McFaul

Sounds a lovely fella.

Been twice aye. Once against us and once against Dundee. It's the best atmosphere in Scotland on its' day. The atmosphere at this game stuck in my memory, just off the telly, I can remember how passionate they were, the centre half scores a volley from about 40 yards. They're passionate Hearts fans, and also many of them are BIGOTS. It's the only other ground you'll see UJs at every week.

http://www.soccer24-7.com/forum/showpost.php?p=170125&postcount=44 pmsl, nowt wrong with delusional passion though. Cringe. A little bit anyway. JawD is further up that page too if you look.

This is right and there are reasons for it in my view. Take me, I would like think most people who know me think I'm alright. Can be a bit of a argumentative wank in life and on here, and my lass will tell you I'm ridiculously childish for my age. However, the one thing I acknowledge about myself still in my early 30's, is how condescending I can be, I'm right and that's it, and most other people are clueless. The older I get the more I'm right, and the more people who disagree with me are wrong. When I'm LM or Toonpacks age I'll be unbearable, I agree there has to be a shelf life for this sort of thing.

The fact even you with your limited knowledge describe them as cousins, finishes you. You say SJP was a racist stadium like I don't know Up till 1988 you heard a racist chant at every game. Garth Crooks could've opened a market stall the amount of bananas that came his way every time he played here. Hearts will ALWAYS have links with Rangers, the fact they hate Celtic when everyone else in Scotland hates Rangers more tells you everything.

Is this deranged old fool still claiming Hearts have no links (and sectarian ones) with Rangers He makes it worse for himself. Anyone WITH HALF A CLUE, knows there are links between Hearts and Rangers. People have laughed at him all of the way through this thread, contradicted him massively, why does he make it worse for himself is the question?

The fact you're even debating it shows you just do not have a clue. You're out of your depth. I've been to Edinburgh, Glasgow and all over Scotland loads of time, worked with and know many Scots. I'm no where near as old as you, but what I am is a hundred times more knowledgable about football than you. To deny there's links between Hearts and Rangers over decades, not just odd seasons, is one more time, and surely this board has had enough, to admit you're beyond clueless.

http://www.thecourier.co.uk/News/Fife/article/18098/fife-police-vow-sectarianism-crackdown-will-beat-the-bigots.html http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/football/spl/2011/05/13/celtic-and-hearts-set-for-the-dock-over-bigoted-songs-during-night-of-hate-at-tynecastle-86908-23127142/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&sms_ss=facebook&at_xt=4dccf21021ffef01%2C0 It's not like it's an argument, Hearts fans lean to the Rangers side. Show me similar articles of sectarianism being widely reported about clubs in Scotland other than Rangers, Hearts and Celtic.

Toon Don answered your post before above here, perfectly. Neil Lennon is a wank, but Hearts remain a support Rangers fans get along with.

You couldn't be more incorrect. Why does everyone call Hearts "the wee huns"? The Neil Lennon incident would not have happened to a Rangers manager at Tynecastle that is a fact. While Hibs fans distance themselves from sectarianism, a huge portion of Hearts fans don't, and the likes of Toon Don and the Partick fans will back me up on this.

Before a ball was kicked I said we'd comfortably be top 7 last season, and I think we'll come 6th this season. Tottenham will not be the same next season 100%. The Chelsea players said one of the big things about AVB was he wasn't an effective communicator and alienates the bigger players early doors, their worst results in 15 seaons under him reflected this. Harry got an extra 20% out of the yids, that's not there now, rumours of Bale, VDV and Modric all leaving to play for big clubs, I think they'll 100% fall back a bit. We can come above them, we're nearly did last season with their best team in 50 years. Our team is ready made, they've played together a season, we know our strengths, we've gelled, we don't need to worry there. Liverpool do. They'll be starting from scratch, Arsenal's best player wants away, Chelsea losing Drogba will be absolutely massive, and the likes of Everton and Villa, they're getting older and they are what they are. Mid table plodders. 6th minimum for me, as long as no one major leaves.

I can't believe people are suggesting putting Rangers in to the third division is a punishment. Of course it's not a fucking punishment, it bugs me how many times I've said this, but Glasgow Rangers Football Club formed circa 1872 DON'T EXIST, they're gone. A new organisation has been formed for the supporters of the old club, "Newco", "Rangers FC 2012". They didn't exist a month ago, so why the fuck should they leap frog 20 clubs in the Scotch Second and Third Divisions, can someone explain to me why they should. They should be delighted a potential route in to the fourth tier is available to them, when it's not available to the likes of Cove and Whitehill Welfare. "It's to the detriment of Scottish football." Well there is a lot of evidence to the contrary as mentioned by Toon Don and others, fuck Celtic's need for competition, it'll make the European fight more exciting for the majority of the SPL for starters. The fact is everyone in Scotland is technically "British", and technically the majority of people in Scotland are presbyterian or protestant whatever you want to call it. Why then are Rangers THE most hated club in Scotland if you take away Hearts fans? Surely you'd think the terrorist supporting element of Celtic FC would mean they are the most hated. They're not. Why not? Because for a century Rangers have been an arrogant disgrace built on division and bigotry of society. They manipulated and controlled the SFA for years, and with Celtic have made winning the title there a closed shop. I wish the worst possible things on the club.

I write them every week, and I never ever go over three pages. 99% of employers don't want to read the bible, they want cold hard facts on two sides. As for going to four, well if its' filled with content like, "Nobel Peace Prize Winner" fine, if not try to avoid it. I know it's an obvious thing to say but be as relevant in every sentence as you possibly can be, and read it when you're happy with it but put yourself in the eyes of a potential employer, and how it would come across to you if you were taking someone on.

August Newcastle vs Tottenham - Sat 18 5:30pm ESPN Wigan vs Chelsea - Sun 19 1:30pm SKY Manchester City vs Southampton - Sun 19 4pm SKY Everton vs Manchester United - Mon 20 8pm SKY Swansea vs West Ham - Sat 25 12:45pm SKY Chelsea vs Newcastle - Sat 25 5:30pm ESPN Stoke vs Arsenal - Sun 26 1:30pm SKY Liverpool vs Manchester City - Sun 26 4pm SKY September West Ham vs Fulham - Sat 1 12:45pm SKY Manchester City vs QPR - Sat 1 5:30pm ESPN Liverpool vs Arsenal - Sun 2 1:30pm SKY Southampton vs Manchester United - Sun 2 4pm SKY Norwich vs West Ham - Sat 15 12:45pm SKY Sunderland vs Liverpool - Sat 15 5:30pm ESPN Reading vs Tottenham - Sun 16 4pm SKY Everton vs Newcastle - Mon 17 8pm SKY Swansea vs Everton - Sat 22 12:45pm SKY Liverpool vs Manchester United - Sun 23 1:30pm SKY Manchester City vs Arsenal - Sun 23 4pm SKY Arsenal vs Chelsea - Sat 29 12:45pm SKY Aston Villa vs West Brom - Sun 30 4pm SKY October QPR vs West Ham - Mon 1 8pm SKY Manchester City vs Sunderland - Sat 6 12:45pm SKY West Ham vs Arsenal - Sat 6 5:30pm ESPN Southampton vs Fulham - Sun 7 1:30pm SKY Newcastle vs Manchester United - Sun 7 4pm SKY Tottenham vs Chelsea - Sat 20 12:45pm SKY Norwich vs Arsenal - Sat 20 5:30pm ESPN Sunderland vs Newcastle - Sun 21 1:30pm SKY QPR vs Everton - Sun 21 4pm SKY Everton vs Liverpool - Sat 27 12:45pm SKY Manchester City vs Swansea - Sat 27 5:30pm ESPN Aston Villa vs Norwich - Sun 28 1:30pm SKY Chelsea vs Manchester United - Sun 28 4pm SKY Manchester United vs Tottenham - Sat 29 5:30pm ESPN November Manchester United vs Arsenal - Sat 3 12:45pm SKY West Ham vs Manchester City - Sat 3 5:30pm ESPN QPR vs Reading - Sun 4 1:30pm SKY Liverpool vs Newcastle United - Sun 4 4pm SKY West Brom vs Southampton - Mon 5 8pm SKY Aston Villa vs Manchester United - Sat 10 5:30pm SKY Manchester City vs Tottenham - Sun 11 1:30pm SKY Chelsea vs Liverpool - Sun 11 4pm SKY Arsenal vs Tottenham - Sat 17 12:45pm SKY Norwich vs Manchester United - Sat 17 5:30pm ESPN Fulham vs Sunderland - Sun 18 4pm SKY West Ham vs Stoke - Mon 19 8pm SKY Swansea vs Liverpool - Sat 24 12:45pm SKY Aston Villa vs Arsenal - Sat 24 5:30pm ESPN Sunderland vs West Brom - Sun 25 1:30pm SKY Chelsea vs Manchester City - Sun 25 4pm SKY Aston Villa vs Reading - Tue 27 8pm SKY Wigan vs Manchester City - Wed 28 8pm SKY Man City 9 Man Utd 9 Liverpool 8 Arsenal 8 Chelsea 7 Newcastle 6 Tottenham 6 West Ham 6 Aston Villa 5 Everton 5 Sunderland 4 Who the fuck wants to watch West Ham? Are Newcastle and Tottenham not more of a pull? Aside from these game, we'll be playing on Sunday a lot this season telly or not due to the Europa League.

...and while we're on about those fat pie eating twats, for every positive there are 100 negatives about them. Vietnam, Bay Of Pigs, you name it. The worst was bombing Nagasaki when they knew the Japs were about surrender. Cunts. Fuck them. Biggest evil in the world today collectively, regardless how many "enthusiastic" pro-plus pill popping twats there are in the country. See the yanks 1 in 20th of the world population, 1 fifth of the world's pollution. Disgrace of a nation.

"Jersey". It's not Bergerac son.

What I know about America which is fuck all really, the utter tramps are in the South they make mackems seem educated, and in the North East it's the equivalent of the South East of England.

It doesn't get that much coverage though, it's usually when there's an election on or a G8 summit, or 300 dead in some pathetic tornado. You think they'd move the thick cunts.

Well if I was born either species, I'd not know any different. I'd enjoy cheysey chips, and 4lb burgers like it was normal behaviour.

:lol: I'm going to use that as a sig.

They didn't do anything though. Britain and Russia won World War 2. America's contribution was a distant fourth to other commonwealth countries like Canada and Australia who didn't shirk their responsibilities from the start. Lets face it Germany, Britain and the Commonwealth could've taken over the world, but we stood up for what was right avoided capitulation, bombed their cities, and bravely lasted 6 years in a war that only Russia's contribution can be compared to.

Well by that seeing as you're a mackem/Wearside, you must hate geordies because of Mary Bell?

Floating teeth in dark nightclub black. MK Dons have more history than America.

Why would you hate Scandinavians?

To be honest there's many English people who know as little about America. What sort of country doesn't have football as it's number one sport? Country of wronguns. It bugs me when on the odd occasion you hear their news snippets, they'll say "here in London - England", yet for America it's "Kentucky - Virginia", fuckin Kentucky - America, no ones heard of Virginia, apart from that old boiler who used to play tennis, you insignificant non-events, whereas London is the most important and number one, city on earth by many definitions.