Park Life

But the island wasn't purgatory. What was the island then? The island was real, it existed in the real world. It was only the alternative timeline that was purgatory. So they all died when the bomb went off (when Juliette died on the Island) ? The bomb sent them back to 2007 because of the reaction with the electromagnetism it exploded on top of. Jack died on the island thanks to his stab wound, Hurley and Ben died at some point in the future while protecting the island while Kate and Sawyer got off, lived lives off the island and then died. The purgatory or what have you, they created existed in a space devoid of time and was merely created by them to reunite when they died to move on, whether into heaven or even nothingness. It was just one place for them to all be together (I.E. give us a happy ending). That just stinks though and makes a mockery of all the indepth character buildup, sub-plots, mysteries and the quasi-godlike powers of the island.

They are Aye the sad tossers banned me for spoilers a day after the last episode aired, how the fuck it works I don't know. No doubt Billtray has shown everyone this on the pet hates thread, and Inochi has already said that he will send me more abusive PM's and they will all call me in a few days when I've been unbanned but I've gone away for a few days to see family and won't have access to the internet. By the way I never called Andy or any of the mods anything, no hard feeling towards them, just still wondering how it is classed as a spoiler. Don't worry yerself that Inochi geezer has made the silly but rather consequential mistake of crossing me.

By the time the fight rolled around, Locke/MiB couldn't become the smoke anyway. Pulling the cork out made him mortal. It's what I said, "turned off the quantum field generator..." .

Don't fight the power.

The finale was poor mainly cause they turned off the quantum field generator before the fight.

Lost was just a mechanism to squeeze as many $$$ as possible from a piss weak concept. You of all people should wake up to this. Yes that as well.

The thing is that Lost was right on the edge of the curve with its mix of mythology and time travel and the redemtive cycle...It's really hard to grind that all down into a cumulative answers structure and deliver what people want. Not what they are even aware they want, but the standardisation of opionions and perceived needs they are informed and coerced into wanting as endgames or closure. You don't really know what you want anyway.

There's a massive brain in that shelf like forehead.

What ans exacgtly do poeple want? I wouldn't have given any.

You've got to love him really.

Photoshopped.

Check the bloke at 2.30

Yeah have you got one with the moon on a stick too? Everything but that... Rapid growth spurt leaves amount of ice at levels seen 29 years ago. Thanks to a rapid rebound in recent months, global sea ice levels now equal those seen 29 years ago, when the year 1979 also drew to a close. Ice levels had been tracking lower throughout much of 2008, but rapidly recovered in the last quarter. In fact, the rate of increase from September onward is the fastest rate of change on record, either upwards or downwards. The data is being reported by the University of Illinois's Arctic Climate Research Center, and is derived from satellite observations of the Northern and Southern hemisphere polar regions. Each year, millions of square kilometers of sea ice melt and refreeze. However, the mean ice anomaly -- defined as the seasonally-adjusted difference between the current value and the average from 1979-2000, varies much more slowly. That anomaly now stands at just under zero, a value identical to one recorded at the end of 1979, the year satellite record-keeping began. Sea ice is floating and, unlike the massive ice sheets anchored to bedrock in Greenland and Antarctica, doesn't affect ocean levels. However, due to its transient nature, sea ice responds much faster to changes in temperature or precipitation and is therefore a useful barometer of changing conditions. Earlier this year, predictions were rife that the North Pole could melt entirely in 2008. Instead, the Arctic ice saw a substantial recovery. Bill Chapman, a researcher with the UIUC's Arctic Center, tells DailyTech this was due in part to colder temperatures in the region. Chapman says wind patterns have also been weaker this year. Strong winds can slow ice formation as well as forcing ice into warmer waters where it will melt. Why were predictions so wrong? Researchers had expected the newer sea ice, which is thinner, to be less resilient and melt easier. Instead, the thinner ice had less snow cover to insulate it from the bitterly cold air, and therefore grew much faster than expected, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center. In May, concerns over disappearing sea ice led the U.S. to officially list the polar bear a threatened species, over objections from experts who claimed the animal's numbers were increasing.

Trying to decided if it's the writers who didn't in the end have the intellectual capacity to deliver something more rewarding or whether they've held back cause the audience are too stooopid.

Well...Dracula is running the club.

Think they're gonna use the earthquakes weapon anyway.

Milner to score in final. Now we've let him go he's going to become one of the best players in the world or summink...Nailed on.

It will be intolerable if Bayern win tonight. Can't stand that bald Dutch cernt either.

Stella is one of those beers that goes straight to me head.

The more you focus on just been a decent side, the more you fall behind.

I dont disagree but I think those days have gone. In all partys it is now the social elite pulling the strings. Always have been.

Yeah nothing. Lovely double bluff by Meef.

you couldn't get more like the last lot than milliband ( d). He was a creator of Blairism and worked for Blair til 2001 before becoming an mp and holding various government posts. Allthough youngish, he is definitely old skool blairite. You could argue the same of Blair as he worked for Kinnock & Smith. Miliband is as revolutionary as Blair was IMO. Balls is straight out the Brown mould and therefore bad news for Labour. Would make a good double act, unite both sides of the party?

Life is short enough why torture yourself? the wife, simple as. if i was a single man, i would smoke no doubt. she adopted a clever approach; if i smoke, sex is off the cards. That's a tricky one. How about smoke days and nookie days? there's still the endless grief to put up with on the smoke days. "you said you'd give up and you never do" "i don't want you to die of lung cancer" "your breath smells disgusting, don't kiss me" etc etc Put a nicotine patch on her as she sleeps.