Tom_NUFC 0 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 Something, I'd forgotten about, but the Sports bloke on Look North has just said that Newcastle will pay Real Madrid less than £16m, due to the money Real owe NUFC for Woodgate. Makes sense, so I suppose we haven't forked out as much as people think, and with that £8m recouped from Jenas going to Spurs, it's really not that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 36813 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 He's basically free I reckon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chip2388 0 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 Yer read that in the paper as well makes sense i suppose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 He's basically free I reckon. 24754[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 Something, I'd forgotten about, but the Sports bloke on Look North has just said that Newcastle will pay Real Madrid less than £16m, due to the money Real owe NUFC for Woodgate. Makes sense, so I suppose we haven't forked out as much as people think, and with that £8m recouped from Jenas going to Spurs, it's really not that bad. 24751[/snapback] I can't understand that logic - that money was money owed and therefore Newcastle's money. If Fat Fred hasn't enough money in his wallet for all those pies and has to quickly run around to the ATM to withdraw a bit more cash - did he only spend the money in his wallet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom_NUFC 0 Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] How? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 36813 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] How? 24774[/snapback] From a cash flow point of view it does make things a bit easier. I still reckon he was free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] How? 24774[/snapback] We bought Woodgate for £9m and sold him for £14m: £5m profit. We bought Jenas for £5m and sold him for £8m: £3m profit. It's not like we're £16m worse off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 From a cash flow point of view it does make things a bit easier. I still reckon he was free. 24777[/snapback] I thought you didn't like management speak, David? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9065 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 (edited) We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] How? 24774[/snapback] We bought Woodgate for £9m and sold him for £14m: £5m profit. We bought Jenas for £5m and sold him for £8m: £3m profit. It's not like we're £16m worse off. 24779[/snapback] We sold Jenas for 7m. FACT. We also have to pass some doshto Nottingham. Probably also a fact. Edited August 31, 2005 by Isegrim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] It is common sense, I'll agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 36813 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 From a cash flow point of view it does make things a bit easier. I still reckon he was free. 24777[/snapback] I thought you didn't like management speak, David? 24785[/snapback] Just cos I'm right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 There isi no sign in the Interim Accounts for 2005 that the debt owed to us suddenly shot up - which it would have done if theWoodgate money hadn't been paid - I reckon Fred has had his hands on it all year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9065 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 There isi no sign in the Interim Accounts for 2005 that the debt owed to us suddenly shot up - which it would have done if theWoodgate money hadn't been paid - I reckon Fred has had his hands on it all year 24798[/snapback] Though, I've heard the Newcastle balance sheets aren't exactly very trustworthy. The PLC is also a bit lenient when it comes to stock market anouncements... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] How? 24774[/snapback] We bought Woodgate for £9m and sold him for £14m: £5m profit. We bought Jenas for £5m and sold him for £8m: £3m profit. It's not like we're £16m worse off. 24779[/snapback] No, you see that's exactly what we are. We ultimately paid 16 million for the player, don't confuse the issue with where the cash is resting or what form it's currently in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] How? 24774[/snapback] We bought Woodgate for £9m and sold him for £14m: £5m profit. We bought Jenas for £5m and sold him for £8m: £3m profit. It's not like we're £16m worse off. 24779[/snapback] No, you see that's exactly what we are. We ultimately paid 16 million for the player, don't confuse the issue with where the cash is resting or what form it's currently in. 24809[/snapback] I see, so if you buy a new car for £5000, then sell your old one for £2000, you are still down by £5000!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] How? 24774[/snapback] We bought Woodgate for £9m and sold him for £14m: £5m profit. We bought Jenas for £5m and sold him for £8m: £3m profit. It's not like we're £16m worse off. 24779[/snapback] No, you see that's exactly what we are. We ultimately paid 16 million for the player, don't confuse the issue with where the cash is resting or what form it's currently in. 24809[/snapback] I see, so if you buy a new car for £5000, then sell your old one for £2000, you are still down by £5000!? 24830[/snapback] How much did the car cost? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] How? 24774[/snapback] We bought Woodgate for £9m and sold him for £14m: £5m profit. We bought Jenas for £5m and sold him for £8m: £3m profit. It's not like we're £16m worse off. 24779[/snapback] No, you see that's exactly what we are. We ultimately paid 16 million for the player, don't confuse the issue with where the cash is resting or what form it's currently in. 24809[/snapback] I see, so if you buy a new car for £5000, then sell your old one for £2000, you are still down by £5000!? 24830[/snapback] Do you drive a Lada by any chance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] How? 24774[/snapback] We bought Woodgate for £9m and sold him for £14m: £5m profit. We bought Jenas for £5m and sold him for £8m: £3m profit. It's not like we're £16m worse off. 24779[/snapback] No, you see that's exactly what we are. We ultimately paid 16 million for the player, don't confuse the issue with where the cash is resting or what form it's currently in. 24809[/snapback] I see, so if you buy a new car for £5000, then sell your old one for £2000, you are still down by £5000!? 24830[/snapback] How much did the car cost? 24835[/snapback] To you £3000. You already owned an asset worth £2000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] How? 24774[/snapback] We bought Woodgate for £9m and sold him for £14m: £5m profit. We bought Jenas for £5m and sold him for £8m: £3m profit. It's not like we're £16m worse off. 24779[/snapback] No, you see that's exactly what we are. We ultimately paid 16 million for the player, don't confuse the issue with where the cash is resting or what form it's currently in. 24809[/snapback] I see, so if you buy a new car for £5000, then sell your old one for £2000, you are still down by £5000!? 24830[/snapback] How much did the car cost? 24835[/snapback] To you £3000. You already owned an asset worth £2000. 24838[/snapback] You said you're self employed - can I just ask if you do your own accounts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] How? 24774[/snapback] We bought Woodgate for £9m and sold him for £14m: £5m profit. We bought Jenas for £5m and sold him for £8m: £3m profit. It's not like we're £16m worse off. 24779[/snapback] No, you see that's exactly what we are. We ultimately paid 16 million for the player, don't confuse the issue with where the cash is resting or what form it's currently in. 24809[/snapback] I see, so if you buy a new car for £5000, then sell your old one for £2000, you are still down by £5000!? 24830[/snapback] Do you drive a Lada by any chance? 24836[/snapback] No. I don't know why anyone would buy a new car. It is the single easiest way of throwing away a lot of money. Are you one of those people who likes to make out he's doing well by buying overpriced cars? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] How? 24774[/snapback] We bought Woodgate for £9m and sold him for £14m: £5m profit. We bought Jenas for £5m and sold him for £8m: £3m profit. It's not like we're £16m worse off. 24779[/snapback] No, you see that's exactly what we are. We ultimately paid 16 million for the player, don't confuse the issue with where the cash is resting or what form it's currently in. 24809[/snapback] I see, so if you buy a new car for £5000, then sell your old one for £2000, you are still down by £5000!? 24830[/snapback] How much did the car cost? 24835[/snapback] To you £3000. You already owned an asset worth £2000. 24838[/snapback] So was the asset you already had a gift from your Dad, or did you have to buy that too? Because if you had to buy it, you can't really offset the figure against the sum you spent on the new car can you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 We've still paid £16m regardless. 24756[/snapback] Yes, of course we have, but as that money hasn't been recieved, it does make it easier though. 24768[/snapback] How? 24774[/snapback] We bought Woodgate for £9m and sold him for £14m: £5m profit. We bought Jenas for £5m and sold him for £8m: £3m profit. It's not like we're £16m worse off. 24779[/snapback] No, you see that's exactly what we are. We ultimately paid 16 million for the player, don't confuse the issue with where the cash is resting or what form it's currently in. 24809[/snapback] I see, so if you buy a new car for £5000, then sell your old one for £2000, you are still down by £5000!? 24830[/snapback] How much did the car cost? 24835[/snapback] To you £3000. You already owned an asset worth £2000. 24838[/snapback] You said you're self employed - can I just ask if you do your own accounts? 24842[/snapback] Yes I do. What's your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now