Douggy B

As I said there are plenty ways of proving we are two different people, but you are faceless mugs who hide behind your pc's. Admin could solve this straight away. How could you have a proxy that is permanently in London? Dont you work in London sometimes Stevie? Yes, I work off my work system at home as well through remote connection, and hypothetically I could post on here showing a London IP address, even though I'm here, but I don't want people knowing who I work for. You know for a fact WL isn't me. I'll be in London the last Friday in May, you should meet WL and me for a pint. Its magical how you log on at the same time. Are you sleeping together? Oh dear. You were born in 1978 or 1979, and THIS is the best you can do? 77 and to be honest Stevie you dont have a leg to stand on: Saying you are going not going to come back on without an apology and coming back on here. Shown up as a liar several times on here. Including in this thread. Pretending to be a Chelsea fan from London. All pretty damning stuff.

Discretional Senior management bonuses have been shelved at mine. Staff band bonuses remain. Alot of bonuses are contractual and part of the staffs remuniration package but dont let the facts get in the way of a good rant. Surely you cant have forgotten the time when attracting and retaining staff was an issue? It wasnt that long ago.

Rumour has it you can do both. Pills never shrunk my todger like whizz. Orrible dirty stuff.

As I said there are plenty ways of proving we are two different people, but you are faceless mugs who hide behind your pc's. Admin could solve this straight away. How could you have a proxy that is permanently in London? Dont you work in London sometimes Stevie? Yes, I work off my work system at home as well through remote connection, and hypothetically I could post on here showing a London IP address, even though I'm here, but I don't want people knowing who I work for. You know for a fact WL isn't me. I'll be in London the last Friday in May, you should meet WL and me for a pint. Its magical how you log on at the same time. Are you sleeping together?

As I said there are plenty ways of proving we are two different people, but you are faceless mugs who hide behind your pc's. Admin could solve this straight away. How could you have a proxy that is permanently in London? Dont you work in London sometimes Stevie?

Pity should be reserved for a Y!d nonentity such as yourself. Such a Stevie thing to say. One thing I can categorically state with a huge amount of conviction is I'm more intelligent than you. Now even you, thick cunt that you are, if you were to post as two people I wouldn't think you'd be dense enough to post in a similar style. You'd alter the style very differently. The admin have told you the two IP's are completely different, and bollocks to your proxy bollocks, I didn't even know what a proxy was till you were on about it the last time WL posted. Your posts in this thread cry of desperation, look at me, look at me, I'm baiting Stevie, it reminds me of this brummie Villa fan in The Lounge in the town excitedly crying to his mate, "we're in a round with the geordies ". Uh-huh http://www.toontastic.net/board/index.php?...ghlite=%2Bproxy HA HA HA

Pity should be reserved for a Y!d nonentity such as yourself. Such a Stevie thing to say.

clueless, just about every expert I have heard has said this pandemic could have even worse effects on the world economy. clueless, in the short-run of course it does, restricted movement of resources across international boundaries will exacerbate short-term economic issues. I was thinking bigger picture than that having just read the Leader for this weeks Economist, a publication i doubt you are able to comprehend. Yeah very highbrow. Give the RIFR a read mate, a little more detailed and a little less sensationalist. Wasn't it the economist that advocated legalising all narcotics a couple of months back So if the world economy is shrinking by 1.3% and the world's population is growing, how do you feed everyone? What has the Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands got to say on the matter? We aren't feeding everyone now and we wont do until restrictions on GM crops are raised. How much faster is the economy going to shrink if a pandemic does hit? Or is it only going to target those who aren't contributing to economic growth? Pathetic argument TBH What is pathetic? The supposition that the world is over-populated or that a pandemic wont affect long-run economic performance. Those were the premises of the statement, so please explain how either of those general views is wrong. I tell you what is pathetic, using statements like 'clueless' when discussing economics with an economist. If i interpret your contrary position correctly, i presume you think increased population growth would be beneficial for the world as that is the antithesis to my statement above? For the record, any loss of human life is a bad thing and from a moral point of view we should trade-off longer term implications for the short-term priority of saving lives. I was just introducing another point of view into the thread. Surely a more productive way would be to slow population growth through less blunt methods than a pandemic. Surely long term education, and a movement towards sustainable energy and GM crops would be more beneficial to the world as a whole? Economist I didnt say it was the most productive way, i just said that it might be beneficial in the long-run to have less population, a position you have just agreed with. Yes, well done there are other development policies too. I wasnt arguing that it was the best way forward. Failed to set the straw-man up, failed to argue a contrary position and failed to shift the debate to controversial topics like GM crops. No you tried to argue that a Pandemic would be beneficial not less population.

clueless, just about every expert I have heard has said this pandemic could have even worse effects on the world economy. clueless, in the short-run of course it does, restricted movement of resources across international boundaries will exacerbate short-term economic issues. I was thinking bigger picture than that having just read the Leader for this weeks Economist, a publication i doubt you are able to comprehend. Yeah very highbrow. Give the RIFR a read mate, a little more detailed and a little less sensationalist. Wasn't it the economist that advocated legalising all narcotics a couple of months back So if the world economy is shrinking by 1.3% and the world's population is growing, how do you feed everyone? What has the Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands got to say on the matter? We aren't feeding everyone now and we wont do until restrictions on GM crops are raised. How much faster is the economy going to shrink if a pandemic does hit? Or is it only going to target those who aren't contributing to economic growth? Pathetic argument TBH What is pathetic? The supposition that the world is over-populated or that a pandemic wont affect long-run economic performance. Those were the premises of the statement, so please explain how either of those general views is wrong. I tell you what is pathetic, using statements like 'clueless' when discussing economics with an economist. If i interpret your contrary position correctly, i presume you think increased population growth would be beneficial for the world as that is the antithesis to my statement above? For the record, any loss of human life is a bad thing and from a moral point of view we should trade-off longer term implications for the short-term priority of saving lives. I was just introducing another point of view into the thread. Surely a more productive way would be to slow population growth through less blunt methods than a pandemic. Surely long term education, and a movement towards sustainable energy and GM crops would be more beneficial to the world as a whole? Economist

Poor Stevie.

clueless, just about every expert I have heard has said this pandemic could have even worse effects on the world economy. clueless, in the short-run of course it does, restricted movement of resources across international boundaries will exacerbate short-term economic issues. I was thinking bigger picture than that having just read the Leader for this weeks Economist, a publication i doubt you are able to comprehend. Yeah very highbrow. Give the RIFR a read mate, a little more detailed and a little less sensationalist. Wasn't it the economist that advocated legalising all narcotics a couple of months back So if the world economy is shrinking by 1.3% and the world's population is growing, how do you feed everyone? What has the Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands got to say on the matter? We aren't feeding everyone now and we wont do until restrictions on GM crops are raised. How much faster is the economy going to shrink if a pandemic does hit? Or is it only going to target those who aren't contributing to economic growth? Pathetic argument TBH

So he kicked out Whiteside and McGrath (who was broken by then) and kept Robson on despite his drinking. Remind me why Fergie would have been so good for him?

clueless, just about every expert I have heard has said this pandemic could have even worse effects on the world economy. clueless, in the short-run of course it does, restricted movement of resources across international boundaries will exacerbate short-term economic issues. I was thinking bigger picture than that having just read the Leader for this weeks Economist, a publication i doubt you are able to comprehend. Yeah very highbrow. Give the RIFR a read mate, a little more detailed and a little less sensationalist. Wasn't it the economist that advocated legalising all narcotics a couple of months back

clueless, just about every expert I have heard has said this pandemic could have even worse effects on the world economy.

How is a bloke getting tazered funny exactly? Surely the tazering isnt the most shocking thing about that vid?

Probably be bored learning at school. I think the parents have the right idea. As long as she is allowed plenty of social time with kids of her own age whats the problem?

Can't believe a potentially funny thread ruined with left wing nonsense.

They're arselickers and two faced though Craig, they'll say anything to get you on side then stab you in the back. Danny B you are a childish faceless non-entity do you believe I would waste my time posting as two people to piss you off? You total mug. Honestly I have to double check every time you post to see which one it is. Its quite amusing TBH.

If doesnt take much to set up a proxy Tom. It is blatently him, they always turn up together. Either that of WL is his work down south.

Face masks on the tube this morning

http://vimeo.com/4273363 A thread that would make would make even Wacky feel better about himself

WHO has just escalated to level five. One more and this is the real thing. Tinned food, aggressive dog and bio-hazard suit at the ready.

What, like bankers, stock brokers and footballers? Good riddance. £150 K is a lot more than most professionals earn and don't forget you only pay the excess on money earned above this level. Danny B showing himself to be a good old Thatcher boy tbh. Like innovators, idea merchants, small company owners and sole traders. Nothing strangles an economic growth like over taxation. Of course Danny, all those people are going to up sticks and go exactly where? Funny how other economies with higher tax rates never seem to be affected by this so-called brain drain. They are. You really know fuck all about anything do you. http://www.toontastic.net/board/index.php?...st&p=608681

Illegal payments which should have seen you relegated but the FA bottled it - about 95? Crooks, Hoddle, Archibald, Sheringham, Keane - cheats to a man. we got a points deduction, Arse got awa y scott free. As for that list? joke

spurs fan Getting Promoted despite being 6th in 1919 Admitted to using performing enhancing drugs in the cup in 1924 Making illegal payments to players 1929 Brawling in 89 and 90 George Graham taking bungs in 95 99 cheating in FA cupl against sheffield united "Invincibles" skank a draw at Portsmouth with Pires dive in the dying moments. Vieira, Ashley Cole, Pires, Henry premiership divers. Eboue dive in champions league final. The list is endless. Didn't you get promoted in an equally dodgy way? No we got relegated in an equally dodgy way.