leaving.

Insufficient grasp of what kind of science? Theoretical science? Pseudo-science? Hypothetical science? Or natural science? What don't I grasp that you physically do grasp? If there's anything you can refute from what I say then be my guest. Other than that you're basically telling me nothing and showing me nothing, except your line of thought that I should seek some kind of help for some reason, for posting on a forum. The bit I put in is just what the usual people tend to say when theories don't fit into their mindset or schooled thoughts. Imagine a world where a person cannot have their own opinions, no matter how much they differ from the accepted norm. Oh wait, we actually just about do.

It's in the actual usage of it's energy that pushes the atmosphere out as it takes it in, creating the north and south magnetic fields we are familiar with.

To physically get to it would be impossible, because like I said, it would be like walking towards a magnet factory in a knights armour. Potentially.

The only thing shocking about this post is in the time it took you to get to this stage. I expected you to come in with this carry on well before you did. Not to worry though...you managed it in the end.

Tell me who the physical scientists are that prove what we've all be coaxed into accepting?

The sun you see in the sky is a reflection. It's not a physical thing. The real energy you see is from the centre. The moon and all other fixed sky lights you see are all part of the set up of reflected energy. Oh and yeah, I know how mad it sounds, but yet people believe in a 850,000 mile diameter ball of nuclear fusion that is 93 million miles away from Earth as we move around in in some kind of wobbling elliptical motion and always having the stars follow suit. This sounds normal because we've been trained to accept it as normal, when ...to be honest...when thought about fully, it becomes what it is. Nonsense, as far as I'm concerned.

Who's work am I dismissing? I'm just a pissant on a forum with my very own hypothesis. How can I destroy any esteemed scientists thoughts or work? If what theoretical scientists tell you, is a truth and you accept it for whatever reason, then you can live your entire life with that belief and argue against people like me by using their work. The issue is in the fact that you are using their work to argue something you do not know is legitimately correct but mass opinion backs you up, so who am I in all this? I'm just a retarded pissant who sits in his mothers basement with egg yolk and gravy down my top, with a big mat of greasy hair. I'm fine with all of that but it still does not make you correct.

The radiation is all around you. It's called vibration/friction of matter and is always radiating you. The minute you stop receiving radiation, you freeze to death.

That's fine.

Yeah well, I'm not declaring my stuff as gospel. I'm putting my theories forward for people to muse over, or call me a nut. Am I the only arrogant one by sticking to my thoughts or are you arrogant in telling me I'm wrong because you've been arrogantly told to follow something from which you legitimately have no clue about as to being a reality. We could all declare anything as a truth but proving it is the crux of the matter and none of us can physically prove any of what we are talking about. The hardest part is people admitting to it.

It's not a planet as far as I'm concerned and also it is a closed system, so obviously it won't gain nor lose any mass. When you burn fuel you are decreasing the mass by spreading out the contents of the density of that mass. Those contents are then spread out, but if gathered back up (theoretically) you would lose nothing and the mass would be once again, back to normal. When a river flows it still ends up as the same mass once it hits ocean, except it's dispersed among it. When water turns to steam, it disperses but falls back to water and original mass. Nothing is lost, just changed.

It's in the centre of Earth. Where is that? I don't know where it is by navigation because I don't have the means to go anywhere near it and nor would anyone else. I think it would be akin to walking towards a magnet factory dressed in knights armour. See what I mean?

Parky is having a good go. You aren't. If it were another time in history I'd probably be lynched by people like you who believed the man with the book dressed in a big white smock.

All elements on Earth change form. Nothing is really lost in terms of the materials of matter. The only thing that is lost if a change in vibration and frequencies, which can reduce energy output and at times regain it. Nothing is destroyed, just altered in state, until recycled.

I wasn't sure if Rafa was overly keen on him at first, but lately he's been given a run out and did very well. Maybe Rafa and him have had words and we will see the best of him against much better players. The positive side is the fact that he wants to sign for us permanently, from a club like Chelsea. We definitely need plenty of pace and for the price, it's no real gamble, because we can get that back at the very worst. The other plus is, if Rafa trusts him, then I'm happy enough with that.

Such as?

Let's not use something that just goes way beyond reasoning. None of us know what an atom really is, we are just told about atoms. Let's just put it in a basic simple understandable way. Can you make something that resembles diamond out of charcoal? If so then tell me how this could be done.

What resources are we running out of?

How about accepting that we will never agree on anything and leave it at that.

Then please stand up. Please stand up.

I have my very own theories, seriously. I'm not reliant on other theories. I don't follow other theories, but I respect them. I go with these thoughts because I seriously believe we've been sold a load of nonsense throughout life. I'm merely putting my thoughts into forums for people to discuss. Nobody has to take part in this discussion. They can take part in the various other discussions on this forum or any other and bypass what I'm saying. If nobody decides to join in, I'll soon leave this topic and just tick along on something else. The truth is I had a look into this forum, as I do with many forums to do with Newcastle and came across this topic and saw my name mentioned in a nice manner, as usual. lol. I decided to log in and post.

There's more than just trees that keeps this Earth ticking over. Like I said you you earlier. It's a cycle.

It does but you've just taken away the water which will then be filled with atmosphere which is now not pushing against the water, so it becomes much less dense.

Oh well, you tried. Cheers for coming into it and explaining nothing.