mrkikiet

2 weeks ago i would have said avoid seville at all costs but they are beginning to look a little bit vulnerable away from home.

away at deportivo. they've won more points away from home than at home. thursday might be more difficult than expected. according to their manager it's going to be a difficult game on thursday becasue newcastle 'es un gran equipo'

probably going to need a month or two off to recover from a full 90 minutes though.

what did he do?

but acccording to the chronicle he's been given plenty of chances to play. while do they wheel the players out to give these interviews, make them look like clowns and then not even put them on the bench for that match?

didn't roeder say something about not playing half fit players befroe the season started?

get in. totally unexpected.

just in case you missed it the first time around: I don't think we can achieve anything as long as Shola's an important part of the team, I can't say that about many other players. i did miss it the first time round. fair enough.

So we can't have a go at a player having an effect on the result by not playing well? Grand, glad we cleared that up. Just so we're clear, I do think looking at what players are not good enough is beneficial to a conversation about what's wrong with the club, I'm a radical new thinker that way. yes. but by that margin a fair number of the players today deserve criticism, NOT JUST ameobi. a game does change and there is no guarantee that sibierski would have been so influential in the second half.

I believe if Sibierski had stayed on the pitch we'd have won the match. That's pretty significant to the result, don't you think? yes, and? lol, win? yeah? winning? think the point was pretty clear. it's like saying i think if milner had scored we'd have won, that's pretty significant to the result, don't you think? you can't really disagree with it but it doesn't add anything, because they didn't and we lost.

I believe if Sibierski had stayed on the pitch we'd have won the match. That's pretty significant to the result, don't you think? yes, and?

we ended that season playing relatively bad football and it was looking bad. hindsight is wonderful but it was time for Robson to go. He should have gone before he actually did. The fact that since robson we've had a load of muppets has not helped. yeah lets blame a half-fit striker for martins etc going missing. good one. Martins was one of the brightest players on the pitch today for us. He wasnt great, but that tells you how pathetic the others were. And you speak as if Ameobi would have set the world on fire if he was fit, sorry but he just isnt a good player. In fact, he's rubbish. so rubbish he's scored 5 in a team that is doing NOTHING. but there is very little point in re-hashing the whole ameobi shit or not argument.

we ended that season playing relatively bad football and it was looking bad. hindsight is wonderful but it was time for Robson to go. He should have gone before he actually did. The fact that since robson we've had a load of muppets has not helped. yeah lets blame a half-fit striker for martins etc going missing. good one.

Have we employed him then? I knew there was talk of it. on the bench today apparently, according to radio newcastle, fitted in well with his grey suit...

has martins been on the pitch in the second half? not looking to clever now. half-fit players etc...

it's ok though. espanyol have managed to equalise a the end of the first half.

loads of yakubu planting. bastard. sounds like the defending was top drawer.

twat.

didn't work for me earlier.

but unlike souness roeder doesn't do that. 'it's bout not losing it' how depressing

totally disappeared in that second half. chelsea should have scored more. the milan shevhenko would certainly have scored this evening.

spanish commentators are bricking it for celta vigo

and fenerbahce. brilliant

if it's any consolation celta vigo are playing tonk this season. means no trip to barcelona though. (you can't have teams from the same country in the same group can you?)

with the match sequence does A v D mean the same as Pot 1 team against Pot 4 team?