-
Posts
259 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by rabit71
-
i said from the start it was tongue in cheek fcb. and i also said "since you mentioned it, they arent based in london but in the bhamas" or something, which sparked of you saying it doesnt matter. meh. you didnt get a joke and tried to be arsey about it, why cant you just admit you were a bit of a prick? you just snapped at someone else because you were paranoid he meant you when he meant CT, maybe you should go lie down
-
i'd be fine if fcb would stop trying to get in my arse tbf
-
it was a joke fcb. if you still dont understand that even after all this you best make it something stronger than a pint, as i may need it to talk to you wihtout my brain melting
-
im a student!!! and uni doesnt start again til next month
-
"Why not just say you don't have a clue? Would be better than saying something as pathetic as that. " was fcb's opening line on this thread. to me that's him being a dick the "dodgy tax" bit was a joke about how them paying less tax because of the offshore business enables them (or as ewark pointed out correctly, their owner(s)) to keep more money, therefore enabling bigger "warchests" etc etc blah blah this has all been said. it was not a serious remark, and i really did not expect to have to defend it, as dodgy arry + offshore accounts = obvious joke. I don't see fcb's original post as crushing mine, as they are not mutually exclusive, if anything my point is just an addition to the good business sense which fcb mentioned. the argument sprung from fcb wanting to crush my point, but being unable to do so he resorted to making it personal. maybe it was just a follow on from the smith thread in which he tried the same. meh. i dont mind arguing, most of the time its a laugh haha. no offence to CT as im new and dont know anyone, but the way he was jumping in seemed to have more to do with wanting to be against fcb than be for me. i could be harsher but i wont, as i dont know the guy
-
i havent put any obstacles anywhere.... if i see you i see you i guess. you know what students are like for free beer though how will i know who to ask for my pint btw? what's on your shirt?
-
gradel rumour has been floating around for a couple of weeks now was squashed by their manager iirc shame, because as you say he fits the profile
-
mile castle is the other weatherspoons, just up the road from union rooms. used to be sports bar and why would i give someone on a messageboard my number also - wanting to meet someone to "discuss" things = classic keyboard warrior behaviour
-
yeah, i was always told not to give my number to strangers, i'll just tell you what im wearing. probably will be the home top from 1980, and to make it more obvious i'll wear 1 green converse and 1 white
-
ah come on, its a bit rude to offer a guy a pint and then request him to come to you isnt it? i don't know where i'll be yet. but i will definitely let you know, don't worry EDIT: this handily also replies to your other one about it being a secret. dont know where i'll be as i could be in one of the following: forth, tilleys, bodega, mile castle, goose (hope not), newcastle arms, rosies, or somewhere shitter
-
oz. ive said i'll let him know where i'll be... also - didnt try the same shit elsewhere, not trying to make a name for myself, im just not one to roll over when someone calls me a prick, sorry.
-
psssst. fcb. read my last post
-
triple post from a guy who wasnt going to reply to me? i'll be in town. dont know if i'll be going to match though i'll let you know wher ei'll be if you like (the wink is in reference to my previous usage of it, where i asked if you were trying to groom me)
-
fcb read my last post before you make yourself look even more stupid. mac referred to the original post, which wasnt from me, my joke was validated. of course u didnt get it, panicked, and started abusing me for it anyway and have continued even after it was proved correct, if unfunny.... and abuse me? imo you've been unoriginal, weak and a bit thick really
-
cheers fish mac - that wasnt my post, that was the OP, mine was a joke about tax dodging. and mac, you're falling into the same pitfall as fcb. starting argumentum ad hominem =/= starting argument
-
why do you ask questions you already know the answer to? it's poor chat. especially from someone who said they were leaving me alone
-
emotional? ive barely stopped smiling reading your posts why won't you look it up btw? you did for c.diff. there's no shame in not understanding things. im not ashamed to admit i dont understand some things. For example, i dont understand how an uneducated, unintelligent (well from what i've gathered so far) keyboard warrior such as yourself can have such arrogance when it comes to their own opinion. it makes no sense. is it just blind pigheadedness? i dont think i'll ever find this out though. you're lucky, you can just shout upstairs from the basement to your mam for help with things
-
im still waiting for you to look up what argumentum ad hominem means so you can try and save some of your credibility
-
i cant believe you actually walked into that argumentUM AD HOMINEM =/= argument i know you just admitted you never went to school but come on, there's no need to prove you're a dumbass
-
i didnt say you started the argument please look up what words mean before commenting on them thought you were going anyway?
-
really? after all that you finally stop replying to me? ok you're like c.diff because when it's around an abundance of watery shit is sure to follow
-
just a little point - i never drifted fcb, that was you. please get your facts right. you started the argumentum ad hominem on the smith thread and did it again on here. you claim to want to discuss football (which i tried to continue on both ocassions) yet fail to do it. you're all talk
-
that was a lot better. but now you're in danger of falling into your usual trap. just as you latched onto the "boring" insult and kept using it, you seem to be doing the same with the "crap patter" comment. shame really. oh, and since we're talking about repeating stuff, i'm still waiting for you to answer why you are like c.diff
-
that was a little better. and football related, nice. you did just show your arrogance once again though. do you not understand how internet arguments work? you and people who know/like you think you get the upperhand, i and people who like/know me think i do. it's how it always goes.