jaythesouthernmag

dependant on chelsea and aresenal getting their act together, top 4 push in a couple of years isnt unlikely, nufc werent that ambitious under shephard and halls anyway ffs So maybe top 6 then depending on other teams. Does that warrant the levels of investment? Is it necessary to spend that much just to qualify for the Europa league? I take it you conceed Liverpool have no chance of winning the league

Anyone care to actually back their mouths up then? They will not finish top 4 this year,next year or the year after. Thats my opinion so let's have yours

http://www.iq-tests.eu/iq-test-Mental-retardation-430.html Okay clever cunt, where do you think Liverpool will finish next year? As you are supporting their big spending approach

Strop? I find you amusing that's why I respond to your shite and then off you go again.

You're at it again. IF

£55m on Carroll and Henderson?? So if that's the way forward then football is fucked beyond recognition Jay, stfu..... I don't give a flying fuck what you highlight, people getting off on a Liverpool wankathon. They struggled to a win over a championship side, sit below us in the league and after all the money they spent they still rely on Gerrard to pull them out the shit. They will be nowhere near City or Man u in the league for the foreseeable future if ever. Once Chelsea sort themselves out they will also be in the elite 3, the rest will battle for what's left. If anyone thinks that Liverpool will win the league is fucking deluded

"I don't think you would find any sane person who wouldn't have BA and Cisse together over Carroll. Notice the use of the word sane." How's that picky

Like what?

£55m on Carroll and Henderson?? So if that's the way forward then football is fucked beyond recognition

And you'll not be able to quote Leazes saying it either will you? Apart from "wheres the Carroll money" "never match the previous owners" " I am right chum" " you don't go to games so your opinions don't count" you can't really quote him on much because he refuses to give any answers. Not sure what your point is tho, you strike me as a bit of a picky fucker

Isn't Ashley offering financial stability as long as he owns the club? I would say its better to have a debt to him than to a bank or the inland revenue. I think in the next few years we could see a few more clubs going the way of Pompey and Rangers

It seems he has a decent relationship with Ashley, well he did get him to cough up for Cisse, which has got to be a good thing. Made a few dodgy tactical decisions and we have lost/drawn some games we should have won but overall I'm pretty pleased so far

Makes me laugh how Leazes thinks financial stability is a bad thing. Of course league position matters, 6th position is more than anyone would have thought at this stage of the season. Not sure what his hang up with the Wolves thing is, they have their natural position which is somewhere between the top of the championship and bottom of the premiership. Sound finances mean they won't do a Pompey or Leeds so I think their fans will be happy with that.

I don't think you would find any sane person who wouldn't have BA and Cisse together over Carroll. Notice the use of the word sane.

do they not have pubs in the south, you namby pamby idiot. Anyway, I've tried to explain and I'm not doing it again, other than try one last angle with you. Why didn't they sell Ameobi and/or Best and have Carroll, Ba and Cisse all on the books ? Yes we do and my guess is that we didn't sell Best and Ameobi is because we didn't get offered 3 times what they are actually worth. Still didn't answer my question either did you, which is very predictable

You brought it up then when into rant mode. I asked you a simple question. Who would you prefer the Dembas or Carroll?? Clearly you won't answer it and I'm not getting involved in one of your drunken,repetitive arguments.

The Carroll cash has been answered on many occasions. Nobody knows for sure but just because its not been spent in 1 window doesn't mean its been pocketed/witheld. Why the hang up? Is it about the quality of the player or the size of the fee? Just because we have signed players for modest fees they are clearly worth a lot more but I've never heard you praise them for it, funny that

Why will that make BA and Cisse play better? Typical Leazes answer there, don't you rate the Dembers? That's what I asked, nothing to do with money. 2 Dembas or Carroll what would you rather have, simple question

so who thinks that Andy Carroll wishes he had not won a Wembley Cup Winners Medal, instead of staying with a club who are selling their best players rather than play for a club that is aiming for the top positions again ? Maybe, for the record, this should be a poll Wembley cup? Is that a new one? Do you think Demba BA and Papiss Cisse will offer more than Carroll to the side?

Nothing wrong with being on a sound financial footing, as we are, as long as the team can compete, which we can. We definitely need more players tho and I'm sure it will happen in lines with the current transfer policy. Maybe a £200/300 mil debt would get a more realistic chance of top 4 and maybe we would still be fighting for 6th

how many times have Newcastle finished above Liverpool in the past 40 years, and who owned NUFC during those years ? Fred never owned the club chum

I asked him to give some credit then replied to his response, I'm not winding him up

JSM, stop being a complete shithead and start to see the bigger picture. I have a balanced view and give credit and dish out criticism where its due. You can't help yourself being negative all the time, which is pretty sad

Leazes stop being a complete dick and give a bit of credit where its due, you are getting really tedious

Like selling Carroll for £35m and buying BA and Cisse for just over 10 or flogging Nolan for 3 and buying Cabaye for 4 ? It baffles me how anyone can knock that Proves my point