AgentAxeman 82 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 I dont understand! he's an ILLEGAL immigrant. so fuck if he's got a cat/lass/couple of pots and pans. send the fooka back as its against international law (ie. ILLEGAL) for him to be here! ffs, this country is beyond belief! International Law? Eh? Irrespective of whether the judgement is correct (I don't know anything about the case other than what it says in the Mail), it's people taking that inflamatory bollocks at face value that beggars belief. The comments are hilarious and scary with equal measure as well. "BNP all the way for me" etc. just because you dont like the the Mail or the BNP that doesnt mean everybody has to agree with you, but the fact is, if he's facing deportation in the 1st place then it must be because he's here ILLEGALLY. come on, think about it. the term 'ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT' has the word 'ILLEGAL' in it. that means its 'ILLEGAL' for said person to be here. its people that are dissmissive of said 'inflamatory bollocks' who are really scary as they are avoiding the issue. Illegal you say? Where have I said everyone has to agree with me btw? The FACT (see I can use capslock too) is the government thought he was here ILLEGALLY but the courts have ruled he has a LEGAL right to stay here. I didn't even say I thought the decision was correct, all I was saying was it's probably not the most balanced view you're getting from the Mail. The funny thing is though that all the people commenting there (many of whom live abroad ironically) are going on about Britain going to the dogs/cats when and saying it wouldn't happen elsewhere when I would say (given the ruling was based on HUMAN RIGHTS) that the judgement was made based on European Law we have signed up to via the Human Rights act. are you saying the government made a mistake signing up to the human rights act? (Joke!) I'm not going to argue about the EU or the human rights act cos quite simply i disagree with both of them (not the motives, just the implementation of both). just seems very strange to me that (Great)?? Britain thought it was illegal for him to stay, yet the Eu courts thought it was ok cos he has a cat (i know there was more). as i said earlier, he's broken the law and got away with it. does this not boil your piss? cos it sure does mine!! oh, and its Caps Lock (2 words). Its only on the button, ffs!! OOoooooOOO HE'S BROKEN THE LAW!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 I wonder if he read beyond the headline tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 70 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Imagine if he had a cling of rats. Mail front page innit...."Rat immigrant springs trap". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 14059 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 oh, and its Caps Lock (2 words). Its only on the button, ffs!! It's "it's", for that matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelus71 4 Posted October 21, 2009 Author Share Posted October 21, 2009 The whole thing is a cat-astrophe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Cat and Dog Shleters from Glasgow to Dover will be delighted by this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 38787 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 The whole issue is rather petty. Coat..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 14059 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 The whole issue is rather petty. Coat..... Class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now