wolfy

The operative word with this game is exactly that. Toys.

There are no facts other than the one's that we know. A below the belt strike that I didn't expect from a forum owner/part owner who I would have expected to be neutral.

No, but I do remember when you changed my password. I'm sure you recall that. It's pretty hard to have a fair crack of the whip when you have people holding all the cards in a stacked hand, right? You're admin and you can basically play forum god as and when you choose. It's a win win for people like yourself and there's nothing I can do about it. Flouncing?....It depends how each person views it. I view it as abuse of power.

It'll play out just like the so called cold war played out. Just another one played on the public to keep everyone scared for nothing.

The way the market is and the way that some clubs are trying to punch well above their weight, transfer wise, I think will create a less than focused squad/team ethic. The key is getting a - in it together mindset - along with the physical and technical coaching. I believe Rafa can do much better than most in this situation regardless of our players apparently looking inferior to many other teams players, in certain fans eyes. I think we've bought well considering the money spent. We might not rip up the prem but I believe we are good enough to make an equal, if not better fist of it than most clubs, barring the obvious big spending top 7 or 8 usual suspects. I'd say we could do with a top all round striker added into the mix before the window closes, but hopefully we can manage until then in using what we have at our disposal, in Mitro and Gayle with a generous contribution from the attack minded crew.

It doesn't look too promising with this kid on paper but a change of quality of man management and coaching can pay dividends, potentially. The situation is a no lose for us because it would be a loan, assuming we do bring him in. I just have a feeling that he'll be assassinated.

The player that created the most excitement in coming to Newcastle and also creating the most hope for winning silverware when he played for us, was, for me, Alan Shearer.

It makes me laugh when you see Kim sitting there holding binoculars, supposedly looking out at his so called ICBM's lifting off in the distance, whilst he's sat near a bunch of commodore 64 like computers. We are and have been played like a pack of mugs for long enough with these jokers. The laughable part... or scary part, depending on how people take all of this nonsense, is, they will crank this right up and have even bigger laughs at our expense. The people I feel really sorry for are the genuine folk who buy into all of this and are fearing a nuclear war, for no other reason than trusting the media sources that aid in pushing agendas. All it takes if for people to use their own available time and mind and they will see what a farce it all is. Those who are happy to accept the nuke nonsense and the fictional arguments between superpowers against rogue nations, all I can say is, try not to worry too much about the games they play, because as nutty as these people appear to be to you in terms of you thinking they will press a nuke button, just remember one simple thing: Life is too short to hang onto constant worrying shenanigans played out for you by the scripted media. You were born with a logical brain and lots of potential to use it. The problem is our logic is being battered into submission in favour of literally scripted bollocks.

I think we're treated to a hell of a lot of green screen and a lot of rent a crowd participation, not to mention the silly looking missile props.

No further correspondence necessary with you.

The silly part in all of this is the mere fact that you are implying that I've mentioned what you claim I have. You need to calm down and stop getting yourself into a frenzy and trying to use emotion to gain some kind of foothold. Here's something for you to stay on topic. Is it possible that nukes are fake and is it possible that NK is just being used as a duping tool for the ever gullible masses to be scared into believing they have the capabilities to send nukes to targets thousands of miles away? Is it possible? I'll put that question to anyone else. My view is, it's not only a continuing massive dupe on the public but the entire news network that promote this stuff are going one step further in attempting to blatantly take the piss out of the entire public.

Lucas it this way. If we get him then it'll be a fairly decent perezent.

You are a weakling. I don't seem so boring now, right? You feel it's your time for emotion and to show the good people what a bad bastard I am by putting words into mouths...or type. Weak as piss.

I've never used sheeple. Atoms only supposedly appeared to view not too many years ago and yet they invented an atom bomb by splitting something they couldn't detect as being anything. Have a serious think about the propaganda of it all. I'm sure you'll give it 1 second of thought.

Read up and you might grasp what I say. If not, no worries.

You can bang on as much as you want but don't expect me to play your emotion game.

We are all hypocrites in life but like I said about questioning this stuff. I am not putting my thoughts out as anything of a whole truth. I have musings as to what stuff can be other than what we are told. The issue is about what we are told to accept, not about what I believe the alternative is.

When did I claim this?

I've never used the word, sheeple. I've called us all Sheep because we are, including myself. As far as lifetime working is concerned, what are you talking about?

To argue against something you have to go by what is given out. Van Allen radiation belts are apparently 1000 to 25,000 miles into space we are told and yet some so called satellites are placed 23,000 miles out, we are told and yet they work perfectly fine and yet the so called space experts appeared to worry about so called moon craft and rockets venturing into the belts because their communications and components would be rendered iffy to useless, as they told us the stories. Consistency is the key that seems to bypass the so called space experts as time goes on, it seems. Any any person in this day and age that believes they landed on the moon with that piece of shit contraption would be wise to spend some time going over it all, unless none of it provokes any interest, in which case, fair do's.

I repeat anything that is not grasped by people like you. And you do seem to believe anything officially told to you.

It can't be explained because reality and logic makes it impossible to work. Only people put on pedestals to argue the case for it seem to pacify the masses, simply because most people do not understand what a near vacuum is and why it kills off all this so called scientific space garbage. Same as ICBM's with so called nuclear tips. Fly to the edge of so called space and arc towards their target thousands of miles away. It basic nonsense but makes for good sci-fi and excellent for scaring the crap our of populations. You don't even know why it all works. You accept it does because you are told, regardless of what you think I say. ICBM's simply do not work and are certainly not tipped with any city destroying warheads. Real missiles launch and arc almost immediately towards their target a few miles away...maybe 20/3040 or so miles away, unless they're fitted with wings, which means they basically cease to be ballistic. Yep, it goes a long way into seeing some of this bullshit. You don't know my views. You use emotion as an argument against me just like Renton. Poor form.

Take a long hard look at yourself before you pass comment.

My views are merely questions against what we are basically indoctrinated into, so, if the majority questioned the indoctrination we've all been subject to, then we would have a better chance at getting the truth. Until that happens I'll always be in the extreme minority.

My so called shit patter is only shit to those who genuinely think it is shit. Personally the replies tell me otherwise...including yours. The issue isn't about my so called shit patter. the issue is your own ego is writing cheques your body can't cash. Sorry about that, I just had to take that bit from TOP GUN. Just because you appear to accept everything it doesn't mean that all people are happy to do so. Anti vaxxers have a choice but it's a massive lottery they take. No matter what you argue in favour of it, it doesn't mean that a game of eeny meenie miney moe isn't being played among populations. A sort of guinea-pig play. Maybe most vaccinations are exactly what they are. I believe many are just that and accept them. I also believe there's others that are less than full on effective, but that's another story. You just appear to want to persecute any person that goes against anything mainstream official lines has to put out.