wolfy

Why should I do it when fisty is messing with it. It's his picture. I'll just copy it.

It's getting there but not quite. I'll let you know when it's just right.

Explain what gravity is in laymans terms. I don't want to know what it does. I just want to know what it is as a force.

Can you explain what gravity is?

Just keep it to I'm sceptimatic and I'll put it straight on.

I go with what I go with. I've explained what gravity really is, so how about you explain what they tell you gravity is as a force.

Nobody has to accept anything I say. I'm just putting my thoughts out. I'm a loony in the worlds eyes, so not many will bother to look into what I'm saying. Just take it for what you think it is. I'm serious about it but that's just me.

Hahahahahahaha. Nice one. I think I'll use this as my avatar on the flat Earth forum if you take the top swearing part out.

I am sceptimatic.

Well done. That's my theory. That's me on that forum.

Same thing. The aluminium ball is still porous and absorbs atmospheric pressure. Just because you can't see it with your own eyes does not make it a full on solid. The likes of gold are closer to real full on solids after melting, which don't absorb hardly any pressure, so it displaces it more, which is why it's so heavy and dense.

Denpressure and the ice dome are my theories. I haven't seen anyone with the same exact theories. Like I said, I saw someone mention a glass dome, nobody that I know apart from me uses denpressure as gravity.

We're all under pressure mate. We can't escape that.

How am I being obtuse?

Of course it wouldn't. A polystrene ball is full of air. It's virtually equalised with the atmospheric pressure it's in. A titanium solid ball is exerting just about all of it's mass and density against the atmospheric pressure.

I'm asking you what similar things.

what similar things?

A lot of science is theory passed off as fact. It's a clever ruse because it gives scientists scope to alter findings as flaws appear, where they can say, " well, it was only a theory." Yes, we get told it's peer reviewed and all the rest of it..but the same thing applies to the peers who review. They are merely going on the supposed best hypothesis in many cases, especially where so called space is concerned. Of course, you could argue with me by telling me that they do know because they sent up space ships and such like. You know my thoughts on that stuff and also you cannot directly prove any of that yourself, although you can state it as fact because you can use all kinds of reasons as in, "why would they lie" or "hundreds upon hundreds of years have proved it where it's been fine tuned." You only know what they tell you where this stuff is concerned. All I'm saying is, I question it. It's up to others whether they do or not. That's not my call and nor can I offer any full on undeniable physical proof of what I'm saying, yet no more than anyone can do for me. I can be told to go and visit NASA or many other variations of supposed provable scientific institutes. It means nothing because no rodinary person is going anywhere near this stuff to directly prove anything, so it's a simple case of accept it. I don't accept it because it's not convincing.

Denpressure is any dense element against atmospheric pressure, basically. That's your gravity. Anything that goes into the atmosphere is pushing up against that atmosphere if it's more dense. The atmosphere is simply stacked molecules in various states depending on where they are in the atmosphere, ranging from dense matter at sea level to more expanded matter the higher up it is. Everything starts with a push up. For instance, you grow up into that pressure. You're continually pushing into the atmosphere until you stop growing, then you simply live under that pressure that is trying to bury you back into the Earth which it eventually will do over time as your body weakens against it, as it pushes down on your head. then shoulders whilst friction gripping you at your sides all the way to the solid floor. Your feet ensure you don't get pushed into the solid floor. You weigh nothing. Your dense body has no weight. Weight is a human measurement of dense objects under pressure. Your weight is dependent on the atmospheric pressure upon your body in a push on push fight that can be phsically seen on a scale, because your body is being pushed onto that scale by the 15psi your are in as your body pushes against that. Think of it like samson trying to push one pillar away by using the other as leverage. I don't expect you to get what I'm saying and you can keep gravity in mind f you want. The thing is. I can explain what so called gravity really is and yet the science world can't. except that it's an unknown force, yet it's believed.

Physical evidence would provide me with the truth. How can I get physical evidence of what I'm questioning? Merely saying that Rikko knows a sub is really nuclear is not evidence. You knowing how a radio works is not evidence of what Earth is. Fist saying he sees curvature from a tall building is not evidence. I've viewed the horizon at sea and it's flat and level. That does not prove a flat Earth no more than someone saying they see a curve proves a rotating globe. The truth of the matter is that we have simply been taught to accept what's told. Obviously is mass indoctrination, so follow the leader and do not question what is officially told and be ridiculed if you do by people who are told that anyone who goes against the grain are conspiracy nut jobs or lunatics, etc. I'm a lunatic for simply questioning things that do not add up. That's fine, it means nothing to me, as it doesn't change what I think. You tell me what proof you have of the Earth being a rotating globe?

I am allowed to refute it if I feel it's wrong or suspect it's made up nonsense. That's my prerogative. Whether you think that's arrogance or not is beside the point. It's arrogant of you to tell me that I'm not allowed to refute official lines. This is the reason why people never question it, because it's scorned upon by the people who simply accept it all for truth without physically knowing if it really is the whole truth.

You can believe what you want just as I can.

Yeah of course. Obviously players will negotiate bigger pay days, or their agents, anyway. What I mean is, I'm glad we don't go and spend ridiculous amounts of big name players on mammoth wages who's goal is to use us as just that, like we've seen in the past. I know people think we are going backwards with the way Ashley conducts business and he could have done a lot of things much better as we all know. The thing is, if we went gung-ho on buying top players on top wages, we would set (once again) a precedent by becoming an attractive club to the mercenary players who couldn't give a shit where we finished in the league. Basically all the top clubs in the so called bigger and better cities get the cream of the crop and we, plus other clubs are left to pick the bones of the best of the rest, all ay inflated prices. The good thing about us is, we don't just steam in to buy a player by getting involved in auctions where the prices start to get silly. Ok it sometimes makes us look like a skin flint outfit at times, yet we still manage to get top quality players in most times for sensible fees. I feel that there are better times ahead for us. I know many won't agree. It's just my positive thoughts on how I see the club slowly inching itself back up. I can see us having a much better season this season after the turmoil we've had to endure.

We already have 3 new signings through the door and to be fair they are decent signings too. I reckon we will have at least another 3 in before the real pre-season kicks in. It's a shame Debuchy will be gone but we will sort that area out, plus add a decent striker to the ranks, with also a resurgence of form from Cisse to come, hopefully. It's been slow and irritating but I'm glad we don't pay stupid money out for players like Shaw who's only 18 and went for 30 million and Lallana for 25 million. It looks like we are unambitious but I'd prefer to see players who want to play for the club not players who just see pound signs and sign for that reason. We all want to see success but we will never see it by offering stupid wages and transfer fees to the best players, because the bright lights of London and the favourable top clubs are mostly the aim of those type of players. So on that note, it's best that we nibble away and keep building up on players that are desperate to play for the club. That's my take as I'm always of a positive mind where Newcastle is concerned.

That's fair enough, you're entitled to think that. I would have probably called someone the same thing a good while back so I can hardly blame anyone for thinking I am.