Jump to content

Bazooka_From_Viduka

Members
  • Content Count

    142
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Bazooka_From_Viduka

  • Rank
    YTS Contract
  1. and Fop, to break you out of your paradox, since you claim passive smoking is harmless, please explain this report: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups.../dh_4101475.pdf I suspect you will dismiss it, but this is the evidence that MP's took a free vote on, so these are the facts you need to refute if you want to retain even the slightest piece of dignity in this thread
  2. In the first few pages. Just £2.50 a day for senility drugs you know, help with memory and everything. I don't see it Ah that'd be the £10,000-£20,000 for blindness then (and pray for the masturbation ban ASAP). fine, I don't really care. you've proven time and again incapable of holding a logical argument or even answering basic points, seemingly intent rather to act like a complete tosser Every time I do you just ignore it and try a different tangent, so if that is your "proof" then , and everyone has to make the most of it before the ban. you havent
  3. the problem is, you think you're making a point by being sarcastic and convoluted, when you actually forget to include any facts or examples to back yourself up
  4. In the first few pages. Just £2.50 a day for senility drugs you know, help with memory and everything. I don't see it Ah that'd be the £10,000-£20,000 for blindness then (and pray for the masturbation ban ASAP). fine, I don't really care. you've proven time and again incapable of holding a logical argument or even answering basic points, seemingly intent rather to act like a complete tosser Every time I do you just ignore it and try a different tangent, so if that is your "proof" then , and everyone has to make the most of it before the ban. you havent
  5. In the first few pages. Just £2.50 a day for senility drugs you know, help with memory and everything. I don't see it Ah that'd be the £10,000-£20,000 for blindness then (and pray for the masturbation ban ASAP). fine, I don't really care. you've proven time and again incapable of holding a logical argument or even answering basic points, seemingly intent rather to act like a complete tosser
  6. In the first few pages. Just £2.50 a day for senility drugs you know, help with memory and everything. I don't see it
  7. Again I do, you just don't seem to know what I am talking about (no great surprise though perhaps). find me the relevant passage that bans private smoking clubs then Find me the relevant passage that exempts them first and I will.... oh wait. no exemption required it's the whole point of the bill No exemption exists, although it would have done under the original proposed ban. Out of interest why was it only food serving pubs then in the first place? (before the scare and lies got into it) and not non-food pubs and private members club? Or do they ju
  8. Again I do, you just don't seem to know what I am talking about (no great surprise though perhaps). find me the relevant passage that bans private smoking clubs then Find me the relevant passage that exempts them first and I will.... oh wait. no exemption required it's the whole point of the bill No exemption exists, although it would have done under the original proposed ban. Out of interest why was it only food serving pubs then in the first place? (before the scare and lies got into it) and not non-food pubs and private members club? Or do they ju
  9. channel 4 now, all about the history of smoking and the media hilarious some of the absolute crap peddled about smoking by the tobacco companies, and the government is being accused of being sneaky?
  10. Again I do, you just don't seem to know what I am talking about (no great surprise though perhaps). find me the relevant passage that bans private smoking clubs then Find me the relevant passage that exempts them first and I will.... oh wait. no exemption required it's the whole point of the bill but that would make it a bill protecting workers and not an anti smoking human rights issue wouldn't it, so that can't be right surely.....
  11. Again I do, you just don't seem to know what I am talking about (no great surprise though perhaps). find me the relevant passage that bans private smoking clubs then
  12. Aye it's fine if you go blind or go senile if it costs "too much" money. Just so long as it doesn't cost too much treating smokers, eh? I thought we made more money out of smokers than we spent? do you have a clue what the costs of all these applications are or was this a daft off topic post for the hell of it?
  13. Funny smells, I think. discrimination in the workplace actually Hehe yes, now that every other "argument" has been shot down in flames you seem to have settled on that (except for miners for which "discrimination" is clearly fine you believe ). Via the revolution, the workers should not be stinky!!! Again, nope. Not unless it's simply a group of people in someones house, there could have been an exemption but they rejected it IIRC. what other definition have you got for a smokers club then? You must have lead a sheltered life if you don't know what I'm t
  14. I still want to know what this 3 weeks has to do with it
  15. considering a nearby sewage plant flooded, I would think there is a high likelihood that lake contains a few turds
×
×
  • Create New...