manc-mag

God, you're tiresome *said with hands on hips*

do fuck off you stupid prick Bitter?

Real Ale Twat imagery to one side, there are some magnificent breweries around these days turning out some fantastic ales and more and more pubs are starting to have at least one guest cask on. It's a brilliant time for english beer. John Smiths is summat you might drink at home at a push if you've only got the local off licence at your disposal.

Says a lot for the pub if you drink John Smiths like. Have they nothing decent on cask?

One hell of a shoeing all the same. Reminds me of Jack 'Ironfists' London, Viz's 'consumer champion'. Stevie's given him the millimetre tread for good measure tbh.

I think Keegan leaving ( in most fans eyes ) was a bit more than fairweather. I also love the way you want to take issue with me leaving over Keegan, yet you have no issue with all those in this thread who want to leave because of Hughton. Infact you feel so strongly about it you havent even participted in this thread until I have reinstated it today. I think the truth is your sitting on your airbed seething and stalking away. Out of interest, how many games have you been to this season? He doesn't even live in the North East you doil. A toon home game is a £200 effort for him. You live in a NE postcode area, probably by about 250 yards before it goes to SR like. All this fairweather bollocks, you're criticising people who aren't going next season because they say they're not going, when you've admitted that your perception of where the club is going i.e is an upturn in fortunes and quality of playing staff is the reason why you're going back. The reason a lot of people aren't going back is because of the board of directors and the owner. Good reasons if you ask me, they don't want to watch a club owned by a leach who's ONLY objective is to get as much money as he possibly can for the club acting in a manner where he deliberately antagonises supporters, makes shockingly bad errors of judgement, and has NEVER apologised once for any of these mistakes he's made, and he's continuing to do so. The people who aren't coming back are going to stay away through principle, exactly the same principles that many fans turned their backs on the club through 1989 to 1992, a board of directors taking the piss, so don't dare have a go at people who are leaving. It's fuck all to do with the shit on the pitch, if it were there'd be no cunt there from 2006 onwards. You are a mug, and the more you post the more evident it becomes to me that it's possible you're either a fuckin potential Fred West, or you're an intricate mackem WUM. FWIW, I love the toon, I'll support the players, and from a stance where I was never going back, I know fine well in my heart of hearts I will go next season whatever division we're in because I'm a mug and I love the black and white, I'm one of the ones McKeag took the piss out of, but anyone who turns their back on NUFC because of this fat cunt, should be totally exempt from criticism, whereas you're admitting you're going back because you're a glory hunter. A pretty fucking deluded one at that. For the first time in my life time Sunderland are a much much better club than the toon in terms of staff infrastructure to finance and playing staff, they have a brighter future than us as long as Ashley is here. You're an embarrassment to this message board and everyone who defines themself as Newcastle United fan. Just lobbing that in too Stevie as it's the only thing you forgot.

Fucking joy the quotes from that series.

I'm visualizing Andy Moller in a blazer and jeans.

Fucking Hell, I'm not saying it's DEFINITELY easier to get a result with ten men, I'm saying (and have from the start) that's it's NOT DEFINITELY easier to get a result against 10 men. Am I speaking fucking Swahili? and fwiw I've never been great at football, never claimed to be, but I've certainly played and other than trying to find a photo there's fuck all I can do to prove it, so I'll not bother if it's all the same and I'll not waste my time. Fuck me, I know I sound huffy, but it does bother me... people who know nowt about me are dismissing opinions based on nothing but your casual supposition.

It's not a fallacy to say it's easier to win against ten men than eleven, you dope. So why is that so often 10 men hold out (or win) against 11? I'm not saying that is definitely harder to beat 10 men, just that's it's not definitely easier. Here's a hypothetical situation for you: You have been appointed to a senior position in the FA - once they saw on your CV that you've never kicked a ball in your life, the job was yours to lose - and you are not required to be impartial. You are given the option to implement a new law whereby every team that plays Newcastle in the league can only field a team of ten men. You want Newcastle to have the best chance of winning every game, do you implement this new law or not? To conclude, of course it's fucking easier playing with an extra man. If it's so easy, why then are there so many examples of ten men holding out against more men? I mean, by your logic everytime the opposition goes down to 10 men, the full strength team should win... given that it's Always easier. I mean, it's not like a team of ten men change their formation to pack out the defence, or change their tactics, retreating to their own half.. No, nowt like that. fuck off you twat Defeating 10 men is only easier if the manager of the weakened side keeps things as they are. Which he won't. fwiw I have to give Mancmag some credit, he's started a rumour I've never kicked a ball and it's stuck, with hilarious consequences. Tbf Dave, if it was actually harder to beat a team with 10 men then you'd always start with 10 men. That's logic. As for you never kicking a ball, if by some chance you have started playing football since I started that 'rumour' then I'm willing to bet the reality is even more hilarious than the rumour itself. You couldn't trap a bag of wet cement and you fucking well know it.

the "6 pointers" are the most crucial, but we have already lost 2 of those at home, and drew another. Yes we know. Albeit the point he was making was about future games (because the past is the past and theres nothing to be played for there) it was nonetheless still acknowledged within his post anyway. sorry, but was that reply meant for Rob who also answered ? I'll wait for Tom to reply himself thanks, dickhead I realise he mean't future games btw. 2 years ago we also know we lost at home to Hull and didn't win the away game to make up for it. One day you might make a useful comment man without being obsessed with replying to me. It can apply to either of you. But you made the point, he merely agreed. If we obsess about games where we've lost points it's not going to assist us in picking up points in future, psychologically. We have to go into all of our winnable games with a clean slate, rather than being defeatist about the fact we've already dropped points to those opponents.

Leazes, you have to make up your mind for once and for all whether you i) "couldn't give a shit" about what people on here think because their opinions are worthless or ii) you care an awful lot and require explanation after explanation for a person's views. Because obviously you can't have it both ways and that really shouldn't need to be pointed out to someone with your life experience.

the "6 pointers" are the most crucial, but we have already lost 2 of those at home, and drew another. Yes we know. Albeit the point he was making was about future games (because the past is the past and theres nothing to be played for there) it was nonetheless still acknowledged within his post anyway.

Correct.

Cheers for the nomination and thanks to all for the great craic throughout the year-yet another rollercoaster one for our club and yet another where this place has made the highs even better and the lows all the more bearable. Still the highlight of the internet for me even after all these years and that's due to the humour of the forum as a whole, so: Congrats to MF, a really deserved winner!

you're living proof that some students never grow up aye - but there is picture in wor attic that worries me................................ Alex in danger of pulling a muscle when he clocks this literary reference. Hope he's gone through his usual pre-keyboard warm up.

Jonny Fartpants will be pleased. I get that the subject matter is intensley laudible like so absolutely no disrespect to the work being done, but the thought of a load of six figure salaried suited execs and leading academics at a PARP meeting is just priceless. Dunno how Chez keeps a straight face. Puts me in mind of Le Courbussier et Papin.

Cute as a button. Annoying pose (not enough flesh)

I used to wear a lacoste tank top about 6 or 7 years ago, inspired by none less than John Gregory. http://www.wardrobeclothing.co.uk/image/ca...128-500x667.jpg Anyone who knew what was good for them was rolling in this clobber. There isn't one occasion I could imagine that would be suitable for. Unless you were Mick Channon or a hummingbird that enjoyed golf.

Tragic news. RIP.

Anyone who wore those tank tops to school (not the golfing ones) got asked whether their nan had died before she'd finished knitting the sleeves. To a man, mercilessly and on a daily basis. Until they got the fucking message.

http://shop.uniqlo.com/uk/goods/066084 Who's wearing shit like that? I wouldn't get buried in it. Jesus Tonight! That's got some answering to do that jumper, mind.

I've just twigged what's going on here (because there are at least two hotter girls on the back row so this post just didn't quite scan), but basically the one at the front is a blonde version of your Laura out of the Apprentice.