JaMoUsE

west brom winning

can any1 tell me what the prize money is for coming 1st/2nd in the championship?

back row of east stand right on the halfway line cracking seat. allows me to stand up all game as i hate sitting down. Atmospheres non existant like

not bad considering ive got a hacked modem and pay nothing every month ;-)

the hurt locker. brilliant

aye but who foots the tax bill they didnt pay? the tax payer?

theyve entered administration and storie to leave things are looking up for them already! http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/newshome/Storr...mpey.6108304.jp

aye be quick tho, he has his lunch at 11.30 and wakes from his post lunch nap at 13:00

managed to get a haxorware updated virgin media box and worked a treat $$$

End of this month I think. Loan finishes after Watford, Hughton considering extending it but hasnt asked Chelsea yet. nee chance of it being extended, ashley cole out long term and his replacement Zhirkov got injured on saturday

any1 notice the sham that was the boro away tickets for sale? apparently the club scrapped the points scheme and theres hell on now. Fortunately i managed to get 4 tickets from my 2 season tickets (2 on each) now is this the norm? i was confused as each of my ST's has over 100 loyalty points however i thort it was the norm for only 1 ticket per ST but obviously took advantage as the website let me put more than 1 on. Can any1 clear this up?

bets for tomorrow/sunday £5 on Newcastle to win by 1 goal West Brom Gateshead West Ham Man City wins £350 £5 on Leeds HT/FT Man Utd Cardiff Fleetwood Town wins £55

you got match tickets too?

aye i was already paying the broadband. its 15 reconnection fee im canny annoyed about it. but i think hell get it reconnected . last time i let sum1 take sumthing in their name

aye them wireless dongels are no good for gaming tho. aye virgin being wankers!

basically ive had virgin media tv phone and internet. the person i live withs being a nob and has dissconnected the internet, ive rang and tried tget it in my name but theyre saying u can only hav 1 account per household and its in my housemates name so i cant go thru virgin. 2ndly we dont have a bt landline its virgin. what alternatives do i have (whitley bay area) as it stands with regards to getting a decent broadband coonection with minimal hassle

this

Aye reet can you just show me where i asked aswell tho ?

Come back when've caught up with everything son... I've read this forum for a long time, son, but a typical condescending reply from yourself from up there on the horse. Stevie is one of only a small selection of local posters on here and is pretty well liked, he goes close to the line sometimes but if you come down on stuff like that too hard you just end up with Newcastle Online, which is frankly unbearable. If you've read it for a long time then I put you in the 'need you head examined' category that I referred to earlier. Stevie well liked? Well I've had a multitude of PMs that counter that claim. I don't doubt that some like him but definitely not all. Anyway regardless of whether he's liked or not, he's continually transgressed (NOT as you put it 'goes close to the line sometimes') and despite being asked to cut out certain aspects of his posting, he's continued effectively sticking 2 fingers up to those who manage the place and attempt to keep order. That's not just me btw. As one member said earlier to me, if people want to run their own forum with the own rules then they can do so otherwise STFU and that they've often thought to themselves 'What must some people think' who are just browsing as guests etc. A bit embarrassing really from that standpoint. Especially if you realise people from other clubs, the media etc. will be reading messageboards from time to time. As for ending up like N-O, this is only the second person who has been removed from TT in almost 5 years. It's hardly like we've got a 'forum of the banned'. Anyway - he's gone. Get over it. You obviously didn't take my criticism of being condescending seriously by opening your post with that. What a prick honestly. I've seen how all the other admins/mods go about their business and I've seen you and there's a massive difference. Telling people to STFU who disagree with the banning is out of line as well. You know he's done fuck all wrong when you have to refer to past discrepancies to justify the ban to people mate. Why don't you read my post correctly and then come back and have another go? I was paraphrasing.... It was the comment of someone else but that's not to say I don't agree with it. Massive difference? How so? Because I come out and publically defend the decision of the team? ... and come across as a right snotty P.C cock in doing such. Why don't you move this magical Stevie thread over from the admin forum and let us all read it? I fully expect you won't because it'll pretty much expose how 100% in favour of it you were, and how the other admins probably reluctantly agreed in the end. I fully expect we wont either because it's a mods thread, to be viewed by mods & admin's only. As for it all being Craig and we all reluctantly gave gave in to his demands? bollocks. Stevie had been on borrowed time for a while really. Several members of the mod & admin teams have requested that he be banned, for various things and to the frustration of many - he wasn't. I'll hold my hands up and admit to being one of those who probably added to that frustration by explaining away his transgression. Usually as I'd ask myself 'Would we ban someone else for this too, or does this just feel worse because it's Stevie(again)'. For the record, I was no fan Stevie either, but I'm the sort of person who tries to view all sides and in my capacity as Admin I look at any issue in isolation rather than give much weight to 'previous'. Thing is though, there's only so many times you can do that before you think to yourself, 'hang on, why are we having this conversation AGAIN. There's a pattern here.' Stevie was a repeat offender for the same offences. There are very few rules on here and as has been explained on here before (ironically, the last time we banned Stevie) we're pretty relaxed; which for me is one of the reasons I like this place. If this were NO, Stevie would not have lasted as long as he did as they would not have been so tolerant. Saying that is a moot point really, as IIRC Stevie was banned from NO. On that point, we have a number of members on here who have been banned from NO for lesser crimes than Stevie was banned from here for; and they post on here without incident. For the record - people don't get banned on here 'cos we dont like them. There are a few members on here I'm no fan of and I'm sure some of you feel the same about me; but you know what? that's fine (although when I track you down I will ban you!!! mwahahahaha ) [/ end subconscious thoughts]. As Craig has pointed out already, this is only the 2nd poster we have ever banned, so it's not like we do it often and given the amount of discussion prior to it, it certainly was no quick thing. This place pretty much runs itself because most people can keep to those few rules and that's great because I have better things to do than have discussions about who to ban etc. In the end, with Stevie I personally started to feel that he was always pushing to see how far he'd get before one of us would bite. I have a 2yr old son who does that. He know's he doing something wrong, but just as he's about to do it; he stops & takes a quick look around to see if anyone will tell him off The difference is, Stevie is a grown man not a toddler. In all the time I've been an admin, I've never had to talk about any other member as much as I've talked about Stevie. In fact, other than Stevie & DannyB I don't think I've had to offer an opinion on any other member. What does that tell you? For his faults, Stevie did contribute to this forum and that was one of the reasons he lasted as long as he did. But unfortunately some of the good stuff he contributed seemed to lose it's value by the manner in which he gave it imo. Lastly, for the record (it's a 12" this one isn't it?) it wasn't Craig who banned him. Stevie's gone, move on. okay fair do's, this is the last thing ill say on the matter. Surely the fairest and most proper way to deal with this would be to have a public vote on the forum this way you could gage the posters opinions on members where as you admins took it upon yourself to speak for everyone on the matter. This is a public forum after all and the idea of a mod is to moderate the forum to ensure the users are happy using the forum. But it would appear the mods didnt ask the users. Either way thats my thoughts on it. I just thinks its a shame really as the forum will be canny boring without his 2am rants If you'll miss him that much PM Smogger. I'm sure he has an email address or mobile number. Levels of maturity on here are staggering . Well done Happy Face 1 point for you.

Come back when've caught up with everything son... I've read this forum for a long time, son, but a typical condescending reply from yourself from up there on the horse. Stevie is one of only a small selection of local posters on here and is pretty well liked, he goes close to the line sometimes but if you come down on stuff like that too hard you just end up with Newcastle Online, which is frankly unbearable. If you've read it for a long time then I put you in the 'need you head examined' category that I referred to earlier. Stevie well liked? Well I've had a multitude of PMs that counter that claim. I don't doubt that some like him but definitely not all. Anyway regardless of whether he's liked or not, he's continually transgressed (NOT as you put it 'goes close to the line sometimes') and despite being asked to cut out certain aspects of his posting, he's continued effectively sticking 2 fingers up to those who manage the place and attempt to keep order. That's not just me btw. As one member said earlier to me, if people want to run their own forum with the own rules then they can do so otherwise STFU and that they've often thought to themselves 'What must some people think' who are just browsing as guests etc. A bit embarrassing really from that standpoint. Especially if you realise people from other clubs, the media etc. will be reading messageboards from time to time. As for ending up like N-O, this is only the second person who has been removed from TT in almost 5 years. It's hardly like we've got a 'forum of the banned'. Anyway - he's gone. Get over it. You obviously didn't take my criticism of being condescending seriously by opening your post with that. What a prick honestly. I've seen how all the other admins/mods go about their business and I've seen you and there's a massive difference. Telling people to STFU who disagree with the banning is out of line as well. You know he's done fuck all wrong when you have to refer to past discrepancies to justify the ban to people mate. Why don't you read my post correctly and then come back and have another go? I was paraphrasing.... It was the comment of someone else but that's not to say I don't agree with it. Massive difference? How so? Because I come out and publically defend the decision of the team? ... and come across as a right snotty P.C cock in doing such. Why don't you move this magical Stevie thread over from the admin forum and let us all read it? I fully expect you won't because it'll pretty much expose how 100% in favour of it you were, and how the other admins probably reluctantly agreed in the end. I fully expect we wont either because it's a mods thread, to be viewed by mods & admin's only. As for it all being Craig and we all reluctantly gave gave in to his demands? bollocks. Stevie had been on borrowed time for a while really. Several members of the mod & admin teams have requested that he be banned, for various things and to the frustration of many - he wasn't. I'll hold my hands up and admit to being one of those who probably added to that frustration by explaining away his transgression. Usually as I'd ask myself 'Would we ban someone else for this too, or does this just feel worse because it's Stevie(again)'. For the record, I was no fan Stevie either, but I'm the sort of person who tries to view all sides and in my capacity as Admin I look at any issue in isolation rather than give much weight to 'previous'. Thing is though, there's only so many times you can do that before you think to yourself, 'hang on, why are we having this conversation AGAIN. There's a pattern here.' Stevie was a repeat offender for the same offences. There are very few rules on here and as has been explained on here before (ironically, the last time we banned Stevie) we're pretty relaxed; which for me is one of the reasons I like this place. If this were NO, Stevie would not have lasted as long as he did as they would not have been so tolerant. Saying that is a moot point really, as IIRC Stevie was banned from NO. On that point, we have a number of members on here who have been banned from NO for lesser crimes than Stevie was banned from here for; and they post on here without incident. For the record - people don't get banned on here 'cos we dont like them. There are a few members on here I'm no fan of and I'm sure some of you feel the same about me; but you know what? that's fine (although when I track you down I will ban you!!! mwahahahaha ) [/ end subconscious thoughts]. As Craig has pointed out already, this is only the 2nd poster we have ever banned, so it's not like we do it often and given the amount of discussion prior to it, it certainly was no quick thing. This place pretty much runs itself because most people can keep to those few rules and that's great because I have better things to do than have discussions about who to ban etc. In the end, with Stevie I personally started to feel that he was always pushing to see how far he'd get before one of us would bite. I have a 2yr old son who does that. He know's he doing something wrong, but just as he's about to do it; he stops & takes a quick look around to see if anyone will tell him off The difference is, Stevie is a grown man not a toddler. In all the time I've been an admin, I've never had to talk about any other member as much as I've talked about Stevie. In fact, other than Stevie & DannyB I don't think I've had to offer an opinion on any other member. What does that tell you? For his faults, Stevie did contribute to this forum and that was one of the reasons he lasted as long as he did. But unfortunately some of the good stuff he contributed seemed to lose it's value by the manner in which he gave it imo. Lastly, for the record (it's a 12" this one isn't it?) it wasn't Craig who banned him. Stevie's gone, move on. okay fair do's, this is the last thing ill say on the matter. Surely the fairest and most proper way to deal with this would be to have a public vote on the forum this way you could gage the posters opinions on members where as you admins took it upon yourself to speak for everyone on the matter. This is a public forum after all and the idea of a mod is to moderate the forum to ensure the users are happy using the forum. But it would appear the mods didnt ask the users. Either way thats my thoughts on it. I just thinks its a shame really as the forum will be canny boring without his 2am rants

jesus, like busses all at once

funny that andrew cos ive heard you whinge about ashley numerous times. Ill have to point this out to you next time

Come back when've caught up with everything son... I've read this forum for a long time, son, but a typical condescending reply from yourself from up there on the horse. Stevie is one of only a small selection of local posters on here and is pretty well liked, he goes close to the line sometimes but if you come down on stuff like that too hard you just end up with Newcastle Online, which is frankly unbearable. If you've read it for a long time then I put you in the 'need you head examined' category that I referred to earlier. Stevie well liked? Well I've had a multitude of PMs that counter that claim. I don't doubt that some like him but definitely not all. Anyway regardless of whether he's liked or not, he's continually transgressed (NOT as you put it 'goes close to the line sometimes') and despite being asked to cut out certain aspects of his posting, he's continued effectively sticking 2 fingers up to those who manage the place and attempt to keep order. That's not just me btw. As one member said earlier to me, if people want to run their own forum with the own rules then they can do so otherwise STFU and that they've often thought to themselves 'What must some people think' who are just browsing as guests etc. A bit embarrassing really from that standpoint. Especially if you realise people from other clubs, the media etc. will be reading messageboards from time to time. As for ending up like N-O, this is only the second person who has been removed from TT in almost 5 years. It's hardly like we've got a 'forum of the banned'. Anyway - he's gone. Get over it. No idea how old you are Craig but under 16 would be my guess. Canny post that. Well and truely took your ball and went home. well done Double it and add a year. No ball's been taken, I've answered the criticism and you evidently don't like it. Far from me taking the ball home, I'm still here but you've refusing to play because you don't like the rules Youve answered the criticism by dodging bullets. You wont name names or say specific instances.. Your handling of Stevies banning has been rather LLambias like dare i say.

Come back when've caught up with everything son... I've read this forum for a long time, son, but a typical condescending reply from yourself from up there on the horse. Stevie is one of only a small selection of local posters on here and is pretty well liked, he goes close to the line sometimes but if you come down on stuff like that too hard you just end up with Newcastle Online, which is frankly unbearable. If you've read it for a long time then I put you in the 'need you head examined' category that I referred to earlier. Stevie well liked? Well I've had a multitude of PMs that counter that claim. I don't doubt that some like him but definitely not all. Anyway regardless of whether he's liked or not, he's continually transgressed (NOT as you put it 'goes close to the line sometimes') and despite being asked to cut out certain aspects of his posting, he's continued effectively sticking 2 fingers up to those who manage the place and attempt to keep order. That's not just me btw. As one member said earlier to me, if people want to run their own forum with the own rules then they can do so otherwise STFU and that they've often thought to themselves 'What must some people think' who are just browsing as guests etc. A bit embarrassing really from that standpoint. Especially if you realise people from other clubs, the media etc. will be reading messageboards from time to time. As for ending up like N-O, this is only the second person who has been removed from TT in almost 5 years. It's hardly like we've got a 'forum of the banned'. Anyway - he's gone. Get over it. No idea how old you are Craig but under 16 would be my guess. Canny post that. Well and truely took your ball and went home. well done

how much bitching in this thread. acting like kids. does sum1 wanna lock this down and delete it? I'd post and read on NO if i wanted this shit