Jimbo

I'd try a cd cleaner disc or failing that, take the lid off and blow the dust out, often works wonders.

14622 posts and you didn't know that there is one already? No because I don't use them. I imagine it was the first thing you checked for after registering. Is he the cunt that keeps grassing people on NO, no one likes a grass Why do I get the image of Phil Mitchell typing frantically?

but Muhammad Ali would be a different matter.

Surely this should be his bag ?

These are my shifts for January, D = 6am-6pm N=6pm-6am nn = standby shift, black block is holiday.

I work nights often and used to work permanent nights, you need to make sure you have a good lay in or a snooze in the afternoon, if not you'll struggle, take some Pro-plus or Redbull.

whats the budget ?

RIP The former presenter of BBC TV's Mastermind programme, Magnus Magnusson, has died at the age of 77. Mr Magnusson, who was born in Iceland in 1929, had been diagnosed with cancer last year. He came to Scotland at the age of one and spent his life working as a journalist, writer and broadcaster. Mr Magnusson, who had a wife and four children, was known for his catchphrase "I've started so I'll finish" from the long-running TV quiz programme.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2535310,00.html Revealed: Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran ISRAEL has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons. Two Israeli air force squadrons are training to blow up an Iranian facility using low-yield nuclear “bunker-busters”, according to several Israeli military sources. The attack would be the first with nuclear weapons since 1945, when the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Israeli weapons would each have a force equivalent to one-fifteenth of the Hiroshima bomb. Under the plans, conventional laser-guided bombs would open “tunnels” into the targets. “Mini-nukes” would then immediately be fired into a plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce the risk of radioactive fallout. “As soon as the green light is given, it will be one mission, one strike and the Iranian nuclear project will be demolished,” said one of the sources. The plans, disclosed to The Sunday Times last week, have been prompted in part by the Israeli intelligence service Mossad’s assessment that Iran is on the verge of producing enough enriched uranium to make nuclear weapons within two years. Israeli military commanders believe conventional strikes may no longer be enough to annihilate increasingly well-defended enrichment facilities. Several have been built beneath at least 70ft of concrete and rock. However, the nuclear-tipped bunker-busters would be used only if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United States declined to intervene, senior sources said. Israeli and American officials have met several times to consider military action. Military analysts said the disclosure of the plans could be intended to put pressure on Tehran to halt enrichment, cajole America into action or soften up world opinion in advance of an Israeli attack. Some analysts warned that Iranian retaliation for such a strike could range from disruption of oil supplies to the West to terrorist attacks against Jewish targets around the world. Israel has identified three prime targets south of Tehran which are believed to be involved in Iran’s nuclear programme: # Natanz, where thousands of centrifuges are being installed for uranium enrichment # A uranium conversion facility near Isfahan where, according to a statement by an Iranian vice-president last week, 250 tons of gas for the enrichment process have been stored in tunnels # A heavy water reactor at Arak, which may in future produce enough plutonium for a bomb Israeli officials believe that destroying all three sites would delay Iran’s nuclear programme indefinitely and prevent them from having to live in fear of a “second Holocaust”. The Israeli government has warned repeatedly that it will never allow nuclear weapons to be made in Iran, whose president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has declared that “Israel must be wiped off the map”.

photoshopped tbh

I did have a film on my mobile of a couple of Japanese girls doing that, not my cup of tea.

You're just a prude Brock.

well, whatever blows your hair back !

Now THIS is porn

The fact that documents such as the bible didn't contain descriptions of events that would later be discovered such as dinosaurs etc, just further prove that it is the word of man rather than the word of god.

can you settle a query? is it worth doing the "Rent-to-buy" thing? What is the "Rent-to-buy" thing? * A property is identified which meets your requirements . * The mortgage lender sells you an ‘option’ to buy that property at an agreed price. * You rent the property from them until you are ready to buy. * When the property is worth more than the agreed price, you exercise your option to buy. * This means you can secure your mortgage without having to put down a deposit

Just trimmed the length of post a bit there! Could depend on what act on their beliefs means. For me they can do anything they like (within the law!) that doesn't impact upon those who don't share their views and i'd apply that to most things tbh. There aren't many examples i can think where i'd have a problem with a person of any religion praticing their beliefs tbh, my problem is with people forcing those views on others and influencing things that affect us all (believers and non). With me it has always been when anyhting gets censored, changed, or worst of all cancelled/banned on the basis of a religious argument. There is no other unproven thing (for want of a better word!) that could ever be used to ban tv programmes from broadcast, have films censored or plays picketted and cancelled etc. and thats the thing that annoys me. If i lived in the USA i'd explode But basically i'm the same as Renton and NJS, i think people are entitled to any faith they like but it shouldn't be taught in schools as a subject or have any hint of it being fact applied to it should it be mentioned, that is for kids to decide themselves. Should evolution be taught in school? Naturally! Its backed up by countless scientific evidence, its happening all the time and can be shown to be and its an important part of the biological sciences. If you want you can end that section of biology in school by saying, by the way the bible has another theory on how things came to be, check it out if you like! Do I have to spend time explaining the whole theory of evolution before we continue with this debate? You realise that many parts of the Bible are backed by historical documents? Jesus was around at the time the Bible claimed, and he was also crucified. These are documents which have nothing to do with religion by the way. In the same sense, evolution (the THEORY) has many facts too, and many things which are peoples opinion. Not really, i did it at school. None of the above stuff you mentioned (being from the new testament) has any baring on what i'd previously said. I said the bible has a theory on how humans came to be, and the part of the bible dealing with how humans came to be is genesis and you will do well to find any historical documents backing up that load of nonsense. There is no document in the world which proves where Man came from. Evolution doesn't even come close to explaining where Man even came from Yes, it does. With modern DNA analysis techniques you can prove it beyond reasonable doubt. The details might not be filled in but that's about it. Do you have a problem accepting humans have no special place in the world (in a biological sense), and are in fact just animals? Plenty of christians do, that's why they hate evolution so much I suspect. That makes a lot more sense than suggesting woman was produced from Adam's rib.

At the same time as posting leaders, Gemmil and Alex are absent, coincidence? I think you've hit the nail on the head.

Just trimmed the length of post a bit there! Could depend on what act on their beliefs means. For me they can do anything they like (within the law!) that doesn't impact upon those who don't share their views and i'd apply that to most things tbh. There aren't many examples i can think where i'd have a problem with a person of any religion praticing their beliefs tbh, my problem is with people forcing those views on others and influencing things that affect us all (believers and non). With me it has always been when anyhting gets censored, changed, or worst of all cancelled/banned on the basis of a religious argument. There is no other unproven thing (for want of a better word!) that could ever be used to ban tv programmes from broadcast, have films censored or plays picketted and cancelled etc. and thats the thing that annoys me. If i lived in the USA i'd explode But basically i'm the same as Renton and NJS, i think people are entitled to any faith they like but it shouldn't be taught in schools as a subject or have any hint of it being fact applied to it should it be mentioned, that is for kids to decide themselves. Should evolution be taught in school? Of course, there is clear scientific evidence of it.

I'm not bothered what people believe as long as it doesn't have a harmful effect on others, it just amuses me when people claim that contradictory and historically unreliable documents such as the bible as being unrefutable evidence. If people wish to have their beliefs and admit its all down to pure faith rather than having "evidence" then that is fine in my opinion.