Ken
-
Posts
2213 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by Ken
-
Could only happen from the inside. Oligarchs universally turn on him and it filters down from there
-
The vast majority of that 40 mile convoy are supposedly re-supply vehicles.
-
Not many. Not that I believe what Wikipedia says but 14 and 10 are prototypes. Who knows...
-
I agree and made that point.
-
The Russians haven't brought in their fifth generation fighters into play yet. The same with their standing army they have largely been conscripts and from the East. They have held back their strongest assets and I don't know why.
-
Sorry I don't have a subscription. Yeah old tech but at least it is something that can be considered air support if only for 1 mission only
-
From Poland, Bulgaria and 2 other countries.
-
I agree that by Poland getting involved directly like this has repercussions for that country. It allows Russia an excuse to go after Poland and the conflict inflames even more and may force NATO's hand. Very dangerous.
-
Putin doesn't care for minimising damage and destruction. The first days of this campaign has embarrassed him. He clearly sees red now and will impose his will whatever the cost.
-
Not sure if this is accurate but I have read that Poland are going to allow Ukraine to use their airfields with the planes they are acquiring. The stakes are going up.
-
Its more than concerning. They are heading to Kiev for one reason only, and that's to take the city. A lot of destruction ahead and I fear the city will be razed to the ground.
-
The only thing you would need to worry about is rise in costs for petrol and energy bills.
-
Ukrainians are showing themselves to be strong. Putin would've thought this was going to be quick campaign. Putin is a madman but using nuclear weapons would ensure his country would be obliterated, so I think you are fine. We will agree to disagree on China. They are a menace and a threat to world order and rule of law. They are challenging it. While nations are imposing sanctions on Russia, China are lifting theirs and importing wheat. They are in each other's pockets wanting to change the status quo.
-
Err no. You have mentioned previously that sometimes you cannot control your bowels due to an ailment hence the term shit farter. Of course I agree Europe is an important issue and the reason for NATO's formation was largely because of the threat of Russia. I am not oblivious to this. NATO are superior by way of technological warfare be it precision bombs, and missiles guided in via GPS . Russia has troops and tanks though. That's my concern here. You are completely ignorant on the China threat. You have no idea about that all. My concern with NATO is troops on the ground. Yes they have superiority with weapons systems but battalion to battalion engagement - can NATO deal with that scenario
-
Other Games 21/22: Talk about Actual Football
Ken replied to Ayatollah Hermione's topic in Newcastle Forum
Dont know what this means aside from stepping aside from day to day operations. He may be looking to sell? -
Other Games 21/22: Talk about Actual Football
Ken replied to Ayatollah Hermione's topic in Newcastle Forum
-
It is a question that is yet to be determined you shit farter. The alliance is reliant on America. America will not go all in in Europe. China is the adversary that they view as a threat to their own dominance. Not Russia. In the advent of war within NATO territory I am still yet to be convinced who will supply troops that can defend and repel 150,000 enemy.
-
GOAL!
-
GOAL!
-
He's off!
-
Where did I state that? I am questioning NATO'S ability to put troops on the ground in the event of an invasion on a member state. Who provides the troops?
-
So let's go further. If Russia choose to invade a NATO country, who provides the troops to defend and repel this?
-
Is NATO effective? Who supplies the troops on ground? Genuine question.
-
Yep. NATO is fundamentally useless.
-
Vegan is a big thing
