bez

I answered that . The quality issue is a problem. I appreciate your persistance in chatting me up but I'm married and heterosexual. Sorry. 49499[/snapback] ahahahahahaaa What kind of answer is that? 49505[/snapback] A stereotypically prejudiced homophobic one, to be honest. I think I'll kick up a stink with the admins. 49517[/snapback] You didnt see the PM he sent. 49521[/snapback] I'm sure Dotbum's solicitor will be glad to see that 49526[/snapback] Libel and unrequited love are different. Don't get bitter just cos I binned you Sima.

I answered that . The quality issue is a problem. I appreciate your persistance in chatting me up but I'm married and heterosexual. Sorry. 49499[/snapback] ahahahahahaaa What kind of answer is that? 49505[/snapback] A stereotypically prejudiced homophobic one, to be honest. I think I'll kick up a stink with the admins. 49517[/snapback] You didnt see the PM he sent.

Cheers. Coming from you, its a compliment. See thats the difference with intelligence. You 'believe' I havent got a clue. I know you haven't. Have a lovely evening.

That you don't like the answer doesn't mean it hasn't been answered. Good luck with the next boy. Sorry if I hurt your feelings.

I answered that . The quality issue is a problem. I appreciate your persistance in chatting me up but I'm married and heterosexual. Sorry. 49499[/snapback] Touche professor, by the way, anyone who actually knew what I was talking about would have twigged why I said it and what it was in relation to straight away. You haven't answered my question, you gave me a rather paltry book synopsis. Why are you so reticent to admit you weren't familiar with what I was saying, I freely admitted I hadn't heard of your Jerome Bruner(?), but then that would be because I'm an idiot wouldn't it? 49503[/snapback] Really? I had to (it wasnt interesting) look at persig years ago. Bruner was a suggestion when I thought you had some credibility. Now? I doubt you have the faculty for his work. Shame, some of what you say is decent. Other stuff is childish and dim. You are brighter than the other one mind.

I answered that . The quality issue is a problem. I appreciate your persistance in chatting me up but I'm married and heterosexual. Sorry.

Liar? You show half a post then concoct some daft story? Youre an idiot son. As it says in the last post. If you want to argue, take it to PM. Go on then sonny. what questions this time. I am trying to buy an amplifier so be quick.

That's it in full, don't know how I managed that, although why you would think I did it on purpose, how do you come off any better off with the rest added? EDIT: That's why, when you first get a PM you get the first line on a pink background at the top, I thought that was the whole message, no intention to mislead anyone there. 49489[/snapback] Bless.

Post them on here tbh. 49484[/snapback] Not a cry for support btw, a genuine concern that I might actually come across like him. The bloke who hasn't realised that if he were an esteemed professor his behavior would be made worse, not better. And why did he start to get abusive with me? Because he knew I'd caught him in a lie. This bloke's got to be AF, there can't be 2 like him, can there? Even down to the multiple accounts and attention seeking on the pretext of genuinely caring about racism. I thought AF had moved on, though. Seems to be grand now. 49486[/snapback] You cropped it. didnt that show you in such a mature light? I said. If you want to pick an argument then be man enough to see it through on your own without crying for help. Youre funny. More of a prick than obnoxious. One to feel sad for. Does your lack of academic achievement make you feel weak? Is that why fell you need help? If you wish to argue your case on your own then feel free to reply to the PM. Cheers.

Incorrect about Birmingham Peaspud. Are you suggesting that Asians and Blacks aren't races? thus it's not racism? Is racism something that has a fixed term? KROF and the law states otherwise. One chance then gone. Record is there forever. the one youre talking about is 'slapped wrist' 'bad lad' come back That very example shows it is condoned. Incidentally, there are other issues relating to N-O that i have left with a couple of lads here. Try and say something racist at SJP then try and get back in. Or go to Anfield and try. Its gone. NOT condoned. the bling comments, which several have stated are very dodgy, hardly help you.

Fair enough. If that is what you feel, then that is progress on this board.

I totally disagree with your book synopsis there, not the question I asked though. I have no letters after my name, and doubt I ever will. 49458[/snapback] I doubt it too. We agree. 49460[/snapback] So the only thing you objectioning to is a throwaway comment about JJ "bling bastard I hope you die". This comment has been condoned across the board yet you still chunter on. 49471[/snapback] Condone means they think it is OK. Is that what you meant to say?

why? you not going to accept my arguments if I dont have any? 49454[/snapback] Not you Peasepud. The idiot who finds trivialising things he doesnt understand the easist way to 'look' intelligent. He hasnt answered yet whilst attempting ot look 'educated' Yesterday, as I acknowledged, we (you + several others) had a decent debate. You clearly have intelligence. However, youre mistaken on so many levels. I won't list the issues you personally fail to see regarding racism (and your responsibilties) but feel free to PM if you want to know. 49457[/snapback] Racism is a terrible thing which needs to be stamped out however my argument against yours isnt about that its your view of what constitutes racism and the fact that because you didnt see black fans on Sunday then the club is racist. We also disagree on what should be done to rectify things and on how bad the problem actually is. I dont agree that a few stats showing higher percentages of black youths in prison or that there are no black judges or few black football mangers means this country is racist. There are other socio-economic factors to take into account as well as the fact that like it or not, a number of black youths lean toward the whole gun/ drug culture therefore they will inevitably end up in prison or dead. I also strongly dislike the argument you are making that because you can quote someone on this board saying "Jenas is a bling bastard" then this or other boards are racist. The fact nobody has said the same sentence against Bellamy doesnt make the original occurence of it racist. No matter how many times you repeat it, the word bling is not a racist slur, its a form of the word flash as in "hes a flash bastard". I keep bringing up the fact you have three accounts for the simple reason that you made out you only registered here at the weekend, by doing that you made me wary of your motives. I do believe that as an established member of this board you would have gained more respect originally if you'd posted as yourself. 49467[/snapback] I do think the board has some racist issues. It certainly has racist members. Both boards do. They know it. That is condoning racism I am afraid. KROF. The analogy applies. Kicked out of one ground for racism = kicked out of all - forever. Incidentally, I have sent a PM to a couple of people regarding my own behaviour in the past. There is little doubt at all in my mind (and taking your blinkers off I suspect your change of tone yesterday means you can see it too) that people use the bling word as a substitute for black. As youre so suspicious you should see that. Perhaps your role here makes you precious. 3 accounts? 1st : No idea at all what my log in was - it has been an awful long time since I used that login. I assume you can see that on your statistics. 2nd KROF day. People need reminding. Job done 3rd Job done. Dont need the previous moniker. Motives? KROF Nb: As you feel society has no real race problem perhaps you can pop down to Birmingham tonight.

I totally disagree with your book synopsis there, not the question I asked though. I have no letters after my name, and doubt I ever will. 49458[/snapback] I doubt it too. We agree.

why? you not going to accept my arguments if I dont have any? 49454[/snapback] Not you Peasepud. The idiot who finds trivialising things he doesnt understand the easist way to 'look' intelligent. He hasnt answered yet whilst attempting ot look 'educated' Yesterday, as I acknowledged, we (you + several others) had a decent debate. You clearly have intelligence. However, youre mistaken on so many levels. I won't list the issues you personally fail to see regarding racism (and your responsibilties) but feel free to PM if you want to know.

IP check throw up anything of interest? Some sort of name and shame section whould be nice. 49450[/snapback] Heavens. Am I of that much interest to you? Lordy. You know how to have a good time don't you. So, letters AFTER name?

Very quickly, If you look at the construction of his own reality then consider the issues relating to quality within that reality then I think his error in assuming we don't have that quality withing our own reality. Too much empirical evidence is used. Its a theory. Flawed though.

Ahh apologies I just assumed that someone of a more advanced aged and intellect wouldnt lie about their age on their main logon account. 49445[/snapback] My apologies for hitting random numbers when making accounts. anything else? Do you always fill in junk accurately?

Yes it is, I'm interested in why it took you so long to say that. Google is our friend, hey, AF? 49440[/snapback] I didnt see it? You commented on it. I replied. Everyone can mis-spell so I won't go down your purile route. Pirsig's work is flawed but interesting in the manner its constructed. Do you want me to explain it to you? With your razor sharp mind and wit you will go far. So how many words AFTER your name?

The mind boggles. 49409[/snapback] Assuming the people here had one. Apologies for grammar and typing. Wasnt aware it was it a test. As for 1sr year sociology? Nope 16 letters after name so far. More to come in December. Yourself? 49412[/snapback] I've got 11 letters in my name, first time I've ever checked that, had to use my fingers and all! How do you feel about Pirzig's arguments on the Church of Reason? 49417[/snapback] It's Pirsig. Not Pirzig I said after name . Not in it.

That could, of course, be one and the same problem. Incorrect though. Academia isn't any better than anywhere else with regard to racism. It does note the problems though and takes an interest in what is happening at present. It is aware of what is right and what is wrong. What can lead to where. What is derived from what and why. That allows progress. Funnily enough the same sort of thing happened in the last 50 years and we have progressed as a result. Now isnt the time to stop. For your information. 'Bling' is NOT racist on its own. However, the choice of terminology and context combined do lead to problems. Hence the comments regarding David 'bling' Beckham being very different to Jermaine 'bling bastard i hope you die' Jenas. It's use becomes slightly worse when we note that similar terms are used for NUFC's black players but the white ones avoid it. We havent had Craig 'bling (in its OED sense) bastard' Bellamy for instance. That it is condoned on both forums tells you all you need to know about the age of those running them. Enjoy your evening.

This isnt a game to win. Stop acting like a child. You have trivialised enough. That is the issue. The cropping of your post does indeed make you look less of a tit but if that makes you happy then fair enough. i am flattered by your assumption of my age peasepud. Incorrect but that seems to be par for the course.

The mind boggles. 49409[/snapback] So basically, given you've referred to people as 'side lights' bez, you're trivialsing the issue and, hence, propogating the problem? 49411[/snapback] Well done Alex. Your ignorance has trivialised a decent debate. I worry for people like you. I worry that you have so little to say of relevance. Enjoy half-term. 49413[/snapback] I may be wrong but I believe you started the name calling. What is writing off the views of people who don't agree with you as school kids if it isn't trivialising the debate? You may well be an academic and you come across as a clever person but that doesn't necessarily make you right. The funny thing is, nobody defended the comments about Jenas, just some people didn't think they were necessarily racist. You disagreed, which is fine. 49419[/snapback] You have lost track. In fact I responded to your trivilisation alex. The name calling? Look back and see where it starts. You will be surprised. Nb: If this opens anyones eyes to the issue rather than descending into childish behaviour then its worth it. There are more racist issues here (supporting NUFC) than people are aware of. In a few years time some of what is written will look deplorable. That it isnt evident to some now doesnt mean it doesnt exist. That is the point and I will argue that for now and remind you of it sometime.

I feel privileged, honestly. The irony of you callling others bairns on this issue! If Bruner is a one strike and out kind of guy I doubt I'd have much time for him, I'm not really down with the totalitarian posse, ooh, racist, shame. The idea that I trivialise racism? Another pathetic misconception by yourself. 49414[/snapback] Bruner isn't. The irony is that you assume he is. Read up on it. You might learn something. He talks of culture and it's place and importance in modern society. Sadly, there are examples of you trivialising this issue. You commented on one yourself. As for misconception? Well, tell me how well qualified you are to tell me I'm a 1st year sociology student. Plenty of irony from you Dotbum.

The mind boggles. 49409[/snapback] So basically, given you've referred to people as 'side lights' bez, you're trivialsing the issue and, hence, propogating the problem? 49411[/snapback] Well done Alex. Your ignorance has trivialised a decent debate. I worry for people like you. I worry that you have so little to say of relevance. Enjoy half-term.