Park Life 71 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Parky, what do you (and others) make of rumoured Atlantean and ancient Indian, Greek, Chinese and many other technologies, which sound rather more advanced than what we currently possess? See the link I posted for some examples with evidence that could be believed, maybe. The future is the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted July 24, 2008 Author Share Posted July 24, 2008 Parky, what do you (and others) make of rumoured Atlantean and ancient Indian, Greek, Chinese and many other technologies, which sound rather more advanced than what we currently possess? See the link I posted for some examples with evidence that could be believed, maybe. The Nasca lines intrigue me, it seems difficult to imagine how they could have been created without aerial intervention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Parky, what do you (and others) make of rumoured Atlantean and ancient Indian, Greek, Chinese and many other technologies, which sound rather more advanced than what we currently possess? See the link I posted for some examples with evidence that could be believed, maybe. The Nasca lines intrigue me, it seems difficult to imagine how they could have been created without aerial intervention. Fascinating stuff. Going back to what GG was saying of course the Govt. are fully aware of contradictions in tech spikes and occureances in the past and have spent a lot of time and money on researching this stuff, in the beginning cause they were fearful (cabals always fear being overturned) and more recently cause they have seen direct benefits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9305 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Parky, what do you (and others) make of rumoured Atlantean and ancient Indian, Greek, Chinese and many other technologies, which sound rather more advanced than what we currently possess? See the link I posted for some examples with evidence that could be believed, maybe. The Nasca lines intrigue me, it seems difficult to imagine how they could have been created without aerial intervention. Surely they're just scaled up drawings? For example if you drew a spider with legs on pace long, then you could draw in the sand a spider with legs ten paces long? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Parky, what do you (and others) make of rumoured Atlantean and ancient Indian, Greek, Chinese and many other technologies, which sound rather more advanced than what we currently possess? See the link I posted for some examples with evidence that could be believed, maybe. The Nasca lines intrigue me, it seems difficult to imagine how they could have been created without aerial intervention. Surely they're just scaled up drawings? For example if you drew a spider with legs on pace long, then you could draw in the sand a spider with legs ten paces long? Another mystery solved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted July 24, 2008 Author Share Posted July 24, 2008 Parky, what do you (and others) make of rumoured Atlantean and ancient Indian, Greek, Chinese and many other technologies, which sound rather more advanced than what we currently possess? See the link I posted for some examples with evidence that could be believed, aybe. The Nasca lines intrigue me, it seems difficult to imagine how they could have been created without aerial intervention. Surely they're just scaled up drawings? For example if you drew a spider with legs on pace long, then you could draw in the sand a spider with legs ten paces long? I understand what you are saying Dave, but it seems incredible to draw something so accurately at that scale without being able to see it from the air, and at what purpose too ? surely you would be creating such an image for someone viewing from altitude ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9305 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 (edited) Parky, what do you (and others) make of rumoured Atlantean and ancient Indian, Greek, Chinese and many other technologies, which sound rather more advanced than what we currently possess? See the link I posted for some examples with evidence that could be believed, aybe. The Nasca lines intrigue me, it seems difficult to imagine how they could have been created without aerial intervention. Surely they're just scaled up drawings? For example if you drew a spider with legs on pace long, then you could draw in the sand a spider with legs ten paces long? I understand what you are saying Dave, but it seems incredible to draw something so accurately at that scale without being able to see it from the air, and at what purpose too ? surely you would be creating such an image for someone viewing from altitude ? That's a fair point. I could only suggest that it wasn't meant for human eyes, instead it was an offering to Gods. The accuracy is impressive, but then so are the pyramids, they too are a monumental undertaking seemingly beyond the technology of the day. But there they are, all man-made and what not. I agree they're incredible, but I don't think they're advanced ancient technology, nor alien. (by the by, I'm entirely in the "close encounters" camp in that, I do believe Aliens exist, not so sure they'd let us know about it however. ) Edited July 24, 2008 by The Fish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Parky, what do you (and others) make of rumoured Atlantean and ancient Indian, Greek, Chinese and many other technologies, which sound rather more advanced than what we currently possess? See the link I posted for some examples with evidence that could be believed, aybe. The Nasca lines intrigue me, it seems difficult to imagine how they could have been created without aerial intervention. Surely they're just scaled up drawings? For example if you drew a spider with legs on pace long, then you could draw in the sand a spider with legs ten paces long? I understand what you are saying Dave, but it seems incredible to draw something so accurately at that scale without being able to see it from the air, and at what purpose too ? surely you would be creating such an image for someone viewing from altitude ? That's a fair point. I could only suggest that it wasn't meant for human eyes, instead it was an offering to Gods. The accuracy is impressive, but then so are the pyramids, they too are a monumental undertaking seemingly beyond the technology of the day. But there they are, all man-made and what not. I agree they're incredible, but I don't think they're advanced ancient civilisation, nor alien. (by the by, I'm entirely in the "close encounters" camp in that, I do believe Aliens exist, not so sure they'd let us know about it however. ) True, if the ancients could build a pyramid then they definitely could do a giant cartoon spider. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Parky, what do you (and others) make of rumoured Atlantean and ancient Indian, Greek, Chinese and many other technologies, which sound rather more advanced than what we currently possess? See the link I posted for some examples with evidence that could be believed, aybe. The Nasca lines intrigue me, it seems difficult to imagine how they could have been created without aerial intervention. Surely they're just scaled up drawings? For example if you drew a spider with legs on pace long, then you could draw in the sand a spider with legs ten paces long? I understand what you are saying Dave, but it seems incredible to draw something so accurately at that scale without being able to see it from the air, and at what purpose too ? surely you would be creating such an image for someone viewing from altitude ? That's a fair point. I could only suggest that it wasn't meant for human eyes, instead it was an offering to Gods. The accuracy is impressive, but then so are the pyramids, they too are a monumental undertaking seemingly beyond the technology of the day. But there they are, all man-made and what not. I agree they're incredible, but I don't think they're advanced ancient technology, nor alien. (by the by, I'm entirely in the "close encounters" camp in that, I do believe Aliens exist, not so sure they'd let us know about it however. ) Aye it's just maths. Truthfully getting a calendar to work right was probably more challenging for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted July 24, 2008 Author Share Posted July 24, 2008 Parky, what do you (and others) make of rumoured Atlantean and ancient Indian, Greek, Chinese and many other technologies, which sound rather more advanced than what we currently possess? See the link I posted for some examples with evidence that could be believed, aybe. The Nasca lines intrigue me, it seems difficult to imagine how they could have been created without aerial intervention. Surely they're just scaled up drawings? For example if you drew a spider with legs on pace long, then you could draw in the sand a spider with legs ten paces long? I understand what you are saying Dave, but it seems incredible to draw something so accurately at that scale without being able to see it from the air, and at what purpose too ? surely you would be creating such an image for someone viewing from altitude ? That's a fair point. I could only suggest that it wasn't meant for human eyes, instead it was an offering to Gods. The accuracy is impressive, but then so are the pyramids, they too are a monumental undertaking seemingly beyond the technology of the day. But there they are, all man-made and what not. I agree they're incredible, but I don't think they're advanced ancient civilisation, nor alien. (by the by, I'm entirely in the "close encounters" camp in that, I do believe Aliens exist, not so sure they'd let us know about it however. ) True, if the ancients could build a pyramid then they definitely could do a giant cartoon spider. I don't disagree, both creations are fascinating, in my opinion, and I'm sure modern man has yet to learn the significance of either, although to describe the images at Nasca as "cartoon" is a little bit insulting to such an ancient culture, its a bit like describing the Pyramids as a conservatory, as well as the Spider and Monkey images at Nasca, there are also "runway" like images too which aren't as obviously explainable in their purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Parky, what do you (and others) make of rumoured Atlantean and ancient Indian, Greek, Chinese and many other technologies, which sound rather more advanced than what we currently possess? See the link I posted for some examples with evidence that could be believed, aybe. The Nasca lines intrigue me, it seems difficult to imagine how they could have been created without aerial intervention. Surely they're just scaled up drawings? For example if you drew a spider with legs on pace long, then you could draw in the sand a spider with legs ten paces long? I understand what you are saying Dave, but it seems incredible to draw something so accurately at that scale without being able to see it from the air, and at what purpose too ? surely you would be creating such an image for someone viewing from altitude ? That's a fair point. I could only suggest that it wasn't meant for human eyes, instead it was an offering to Gods. The accuracy is impressive, but then so are the pyramids, they too are a monumental undertaking seemingly beyond the technology of the day. But there they are, all man-made and what not. I agree they're incredible, but I don't think they're advanced ancient civilisation, nor alien. (by the by, I'm entirely in the "close encounters" camp in that, I do believe Aliens exist, not so sure they'd let us know about it however. ) True, if the ancients could build a pyramid then they definitely could do a giant cartoon spider. I don't disagree, both creations are fascinating, in my opinion, and I'm sure modern man has yet to learn the significance of either, although to describe the images at Nasca as "cartoon" is a little bit insulting to such an ancient culture, its a bit like describing the Pyramids as a conservatory, as well as the Spider and Monkey images at Nasca, there are also "runway" like images too which aren't as obviously explainable in their purpose. It was a joke, am utterly fascinated by the pyramids too and have read all Hancock's books on them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus 0 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 i used to read a lot of these type of books about alternative or forgotton history and what not. but it seemed that the more popular the genre got - the more sensationalist some of the claims became. but its facinating to know that ancient cultures had calenders more accurate than our own (until recently anyway) and that creations myths all over the world share similar themes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 It's all thanks to The Predators Laz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 i used to read a lot of these type of books about alternative or forgotton history and what not. but it seemed that the more popular the genre got - the more sensationalist some of the claims became. but its facinating to know that ancient cultures had calenders more accurate than our own (until recently anyway) and that creations myths all over the world share similar themes. In fairness a huge fuckoff flood that covered 1/4 of the worlds then landmass was probably fairly hard to miss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Downloading this as we speak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howay 12496 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Definitely interesting stuff wonder what will come out in 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9305 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Definitely interesting stuff wonder what will come out in 2010. Hoodwinked 2: Hood vs Evil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grasshopper 0 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Definitely interesting stuff wonder what will come out in 2010. Hoodwinked 2: Hood vs Evil gordon brown, tony blair, and that annoying skinny twat off big brother Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9305 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Also, Thor is is out in 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 12910 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Who gives a shit about alien technology when Toy Story 3 comes out in 2010? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6328 Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 You mean to suggest that not only have our secret intelligent services (the ones remember who are not adverse to leaving laptops on trains and 'losing' CDs containing confidential data) been able to keep this under wraps but that the ETs themselves have ensured that they've only integrated with such people? Do me a favour... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 You mean to suggest that not only have our secret intelligent services (the ones remember who are not adverse to leaving laptops on trains and 'losing' CDs containing confidential data) been able to keep this under wraps but that the ETs themselves have ensured that they've only integrated with such people? Do me a favour... What are you saying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 You mean to suggest that not only have our secret intelligent services (the ones remember who are not adverse to leaving laptops on trains and 'losing' CDs containing confidential data) been able to keep this under wraps but that the ETs themselves have ensured that they've only integrated with such people? Do me a favour... What are you saying? That general incompetence is the nadir of most conspiracies, I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6328 Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 It's a load of bollocks... as is the ridiculous conspiracy theories about Ayrton Senna / Princess Diana / 9-11 but I know you disagree with me on some / all of those too... The only one I think there is any credibile suggestion of a possible conspiracy is the JFK assassination but even that one I'm not convinced about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 It's a load of bollocks... as is the ridiculous conspiracy theories about Ayrton Senna / Princess Diana / 9-11 but I know you disagree with me on some / all of those too... The only one I think there is any credibile suggestion of a possible conspiracy is the JFK assassination but even that one I'm not convinced about. What was the Senna one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now