bobbyshinton 59 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 http://www.rsssf.com/tablese/engalltime.html found the above site interesting, sorry if repost also sorry I do not know how to post link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 That's a quality site for stats like. If you're a dweeb, like me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 20269 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 so we're the 5th best over the past ten years and the 6th best of all time. shame we can't convert this dominance into a few more silver pots like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newcastlebroon 0 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 uefa cup here we come Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Steve_Howey 0 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 who are Glossop North End and Bradford Park Avenue? and Sunderland 9th? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13921 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 10. Chelsea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 10. Chelsea Like they'll be arsed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigsaw's Juggernaut 0 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Its not where you've been, it is where you are now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Its not where you've been, it is where you are now... I want to quote that in every post, for the sake of LM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa Lazaru 0 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 I'm amazed we were 7th for away games, thought we'd be much further down with out away record being poor usually, even when we're going well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13921 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Based on two points per win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 Dropped to 7th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 If you look at all of the teams it's quite clear there's a bigger disparency with us and the mackems in terms of home points gained and away than any other. We're more reliant on home form, don't know if that's because we've had the best support or the distance involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 (edited) If you look at all of the teams it's quite clear there's a bigger disparency with us and the mackems in terms of home points gained and away than any other. We're more reliant on home form, don't know if that's because we've had the best support or the distance involved. Difficult to judge when there's such a variation in the numbers of games played, think it's just short of two thirds on average though, no great variation.... Points taken from home games.... Mackems - 65%. Man City - 65% Newcastle - 64% Villa - 63% Everton 63% Spurs - 62% Liverpool - 61% Chelsea - 61% Arsenal - 60% Man U - 60% Edit: If anything it just looks like the most succesful teams have been less reliant on home form. Edited October 26, 2011 by Happy Face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 If you look at all of the teams it's quite clear there's a bigger disparency with us and the mackems in terms of home points gained and away than any other. We're more reliant on home form, don't know if that's because we've had the best support or the distance involved. Difficult to judge when there's such a variation in the numbers of games played, think it's just short of two thirds on average though, no great variation.... Points taken from home games.... Mackems - 65%. Man City - 65% Newcastle - 64% Villa - 63% Everton 63% Spurs - 62% Liverpool - 61% Chelsea - 61% Arsenal - 60% Man U - 60% When you shag your lass in December do you finish and get your chart out? "Wor lass, my calculations indicate that's the 11th time this year you've cum, while it also indicates you're on 76 for times faked, we need to get this ratio bettered next year." Never known anyone be more of a statto than yee. Soooooo the figures back up my point 5% is a big swing over 100 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 If you look at all of the teams it's quite clear there's a bigger disparency with us and the mackems in terms of home points gained and away than any other. We're more reliant on home form, don't know if that's because we've had the best support or the distance involved. Difficult to judge when there's such a variation in the numbers of games played, think it's just short of two thirds on average though, no great variation.... Points taken from home games.... Mackems - 65%. Man City - 65% Newcastle - 64% Villa - 63% Everton 63% Spurs - 62% Liverpool - 61% Chelsea - 61% Arsenal - 60% Man U - 60% When you shag your lass in December do you finish and get your chart out? "Wor lass, my calculations indicate that's the 11th time this year you've cum, while it also indicates you're on 76 for times faked, we need to get this ratio bettered next year." Never known anyone be more of a statto than yee. Soooooo the figures back up my point 5% is a big swing over 100 years It's a pretty statty thread like tbf I thought Spurs/Man City/Villa had Mug support but Man u were up there with the best. So it doesn't support your argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 If you look at all of the teams it's quite clear there's a bigger disparency with us and the mackems in terms of home points gained and away than any other. We're more reliant on home form, don't know if that's because we've had the best support or the distance involved. Difficult to judge when there's such a variation in the numbers of games played, think it's just short of two thirds on average though, no great variation.... Points taken from home games.... Mackems - 65%. Man City - 65% Newcastle - 64% Villa - 63% Everton 63% Spurs - 62% Liverpool - 61% Chelsea - 61% Arsenal - 60% Man U - 60% When you shag your lass in December do you finish and get your chart out? "Wor lass, my calculations indicate that's the 11th time this year you've cum, while it also indicates you're on 76 for times faked, we need to get this ratio bettered next year." Never known anyone be more of a statto than yee. Soooooo the figures back up my point 5% is a big swing over 100 years It's a pretty statty thread like tbf I thought Spurs/Man City/Villa had Mug support but Man u were up there with the best. So it doesn't support your argument. Yes it does we're basically top of importance of the home crowd for points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 If you look at all of the teams it's quite clear there's a bigger disparency with us and the mackems in terms of home points gained and away than any other. We're more reliant on home form, don't know if that's because we've had the best support or the distance involved. Difficult to judge when there's such a variation in the numbers of games played, think it's just short of two thirds on average though, no great variation.... Points taken from home games.... Mackems - 65%. Man City - 65% Newcastle - 64% Villa - 63% Everton 63% Spurs - 62% Liverpool - 61% Chelsea - 61% Arsenal - 60% Man U - 60% When you shag your lass in December do you finish and get your chart out? "Wor lass, my calculations indicate that's the 11th time this year you've cum, while it also indicates you're on 76 for times faked, we need to get this ratio bettered next year." Never known anyone be more of a statto than yee. Soooooo the figures back up my point 5% is a big swing over 100 years It's a pretty statty thread like tbf I thought Spurs/Man City/Villa had Mug support but Man u were up there with the best. So it doesn't support your argument. Yes it does we're basically top of importance of the home crowd for points. Aye It's the reasons I'm not so sure about, given the spread of geography and quality of home support from the others. Unless Man City fans ARE up there with us and better than Man U. I'd be over the moon with 87 times a year and over 10% orgasm provision by the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 If you look at all of the teams it's quite clear there's a bigger disparency with us and the mackems in terms of home points gained and away than any other. We're more reliant on home form, don't know if that's because we've had the best support or the distance involved. Difficult to judge when there's such a variation in the numbers of games played, think it's just short of two thirds on average though, no great variation.... Points taken from home games.... Mackems - 65%. Man City - 65% Newcastle - 64% Villa - 63% Everton 63% Spurs - 62% Liverpool - 61% Chelsea - 61% Arsenal - 60% Man U - 60% When you shag your lass in December do you finish and get your chart out? "Wor lass, my calculations indicate that's the 11th time this year you've cum, while it also indicates you're on 76 for times faked, we need to get this ratio bettered next year." Never known anyone be more of a statto than yee. Soooooo the figures back up my point 5% is a big swing over 100 years It's a pretty statty thread like tbf I thought Spurs/Man City/Villa had Mug support but Man u were up there with the best. So it doesn't support your argument. Yes it does we're basically top of importance of the home crowd for points. Aye It's the reasons I'm not so sure about, given the spread of geography and quality of home support from the others. Unless Man City fans ARE up there with us and better than Man U. I'd be over the moon with 87 times a year and over 10% orgasm provision by the way. ahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now