Christmas Tree 4005 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Maybe you're making it up as you go along. Boring. Can't you get an account on N-O or just melt? Oh dear, still sulking. Here's a forum you might be more suited too. http://www.bbc.co.uk/cbeebies/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13915 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Speaking of which haven't you got a Jeremy Kylesque amount of kids to attend to? Get back to the housework. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4005 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Speaking of which haven't you got a Jeremy Kylesque amount of kids to attend to? Just on here Thomas, just on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irrelevant Nick KP 0 Posted June 6, 2011 Author Share Posted June 6, 2011 (edited) James, Neville, Cole, Terry, Rio, Beckham, Lampard, Gerrard, Joe Cole, Rooney, Owen.. James #: Good, but not exceptional and prone to howlers. Neville: Excellent, but not world class. Ashley Cole. Not quite excellent. Carvalho better. Terry. Over-rated. Rio. Over-rated Beckham. Non-match-fit in 2002, that was obvious. And in 2006 people were bashing Sven for picking him. Der! Lampard. Has never been as good for England as he has for Chelsea Gerrard. Did well when Sven used him as a forward, depiste the player protesting. Joe Cole. World-class, and a gem of a player at that time. Rooney. He can be discounted, sinced Sven never got knocked out with him on the pitch Owen. Went off the boil in 2002-2004 and never regained his old athleticism. Edited June 6, 2011 by Nick-Kielce-Poland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 28003 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Nick, are you Sven's agent? I just can't imagine anyone starting a thread about the England team, (tempted to finish the sentence there, like), and bringing up the idea of Sven Goran Errikson coming back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 James, Neville, Cole, Terry, Rio, Beckham, Lampard, Gerrard, Joe Cole, Rooney, Owen.. James #: Good, but not exceptional and prone to howlers. Neville: Excellent, but not world class. Ashley Cole. Not quite excellent. Carvalho better. Terry. Over-rated. Rio. Over-rated Beckham. Non-match-fit in 2002, that was obvious. And in 2006 people were bashing Sven for picking him. Der! Lampard. Has never been as good for England as he has for Chelsea Gerrard. Did well when Sven used him as a forward, depiste the player protesting. Joe Cole. World-class, and a gem of a player at that time. Rooney. He can be discounted, sinced Sven never got knocked out with him on the pitch Owen. Went off the boil in 2002-2004 and never regained his old athleticism. Carvalho's a centre-back tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 20234 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Nick, are you Sven's agent? I just can't imagine anyone starting a thread about the England team, (tempted to finish the sentence there, like), and bringing up the idea of Sven Goran Errikson coming back. he's either blatantly on the wind up or just really dim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irrelevant Nick KP 0 Posted June 6, 2011 Author Share Posted June 6, 2011 he's either blatantly on the wind up or just really dim Do you like Sugar Puffs? :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveTheBobby 1 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 "Nick, are you Sven's agent?" He might be Tight Grip though ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 28003 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Nick, are you Sven's agent? I just can't imagine anyone starting a thread about the England team, (tempted to finish the sentence there, like), and bringing up the idea of Sven Goran Errikson coming back. he's either blatantly on the wind up or just really dim An attention seeker or a thick cunt? He's doing himself no favours, either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil 6 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 (edited) Sven got Paul Scholes to retire early, him and Brian Barwick need shooting. Edited June 6, 2011 by Phil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irrelevant Nick KP 0 Posted June 6, 2011 Author Share Posted June 6, 2011 (edited) I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours. What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim. Paul Scholes chose to retire early. Edited June 6, 2011 by Nick-Kielce-Poland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 20234 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours.What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim. yes, it's the posts following yours that are moronic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irrelevant Nick KP 0 Posted June 6, 2011 Author Share Posted June 6, 2011 I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours.What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim. yes, it's the posts following yours that are moronic I think so, yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 20234 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Sven got Paul Scholes to retire early, him and Brian Barwick need shooting. that was a shocker. possession of the ball is so key in international football and he basically sidelined and ultimately forced out england's only central midfielder that knew the value of ball retention. gerrard, lampard and beckham all play way too many hollywood balls that don't come off. scholes knows you keep moves ticking along by keeping the ball. for what it's worth nick, i think sven did ok as england manager but no better than that. he did the very minimum that was expected of an england manager with tht set of players but was never able to take the team to the final stages of a tournament. quarter finals are ok, but not that much to write home about. i doubt he would inspire the current lot to do any better plus the nation and the media have had enough of him. to suggest he comes back is just daft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Only one man for the job now and thats Arry. I dont like the bloke I've split your post apart for you so you can use quote either, depending on how he gets on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13915 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic I thought mine was really good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 28003 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours.What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim. Paul Scholes chose to retire early. You've had a few waxers as topics, Nick. You have to give people the benefit of the doubt, but in your case, it wore out. LM reckons you're the only person he's put on ignore. Now LM likes an argument, but even he can't be arsed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irrelevant Nick KP 0 Posted June 6, 2011 Author Share Posted June 6, 2011 I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours.What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim. Paul Scholes chose to retire early. You've had a few waxers as topics, Nick. You have to give people the benefit of the doubt, but in your case, it wore out. LM reckons you're the only person he's put on ignore. Now LM likes an argument, but even he can't be arsed. The feeling is mutual with LM, and as I have said, I find most of the first responses to this topic, utterly moronic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Scholes was messed about and played out of position to appease players with big egos like Lampard and Gerrard. I think that's why he couldn't be arsed in the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4005 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Only one man for the job now and thats Arry. I dont like the bloke I've split your post apart for you so I can mis-quote either, depending on how he gets on. Fixed it for ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours.What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim. Paul Scholes chose to retire early. You've had a few waxers as topics, Nick. You have to give people the benefit of the doubt, but in your case, it wore out. LM reckons you're the only person he's put on ignore. Now LM likes an argument, but even he can't be arsed. The feeling is mutual with LM, and as I have said, I find most of the first responses to this topic, utterly moronic. I found out the other day that idiots are more stupid than moron's IQ Range Classification 50-69 Moron 20-49 Imbecile below 20 Idiot We should all do IQ tests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 28003 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours.What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim. Paul Scholes chose to retire early. You've had a few waxers as topics, Nick. You have to give people the benefit of the doubt, but in your case, it wore out. LM reckons you're the only person he's put on ignore. Now LM likes an argument, but even he can't be arsed. The feeling is mutual with LM, and as I have said, I find most of the first responses to this topic, utterly moronic. Maybe the topic gets the responses it deserves? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irrelevant Nick KP 0 Posted June 6, 2011 Author Share Posted June 6, 2011 (edited) Howmanheyman you may think it does, but clearly I don't agree, since, as I've said, I find those responses which I mentioned, totally moronic. Edited June 6, 2011 by Nick-Kielce-Poland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Do, you, really, Nick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now