Jump to content

Wikileaks


Happy Face
 Share

Recommended Posts

What are the differences between Mark Zuckerberg and Julian Assange? Let's take a look. Assange gives you private information about corporations for free. And is a villain. Zuckerberg gives your private information to corporations for money and he's Man of the Year.

 

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20026127-71.html

 

:jesuswept:

 

Funded by the CIA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are the differences between Mark Zuckerberg and Julian Assange? Let's take a look. Assange gives you private information about corporations for free. And is a villain. Zuckerberg gives your private information to corporations for money and he's Man of the Year.

 

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20026127-71.html

 

:jesuswept:

 

50% off comfort blankets on Amazon mate, get in there quick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are the differences between Mark Zuckerberg and Julian Assange? Let's take a look. Assange gives you private information about corporations for free. And is a villain. Zuckerberg gives your private information to corporations for money and he's Man of the Year.

 

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20026127-71.html

 

:jesuswept:

 

50% off comfort blankets on Amazon mate, get in there quick

 

Source?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guys a twat, just another nerd wanting attention and those emails are pathetic.

 

I'm thinking the next makeover will be longer white hair and a staff.

 

 

though that was your outfit o Elf Meister

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually one of the more intriguing leaks was that list of "critical manufacturing plants"

 

It included a place in Scotland that does drive systems for N-subs

 

A while back there was story that in the 80's the Brits had developed a new (v v quiet) drive system for N-subs and had handed it over to the Yanks who had used it ever since (like all the things that make an aircraft carrier work - we can think of them but can't afford to build them in quantity)

 

Sounds like maybe we didn't hand over the plans but actually build them for the Yanks in Scotland

 

A very special relationship.............................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually one of the more intriguing leaks was that list of "critical manufacturing plants"

 

It included a place in Scotland that does drive systems for N-subs

 

A while back there was story that in the 80's the Brits had developed a new (v v quiet) drive system for N-subs and had handed it over to the Yanks who had used it ever since (like all the things that make an aircraft carrier work - we can think of them but can't afford to build them in quantity)

 

Sounds like maybe we didn't hand over the plans but actually build them for the Yanks in Scotland

 

A very special relationship.............................

 

The silent drive is made here in Hamburg at the Hafen as it goes. Only we the yanks and the Israeli's are allowed to have it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually one of the more intriguing leaks was that list of "critical manufacturing plants"

 

It included a place in Scotland that does drive systems for N-subs

 

A while back there was story that in the 80's the Brits had developed a new (v v quiet) drive system for N-subs and had handed it over to the Yanks who had used it ever since (like all the things that make an aircraft carrier work - we can think of them but can't afford to build them in quantity)

 

Sounds like maybe we didn't hand over the plans but actually build them for the Yanks in Scotland

 

A very special relationship.............................

 

The silent drive is made here in Hamburg at the Hafen as it goes. Only we the yanks and the Israeli's are allowed to have it.

 

 

really?? One left over from 1945?? then what are they making in Scotland?

 

It was a USN source that said it was the Brits what developed it.................. and Jormany & the Israelis don't have N subs - just small (but quiet) conventional stuff

Edited by Rob W
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wikileaks. Tenna For Men.

 

It's all pretty despicable to me. Private messages should remain private imo. Fair enough if there is something 'out there' worth knowing, but this shit about Prince Andrew being a bore - oooh, the hurt! Brit diplomats/politicians being obsessed with the 'special relationship' - ooooh, stop it please.

 

Imagine if all private messages etc were made public; what a shit place this world would be. There's nothing like bitching about each other behind backs - we all do it!

 

Time for a dance :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wikileaks. Tenna For Men.

 

It's all pretty despicable to me. Private messages should remain private imo. Fair enough if there is something 'out there' worth knowing, but this shit about Prince Andrew being a bore - oooh, the hurt! Brit diplomats/politicians being obsessed with the 'special relationship' - ooooh, stop it please.

 

Imagine if all private messages etc were made public; what a shit place this world would be. There's nothing like bitching about each other behind backs - we all do it!

 

Time for a dance :rolleyes:

 

nah, you're wrong. We all "have a right to know" these things :D

 

How long is this going to drag on anyway ? The sooner some fucker shoots him, the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cable leaks are pretty poor; not top secret info, and mostly uninteresting - so far (North Korea asking the US for an Eric Clapton concert was funny). There have been plenty of good leaks, I'd like to see more on Karzai's government and Afghanistan.

In a way Wikileaks has failed, especially when it comes to releasing information from the most closed and corrupt societies, at least the powerful and organized ones (they gathered some leaks on Africa but whilst those governments were very corrupt they are also very disorganized so it is easier for leaks to get out). They aren't receiving high quality leaks from these places, so much for the old 'courage is contagious' schtick. The type of people who worship Assange as some kind of deity tend to believe that the UK/US are the most closed and corrupt societies in the world, or at least act like it; this kind of attitude is just plain annoying and stupid, it will only garner criticism.

Edited by Kevin S. Assilleekunt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ann Ardin one of his accusers has apparently left Sweden (refuses to helf authorities) and moved to Palestine. This just gest wierder and wierder. Mmmm, might need to give it some special attention.

 

Edit, P

 

A cursory glance at this reveals she is some kind of right wing Christian hence her interest in Israel/ Palestine thing,

 

i

Other things of note perhaps is to take a closer look at Mr A's parents.

 

 

Anna Ardin the sultry Cia stooge.

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRP85CvpZK9cweYrOEoIFu6-APQFVmfEB20WJ_Oj6zhLz4cXkRO59ZlaIdu

 

 

 

Hope this ain't let's make the interweb look really dangerous and out of control so we can close it the fuck down kind of thing.

Edited by Park Life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the United States, Julian Assange may now be Public Enemy Number One. Some American politicians have even called for his execution.

 

But less than a year ago, the founder of WikiLeaks was officially entertained at a US Embassy cocktail party by one of the very diplomats whose secrets he would soon spill to the world.

 

At the reception, held at the US ambassador's residence in Reykjavik, Iceland, Mr Assange chatted with Sam Watson, the embassy's deputy chief of mission.

 

He was already sitting on dozens of Mr Watson's classified cables at the time of the December party, including embarrassing details about America's and Britain's role following the collapse of Iceland's banks which were later published to widespread outrage in the local media.

 

"He certainly had fun at the party," said Birgitta Jonsdottir, an Icelandic MP and former activist in WikiLeaks. "He went as my guest. I said it would be a bit of a prank to take him and see if they knew who he was. I don't think they had any idea."

 

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/...fce467b17fe%2C0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sounds like the set-up for a joke, but it really isn't- what's the difference between a newspaper doing investigative journalism and Wikileaks? Seriously? What's the difference between Julian Assange and Woodward and Bernstein? Does he pay for information or something? I honestly don't see the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

"Addendum:

 

The CIA would be the most likely $5M funder. Soros is suspected

of being a conduit for black money to dissident groups racketeering

for such payola.

 

Now it may be that that is the intention of WL because its behavior

so far fits the pattern.

 

If fleecing the CIA is the purpose, I urge setting a much higher

funding goal, in the $100M range and up. The US intel agencies

are awash in funds they cannot spend fast enough to keep the

Congressional spigot wide open. Academics, dissidents, companies,

spy contractors, other nation's spy agencies, whole countries, are

falling over themselves to tap into this bountiful flood. But competition

is fierce, and accusations of deception are raging even as the

fleecers work in concert.

 

Chinese dissidents -- a brand name among many -- are already

reaping huge benefits from covert funding from the US and from

the PRC, along with others in the former Soviets, in Africa and

South America, inside the US, UK and Europe, in the Middle East

and the Koreas, who know how to double-cross ditzy-rich Dads

and Moms.

 

In solidarity to fuck em all."

 

 

It's basically where I was at with this about a week ago when I started saying I was bored with him and was waiting for the assasination attempt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.