wolfy

The nature of light still isn't fully understood...but we won't go into that. So you know gravity exists even before you took into account any scientific evidence. How was this then? Are you going to say ' because things fall'..? Was it Newton and the apple falling on his head? Just tell me how you know gravity exists. Let's pretend that you've read no books or not used scientific theories from others. Tell me what makes gravity real to you. I've already gave you my reasons for denpressure as gravity. I explained it as a force, too. Instead of just telling me that you know gravity is real....because.....just tell me how you personally verified it.

Gravity has not been fully understood because it's simply made up to give a reason as to why Earth and the so called planets, etc, do what they do. As I've said before and before that. I am not against all of science. I'm questioning the science of Earth as a rotating globe, plus space in it's entirety. Also, If I question one aspect of news I owe it to myself to question it all. It doesn't mean everything is lies. It just means that I'm not just going to accept stuff on the word of speakers operating from a script. I know video can be faked, I know photos can be faked. I also know that actors can make something appear real by being good at what they are paid to do. I also know that many people would step on their own granny for fame and fortune. Those people who are paid to read the news could be as honest as the day is long. If they're given a script to read out, they do so. Here's a question for you. Answer it honestly. Tell me how you know gravity exists to be so sure that what I'm saying is nonsense.

Of course it doesn't make any sense. Why would it make sense when you know that Earth is a rotating globe spinning round a sun with a moon spinning round Earth and stars all spinning around galaxies and so on and so on. Why believe atmospheric pressure is the reason why everything happens on Earth when you can have gravity that cannot be explained as a force by ANYONE. I asked for the pictures because I wanted to see if they were taken with a camera with a fish eye lens. I do have a genuine belief that many news events are skirting around the real truth and some that are blatantly made up. I bet there's many on here that do, so if you even question one, you owe it to yourself to question it all.

You're all gonna love Colback. He's just the type of player we need with the flair that we have; as he's a grafter from the first minute to the last.

We just keep doing what we are doing, because we are replacing outgoing players with better quality incoming players, barring the odd want away players. Our squad is becoming stronger in quality. We aren't simply buying just to fill gaps with just any player.

That's all many people have to rely on. Faith. It's about using our minds to distinguish truth from fantasy or trying to psycho-analyse someone to find out if they are sane or insane, as it's a very fine line.

It depends on how you view science. I agree that Earth science is largely based on provable evidence. I have no qualms whatsoever with that. I've never said any other. There's some science that is fed to us that isn't provable...which we are told to accept. I've explained what that science is, which is what I'm questioning. As far as me posting anywhere, I wouldn't worry yourself over it. I don't worry about the amount of posts you have. It's simply not an issue. I thought you had given up on me a while back when you said you were not going to waste anymore time on me, yet here you are going against what you said. I suppose we all do that at times, so it's no big deal. I mean, you probablt find what I'm saying interesting but are afraid to admit it in front of other posters because it might destroy any street cred you think you have. I really don't know. It's just a guess. Anyway, if you have any questions, I'll try and answer them as best I can. Cheers.

I'd like to see your pictures that show a curvature of the Earth, if you don't mind. So you want to know here the edge is? There is no edge. I don't follow a flat Earth as I've said before. I don't follow the ships falling off edges and what not. Earth is not flat. It's slightly concave. The oceans are in the bowl and land is jutting out from the bowl edges, all the way around Earth's circle. Nobody gets much further than the inner rim, which people assume is Antarctica. The inner rim circles the entire Earth. Trekking into that rim will render you a frozen statue in short order. Anything mechanical that goes further will soon break down. The oxygen runs out and is replaced by white outs of nitrogen, then further towards the dome foundation, it becomes colder and colder until you hit the dome itself. Obviously this is not possible but hopefully you can see what I mean. I don't expect you to even want to try and understand it. It's your choice what you go with. You asked, so I answered.

The grass isn't always greener on the other side as we've seen with many a player leaving us. The money is better for them but rarely do they enhance their football careers. If Debuchy doesn't settle quickly, he could find himself playing second fiddle for his stay at Arsenal.

Sorry about that, it's just that I don't drink filtered coffee and was feeling a bit left out.

All clubs are selling clubs and all clubs are buying clubs. We sell no more players than any other club. If we are a selling club because of Carroll, Ba, Cabaye and Debuchy....how many of those players did we sell because we didn't want them? How many did we sell because the player forced the sale?

I drink yorkshire tea nowadays.

If the players that come to us then decide to leave because we don't match their ambitions, then who's fault is it? I mean, if they are as ambitious and as good as they make out then they should be helping the club into the ambitious position they desire. What the players really mean is, they are not prepared to stay and achieve their ambition because they prefer to find bigger clubs that pay much higher wages, or in some cases , smaller clubs. I mean, was Sammi Nasri being ambitious when he left Arsenal for Man city or just a greedy little bastard? I want players at Newcastle united who are prepared to give their last breath for the time they are here and to nail their colours to the mast to help the club achieve a better standing. I couldn't give a shit if Messi signed for us, then bailed out in short order. He would be a shithouse to me, unless he stipulated that he was here short term to help us out. We knew that with Remy. We also knew that with Ba...so I wasn't arsed when they went, even though they done the business for us short term. If their minds are elsewhere, then they cease to exist for me, once they deck out. I want players like Coloccini and Jonas in terms of loyalty and mindset and obviously the required quality. I want to see that type of player who actually remains a fan after leaving the club on the right terms. Obviously the big clubs are going to tempt players away at certain times...and when that happens, we have to play hard ball and get the best possible price...which we do. Years ago under Shepherd, we would have let those players go for peanuts. One thing about Newcastle, now...is...we don't get messed around or fleeced. If clubs don't play ball either transfers in or out, we simply stand fast. It might not be a perfect fans policy, because it means we lose out on some players whilst gaining on outgoings...but over the long term by hook and by crook, we will ultimately end up as a true strongarm club in the premier, whilst the money no object star chasing clubs are shaking their piggy banks for scraps.

A simple question: do you think that we could have been sold a lie so big that we all simply follow it unconditionally, based on faith rather than physical evidence?

I eat anything that I like to. If I eat anything that causes me grief, I leave it alone. You're welcome to listen to anyone who tells you what to eat. All I'm saying is, trust your own body.

I'm sure you know we get told all kinds of clap trap all the time as regards diets and such.

Nothing. You don't need a doctor, you just need to lay off what's causing the problem. It's your body telling you that it doesn't want it.

I agree. Too much water can also be harmful. Too much food can also be harmful. Too much alcohol can. If people start eating spoonfuls of salt then they need to stop. The issue is, how much is too harmful, with anything? If you ate a spoonful of salt, your body would reject it by making you spew up. It will do the same with bad food. It's about knowing your own body. Some people don;t listen to their own body, they reject what it's telling them. This becomes worse when addictive things are put into the body, whether that's drugs, alcohol, and stuff to that effect. Look back over the last 20 years or so and find out what they once told you was good for you that is now bad. Now look at what they thought was good for you but was deemed bad but is now good. They are playing god with us. The same doctor that tells you to cut spicy food out is the very same doctor that's eating curries on a regular basis and drinking spirits, etc. Our trouble is following trends.

What's the point in any conspiracy?

I agree but then again, most of the country eat very similar stuff, especially in the built up areas. Look around you and see how many people are dropping down dead or are knackered by the time they are 50/60. There's still 80/90 year olds still walking to the shops and doing their own chores. Did they get to that stage by eating lettuce and what not every day? How you want to perceive it all is up to you. I don't trust these nutritionists at the top. Don't eat too many eggs. Don't eat too much red meat. don't eat white bread, eat brown. Don't eat fried breakfasts, grill them and little of it. I could go on and on but you get my drift, because that's what we are told. What's good or bad for you? Your Doctor will tell you when you go there with a problem. The Doctor will say. "do you smoke, do you drink, do you eat fried food, spicy food." If you answer yes, you get told to cut it all out and if you have to, just drink 12 units a week - half a pint is a unit, so 6 pints a week. Live the healthy way on all the foods that do you good and taste so bland that you wonder what the point is. The point is easy. If you don't follow what theys ay, you die of a stroke or heart attack or what not. Notice how they never ask you how much chocolate of Dr pepper you drink. the very stuff that wrecks your body but gives your brain such a high. It's that stuff that your body can't tell you about because it's busy doing a Ferris Beullers car park attendants run around, jumping for joy at the addiction. It's not salt that's killing people. It's the stuff that forced on people....on kids that's killing people and ailing them. Try telling your kid that he can't have Dr pepper or chocolate, etc. They don't drink it because it tastes just nice. They dr8ink it because it is addictive, just like coke is and many other things. Get fit, make your body stronger while your younger. Go to the gym and eat healthily, whilst spooning cratine and other protein powders into your body. Pop a few vitamin pills and all is well. But is it? That's not for me to tell people to decide. That's for myself to decide. What people do with their life is up to them. My life is in my hands. If my body tells me something is not agreeing with me or I feel lethargic ,etc, on it, I'll bin it and eat the stuff that I feel good on. Weirdly, white bread bloats me. It didn't use to, years and years ago, except now, some of it you can actually taste chemicals in it, like extremely mild bleach, especially in Warburtons bread, which I don't eat anymore.

Aye. Instead of their 20,s 30,s and 40,s these days. The old folk who are in their 80's, 90's and some even getting a nice letter from the queen. Aye, they probably ate special K for brekky and tinned Mackerel fillets with omega 3 in, no to mention the abundance of fruit and veg they had at hand. I mean, I doubt they would be eating fatty meats or bread dipped in dripping.

No. It's because my surname is wolf.

When there was no such thing as fridges, etc, things were preserved in vats of salt, like meats, etc. Don't listen to everything you get told by people who play god in the nutritional game. Put your faith in your own body. Your own body tells you what is good or bad for you, not god playing people who decide one thing is healthy then 10 years later tell you it's not healthy after all.

Your body needs salt. We can obviously argue the pro's and cons about it all, just as we can argue about lots of nutrients. Salt is better for you than the egg heads make out. That's my opinion and nobody has to accept it.

The truth is, you don't know. All you know is what you decide is the truth or you accept as the truth. I'm not telling you to believe one word I say. I'm asking you to basically use your own mind to question what you believe is the absolute truth, to see if that absolute truth you stick to, is exactly that and cannot be anything else. The decision anyone makes is entirely up to them. As I said before - I have my thoughts and I am one person giving my thoughts out. For me to expect anyone to take what I say as feasible, would be delusional. As far as mainstream teaching goes, I am delusional to think against some of it, because after all, surely what we are taught can't be mis- information, can it? If you question one thing about what you were brought up to believe, you owe it to yourself to question it all. You don't have to go all conspiracy nuts over it. Just simply weigh up the odds of some of it being - maybe intentional lies or deflection of the truth, whichever way you want to view it. Most people would prefer to simply go with the flow. It is what it is and that's that, kind of thing. That's fair enough as far as I'm concerned. Just remember though. All but the purest human beings have a price they will accept to aid in the spinning of lies. It may be simple fibs to them in the small scheme of things, yet could be a massive lie in the cold light of day that they realise as time goes on. I get told time and time again how millions of people can't hide a conspiracy. It always crops up. The answer is simple. Millions of people don't have to hide anything. All they have to do is believe the few and follow the pattern set out. A newsreader can be given scripted news to read about a bunch of lies. The newsreader is conveying those lies to you, yet could be totally unaware that they are lies. A college science teacher can teach the class that the reason why they stay on Earth is due to gravity. That teacher can then explain that gravity is a force that pulls everything down towards the centre of Earth and all the rest of it. That teacher is simply teaching what he/she was taught to teach. They may believe every word of it in most cases This can be the same everywhere in the world that this model is taught. The reality is, there is no physical proof that the Earth is a globe and rotating. All we have to go on are pictures, TV, teachings that it is what they say it is. Ok, the arguments can be many that there is proof. Space rocket launches prove it, right? It could be true because I once saw Bruce Willis go up into space in one shuttle and Ben Affleck go up in another, so obviously space is real because they even dock with the space station then land on an asteroid. It looks real. It looks as real as all the other stuff we are shown, so I suppose it has to be accepted as real. It's easy to say, " ahhh but this is a movie and we know it is." How do you know all the rest aren't...seriously? You can believe your bragging neighbour is watching a 200 inch TV screen in his home if he/she tells you they are. They can even make you more convinced if they show you a picture of a 200 inch TV screen in a room, if you have never seen the inside of their room. No reason to doubt, right? There's also no reason to doubt that your neighbour also has a holiday villa if they show you a picture of it. They could keep telling you about all kinds of stuff. What happens as time goes on when they tell you they have a helicopter and a private jet? You start to doubt and want more proof, right? Assuming you're interested that is. I mean, you might just nod and brush it all off and just accept it for what it is and just call them bragging gits. The thng is, you have two choices. You either question it or you don't. By not questioning it, isn't going to change your life in any major matter, nor is just accepting it. It's down to how you view being lied to or potentially being told fibs. For me, the questioning had to start with the moon landings. Anyone who has studied this stuff and saw the footage, should see enough in it - to - at the very least, be very sceptical. The reality is, most people probably are a little bit sceptical of some of it - but not sceptical enough to warrant them questioning the whole set up to this very day. It's up to each individual to decide what is the truth and is the truth and fiction mixed, or has fantasy been turned into people's reality by the very people that put out other fantasies in movie scripts. If people can believe that someone remote controlled a camera to watch the lift off of Apollo from the moon and to track it's ascent - from Earth, even though it's allegedly rotating at over 1000 mph (we are told) , then I suppose I can understand why people will accept anything told to them by mainstream science. I personally don't buy into a lot of it.