Another conspiracy theory

[manc-mag 1]

People who come up with these kind of theories are like Leazes tbh, they'll bleat on about conspiracy theories despite any evidence to the contrary. Controlled demolition of the twin towers? Oh, so the world's media and thousands of eye witnesses just imagined those planes flying into them then.

141485[/snapback]

 

I highly doubt planes would be enough to fell the Twin Towers. The collapse has all the hallmarks of controlled demolition.

141506[/snapback]

 

Or a milkfloat

[Ted Maul 0]

People who come up with these kind of theories are like Leazes tbh, they'll bleat on about conspiracy theories despite any evidence to the contrary. Controlled demolition of the twin towers? Oh, so the world's media and thousands of eye witnesses just imagined those planes flying into them then.

141485[/snapback]

 

I highly doubt planes would be enough to fell the Twin Towers. The collapse has all the hallmarks of controlled demolition.

141506[/snapback]

Out of interest, do you have any expert knowledge with which to back this up?

141508[/snapback]

 

I was waiting for that

 

No, I don't but there have been several incidents where planes have hit large buildings before and since 9/11 and I can't remember any of them collapsing that soon if at all. The way the building fell looks like a controlled demolition aswell. How many buildings would fall completely straight after suffering a impact to only one side? There would have to be a fairly liberal covering of something more than just airplane fuel to melt and weaken that much steel in that short space of time.

[Gemmill 34541]

People who come up with these kind of theories are like Leazes tbh, they'll bleat on about conspiracy theories despite any evidence to the contrary. Controlled demolition of the twin towers? Oh, so the world's media and thousands of eye witnesses just imagined those planes flying into them then.

141485[/snapback]

 

I highly doubt planes would be enough to fell the Twin Towers. The collapse has all the hallmarks of controlled demolition.

141506[/snapback]

Out of interest, do you have any expert knowledge with which to back this up?

141508[/snapback]

 

What I like best is the firm assertion that it has "all the hallmarks of controlled demolition". Like he's an expert in the field of explosives rather than a 6th former that likes a good story.

[Guest alex]

The best program I've seen about it was the one on the Discovery Channel that explained why they collapsed the way they did. It seemed credible and backed up by expert testimony to me and had none of the sensationalism you get with all the conspiracy theories. Bit less exciting obviously.

[adios 717]

I was waiting for that 

 

No, I don't but there have been several incidents where planes have hit large buildings before and since 9/11 and I can't remember any of them collapsing that soon if at all. The way the building fell looks like a controlled demolition aswell. How many buildings would fall completely straight after suffering a impact to only one side? There would have to be a fairly liberal covering of something more than just airplane fuel to melt and weaken that much steel in that short space of time.

141516[/snapback]

 

I'm pretty sure I've seen the same stuff you're basing those opinions on, they had an agenda. The only unbiased conclusion I could draw from them is that I honestly don't have the knowledge to reach the same conclusions that they wanted me to reach.

 

I think this kind of theory just helps to discredit genuine "conspiracy theories". Falsified documents might not be as exciting, but they have far more impact in the real world.

[Renton 17812]

People who come up with these kind of theories are like Leazes tbh, they'll bleat on about conspiracy theories despite any evidence to the contrary. Controlled demolition of the twin towers? Oh, so the world's media and thousands of eye witnesses just imagined those planes flying into them then.

141485[/snapback]

 

I highly doubt planes would be enough to fell the Twin Towers. The collapse has all the hallmarks of controlled demolition.

141506[/snapback]

Out of interest, do you have any expert knowledge with which to back this up?

141508[/snapback]

 

I was waiting for that

 

No, I don't but there have been several incidents where planes have hit large buildings before and since 9/11 and I can't remember any of them collapsing that soon if at all. The way the building fell looks like a controlled demolition aswell. How many buildings would fall completely straight after suffering a impact to only one side? There would have to be a fairly liberal covering of something more than just airplane fuel to melt and weaken that much steel in that short space of time.

141516[/snapback]

 

Name one incident of a plane that hit a building that is remotely similar? Can you, just one?

 

I agree with Alex that this conspiracy rubbish is an insult to those that died, and further is an insult to common sense and intelligence.

 

Regards the latest favourite theory, a plane didn't hit the pentagon, see the snopes site. I remember watching the coverage live at the time it happened, and several credible witnesses described exactly what happened. I suppose they were all planted and the media is also in on the conspiracy? Jesus wept.

[Gemmill 34541]

People who come up with these kind of theories are like Leazes tbh, they'll bleat on about conspiracy theories despite any evidence to the contrary. Controlled demolition of the twin towers? Oh, so the world's media and thousands of eye witnesses just imagined those planes flying into them then.

141485[/snapback]

 

I highly doubt planes would be enough to fell the Twin Towers. The collapse has all the hallmarks of controlled demolition.

141506[/snapback]

Out of interest, do you have any expert knowledge with which to back this up?

141508[/snapback]

 

I was waiting for that

 

No, I don't but there have been several incidents where planes have hit large buildings before and since 9/11 and I can't remember any of them collapsing that soon if at all. The way the building fell looks like a controlled demolition aswell. How many buildings would fall completely straight after suffering a impact to only one side? There would have to be a fairly liberal covering of something more than just airplane fuel to melt and weaken that much steel in that short space of time.

141516[/snapback]

 

Name one incident of a plane that hit a building that is remotely similar? Can you, just one?

 

I agree with Alex that this conspiracy rubbish is an insult to those that died, and further is an insult to common sense and intelligence.

 

Regards the latest favourite theory, a plane didn't hit the pentagon, see the snopes site. I remember watching the coverage live at the time it happened, and several credible witnesses described exactly what happened. I suppose they were all planted and the media is also in on the conspiracy? Jesus wept.

141559[/snapback]

 

Aye, it would be impossible to pull something off on this scale and keep everyone quiet. When you look at all the quotes on that clip, most of them come from nobodies. One of them is attributed to someone called "Skarlett". No second name. Am I supposed to accept a stripper's expert opinion on the matter?

 

Having said that, Kennedy definitely wasn't killed by Oswald.

[Guest alex]

I reckon Kennedy was shot by Oswald acting alone, but we've been down that route. We landed on the moon too

[adios 717]

I'm going to believe Gemmill's version of events, he was there.

[Happy Face 29]

I reckon Kennedy was shot by Oswald acting alone, but we've been down that route. We landed on the moon too

141566[/snapback]

 

You're an astronaut? I thought you were a civil servant or something?

[Renton 17812]

Thing is, history is fascinating enough without these bollocks theories. I mean Jesus wept, even when there is multiple film footage of the towers being hit, people still have to invent stuff like they were rigged with explosives? Why for God's sake?

 

FFS, the US couldn't even fake a WMD in Iraq, could they?

[Renton 17812]

I reckon Kennedy was shot by Oswald acting alone, but we've been down that route. We landed on the moon too

141566[/snapback]

 

You're an astronaut? I thought you were a civil servant or something?

141576[/snapback]

 

So you can only accept something if you see it first-hand then? How do I know I was born and not created?

[Gemmill 34541]

I reckon Kennedy was shot by Oswald acting alone, but we've been down that route. We landed on the moon too

141566[/snapback]

 

You're an astronaut? I thought you were a civil servant or something?

141576[/snapback]

 

So you can only accept something if you see it first-hand then? How do I know I was born and not created?

141582[/snapback]

 

I believe that a supernerd like you was created in a lab from parts of lesser nerds tbh.

[Ted Maul 0]

I'm just going to ignore Renton because he is getting very close to bursting my bubble and disproving all the theories that i've mentioned in this thread

[adios 717]

I reckon Kennedy was shot by Oswald acting alone, but we've been down that route. We landed on the moon too

141566[/snapback]

 

You're an astronaut? I thought you were a civil servant or something?

141576[/snapback]

 

So you can only accept something if you see it first-hand then? How do I know I was born and not created?

141582[/snapback]

 

I think he was talking about "We landed on the moon".

 

I know Gemmill was created and not born.

[Guest alex]

I reckon Kennedy was shot by Oswald acting alone, but we've been down that route. We landed on the moon too

141566[/snapback]

 

You're an astronaut? I thought you were a civil servant or something?

141576[/snapback]

I used to be a civil servant for a brief spell about 10 years ago. HTT made the same mistake for some reason.

[Gemmill 34541]

I know Gemmill was created and not born.

141586[/snapback]

 

Sugar and spice and all things nice.

[Gemmill 34541]

I reckon Kennedy was shot by Oswald acting alone, but we've been down that route. We landed on the moon too

141566[/snapback]

 

You're an astronaut? I thought you were a civil servant or something?

141576[/snapback]

I used to be a civil servant for a brief spell about 10 years ago. HTT made the same mistake for some reason.

141588[/snapback]

 

It's cos you're such a lazy twat.

[Guest alex]

I reckon Kennedy was shot by Oswald acting alone, but we've been down that route. We landed on the moon too

141566[/snapback]

 

You're an astronaut? I thought you were a civil servant or something?

141576[/snapback]

I used to be a civil servant for a brief spell about 10 years ago. HTT made the same mistake for some reason.

141588[/snapback]

 

It's cos you're such a lazy twat.

141590[/snapback]

Touche and ditto.

[Renton 17812]

I reckon Kennedy was shot by Oswald acting alone, but we've been down that route. We landed on the moon too

141566[/snapback]

 

You're an astronaut? I thought you were a civil servant or something?

141576[/snapback]

I used to be a civil servant for a brief spell about 10 years ago. HTT made the same mistake for some reason.

141588[/snapback]

 

It's cos you're such a lazy twat.

141590[/snapback]

 

Alex, are you an accountant?

[Guest alex]

I know Gemmill was created and not born.

141586[/snapback]

 

Sugar and spice and all things nice.

141589[/snapback]

You're as far removed from being a little girl as is possible tbh.

[Guest alex]

I reckon Kennedy was shot by Oswald acting alone, but we've been down that route. We landed on the moon too

141566[/snapback]

 

You're an astronaut? I thought you were a civil servant or something?

141576[/snapback]

I used to be a civil servant for a brief spell about 10 years ago. HTT made the same mistake for some reason.

141588[/snapback]

 

It's cos you're such a lazy twat.

141590[/snapback]

 

Alex, are you an accountant?

141592[/snapback]

Nope. I'm not being mysterious, I'm just not sure what I actually do

[Happy Face 29]

I reckon Kennedy was shot by Oswald acting alone, but we've been down that route. We landed on the moon too

141566[/snapback]

 

You're an astronaut? I thought you were a civil servant or something?

141576[/snapback]

 

So you can only accept something if you see it first-hand then? How do I know I was born and not created?

141582[/snapback]

 

 

I'm willing to bet Alex hasn't been on the moon, he's a conspiracist. Fair enough if he's Alexander Kaleri but I doubt that.

[Jill 0]

So are American Airlines in on the scam too?  FFS.

141271[/snapback]

 

Obviously they lost an aircraft, what is in question is what hit the pentagon.

141272[/snapback]

 

Another question would be "how do you lose an aircraft without anyone noticing?"

141274[/snapback]

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/5016068.stm