Snake

They STILL haven't twigged on that Keegan said that the same 4 teams finishing in the first 4 places in the league every year was what he found boring and NOT last day title/relegation deciders

She's one classy bird

Theres a world of difference. Everton have the one thing we havnt had for years now. Stability. Agreed, we should have stuck with Souness

Agree completely

Keegan confirms he's staying

True but my money would be on a bad thing

Metro Radio are saying that Keegan has forbidden the players from talking to the press after the match.

I'd fancy us at home but not away

Slave labour that

9m for Woodgate, 18m for Modric. It looks like we'll buy both youth and established first teamers

Definitely and rather than splash out £20m/£100k per week on players on their way down I for one am delighted at the long term approach

George Orwell... the fans are staging a protest against thaksin shinawatra at man cuty and we still get most of the coverage for a board meeting the press no fuck all about The two title contenders better hope that nothing happens at NUFC before tomorrow otherwise they'll barely get a mention

Are you questioning whether it's true, questioning whether it should impact the level of investment, or just plain annoyed that it's been mentioned more than once? all three actually , im pretty sure we were told 80 mill at first , then they stuck the transfer fee's from last season on it and started throwing around the 100mill number as how much had been invested , now thats just purely debt apparently so yeah im not sure if its true . you dont buy clubs and 100 mill debt pops up out of nowhere aswell . should it impact investment ? its being used as a reason for lack of it , but is it our problem that the club was bought and the new owner supposedly found this debt ? whats the debt for aswell , is it debt owed out in the future ? or debt we have now ,as ive heard stories that some of its for players transfer fee's thats still due ect , (only forked out 4 mill so far for oba ) if thats the case the money is in the player and nothing is lost , sell the player and get money back plus some of the debt . The actual debt as per the accounts when Ashley took over was £80 million I think and was rising by £1 million every month. It is well documented that extra 'hidden debt' was found when his team looked deeper Is there any evidence it was rising by £1m a month? I genuinely interested. http://www.newcastlefcweb.co.uk/Latest-New..._laid_bare_.php

Otherwise I'm sure a repeat of this is nailed on tomorrow http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/t...utd/7393800.stm

The debt we all knew about. We all knew we were somewhere between 60-70 million in the red but £100 million was too much. Why do you think every other consortium couldn't get out of the city quick enough after conducting due dilligence. I've nee idea what you're going on about when you talk about the debt rising. We're debt free now and have been for months, Mort has said as much. There is nothing to say we aren't going to spend about from a few shite articles. Chin up. ive no idea about the 1mill debt rising either , just asking snake what he was on about . so there was 30mill worth off debt that caught him offguard ? he bought the club for 134m , spent 100m on debt . so he got the toon for 234 ? and the clubs income this year was 100mill ? We were paying out more money than we were bringing in, to the tune of about £1m per month

Are you questioning whether it's true, questioning whether it should impact the level of investment, or just plain annoyed that it's been mentioned more than once? all three actually , im pretty sure we were told 80 mill at first , then they stuck the transfer fee's from last season on it and started throwing around the 100mill number as how much had been invested , now thats just purely debt apparently so yeah im not sure if its true . you dont buy clubs and 100 mill debt pops up out of nowhere aswell . should it impact investment ? its being used as a reason for lack of it , but is it our problem that the club was bought and the new owner supposedly found this debt ? whats the debt for aswell , is it debt owed out in the future ? or debt we have now ,as ive heard stories that some of its for players transfer fee's thats still due ect , (only forked out 4 mill so far for oba ) if thats the case the money is in the player and nothing is lost , sell the player and get money back plus some of the debt . The actual debt as per the accounts when Ashley took over was £80 million I think and was rising by £1 million every month. It is well documented that extra 'hidden debt' was found when his team looked deeper

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/arti...mp;in_page_id=1 Must have been very cramped in that meeting room

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport...icle1147346.ece :D

And rightly so IMO. Agreed, especially if ambition was promised when he was persuaded to take the job

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport...icle1143197.ece make's me sick this kind of reporting , dare i say a new low for the sun and nufc, but then again probably not . if keegan even considered any of those supposed demands id be insulted , question his loyalty to us ? ashley wouldnt be so stupid and he definately doesnt seem the type of guy they are making him out tobe . they have really ran with this story then ehh , sven has hardly got a sniff with nufc having something to write about , they love to hate us . Custis yet again, Allardyce's big mate. No doubt Shepherd's fuelling it at times too

how comes i didnt get a mention? Who are you like? im ur dad Then you'd be welcome in the brave new world. Ask for more pocket money

Out for 3 to 6 months I'm told

Fuck me, Lee Ryder's at it anarl http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/nufc/newcas...72703-20879183/ GEORDIE boy Steve Watson feels that Kevin Keegan’s carefree approach ahead of Sunday’s clash with Everton will probably be the last thing the Toffees want to face as they look to close in on a place in the UEFA Cup

Geordie boy Alan Thompson no less Oliver must be on a 'Geordie boy' bonus