Jump to content

Other games


Park Life
 Share

Recommended Posts

shackbleep
why wasnt it a red?

 

Because it wasn't two-footed, it was one-footed with the trailing leg catching him and it wasn't high either.

 

If that was a sending off offence they might as well make football a non-contact sport right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • ewerk

    494

  • Tom

    1759

  • Andrew

    812

  • Monroe Transfer

    686

Top Posters In This Topic

Meenzer
If I've interpreted it correctly, Meenzer's point was that the sprint made it look worse to the referee than it actually was - that I can agree with.

Yeah, that's basically what I was saying, although it's impossible to ever know what "intent" there was behind any challenge really. But you've got to be aware that refs will see things a certain way. Not the easiest thing to control in the heat of the moment and when you're trying to impress on your debut (for all I hate to borrow a MOTD argument), but still, he's old enough to know a bit better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

shackbleep

Indeed he is old enough to know better but I'll be amazed if Liverpool don't appeal and not at all surprised that, if they do, it gets rescinded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His left leg goes round the front, his trailing leg is bent back and goes behind the standing leg of the defender and he is on the deck. So what happens is that he connects with his groin. So basically groining someone in the foot is now a sending-off offence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

shackbleep
His left leg goes round the front, his trailing leg is bent back and goes behind the standing leg of the defender and he is on the deck. So what happens is that he connects with his groin. So basically groining someone in the foot is now a sending-off offence.

 

Seems that way :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meenzer
Indeed he is old enough to know better but I'll be amazed if Liverpool don't appeal and not at all surprised that, if they do, it gets rescinded.

 

I'd be amazed if they didn't appeal, but I'd be even more amazed if it got rescinded. C'est la vie, la.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

shackbleep
Guys, guys, let's not argue. Let us be bonded by all rejoicing at what an utter spastic Pepe Reina is. :angry:

 

:angry:

 

I take it he's never heard of wearing a cap when it's sunny?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sammynb
Arsenal now have 1 fit center back

 

:angry:

 

koscielny is back out so theyve got 2, hes been lucky really

 

"lads in the studio" talking absolute bollocks about coles nature and "to the letter of the law its a sending off"

 

its not because its the letter of the law that coles been sent off, its because it was a fucking shoddy, dangerous tackle

 

Wasnt that bad.

 

The look on the liverpool supporting woman behind it said it all for me. It hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wykikitoon

A couple of lads in the office who support the Gooners went yesterday. Said the Scousers at the end were chucking coins and bottles of piss at them :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Fish
Arsenal now have 1 fit center back

 

:angry:

 

koscielny is back out so theyve got 2, hes been lucky really

 

"lads in the studio" talking absolute bollocks about coles nature and "to the letter of the law its a sending off"

 

its not because its the letter of the law that coles been sent off, its because it was a fucking shoddy, dangerous tackle

 

Wasnt that bad.

 

The look on the liverpool supporting woman behind it said it all for me. It hurt.

Yeah, it's not like a scouser to over-egg the pudding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arsenal now have 1 fit center back

 

:angry:

 

koscielny is back out so theyve got 2, hes been lucky really

 

"lads in the studio" talking absolute bollocks about coles nature and "to the letter of the law its a sending off"

 

its not because its the letter of the law that coles been sent off, its because it was a fucking shoddy, dangerous tackle

 

Wasnt that bad.

 

The look on the liverpool supporting woman behind it said it all for me. It hurt.

Yeah, it's not like a scouser to over-egg the pudding

Probably from Norway tbf :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

shackbleep
Indeed he is old enough to know better but I'll be amazed if Liverpool don't appeal and not at all surprised that, if they do, it gets rescinded.

 

I'd be amazed if they didn't appeal, but I'd be even more amazed if it got rescinded. C'est la vie, la.

 

Prepare to be amazed - they've declined to appeal. He has a 3 match ban.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

acrossthepond

Let's hope for a few more. I know Danny is probably lurking and wanking himself silly as our anti-Spurs bias is finally proven, but I don't care. I fucking hate Spurs and I hope they crash and burn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn't make it up. 3-0

 

;)

 

'Harry can't wait to get stuck into young boys.'

Edited by Flair
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.