manc-mag

More contrary bollocks from you. Have to agree. Trademark precious claptrap from Patrokles.

His cheeks will be glowing red with rage right now. any need for the 'with rage' bit? Precisely.

His cheeks will be glowing red with rage right now.

Ritchie wears jumpers without sleeves and can't be trusted.

I reckon this might be partially why you don't notice how police officers actually are. Please tell me you now specialise in housing law or something? cuckoo!

Fop you boss-eyed wank hound! If anything, Fish is the dissenting voice on many issues and he doesn't shy away from giving his opinion even when his is the minority voice.

Quality that!

At what stage does it become unacceptable irrespective of their celebrity btw? Presumably nobody wants an 80 year old's notch on their bedpost?

Any movement/further thoughts on this yet? Apparently wor lass has arranged to do some entertaining on this weekend (she organises weeks/months in advance like a military operation) and I'm expected to do my bit. I reckon I'll play whatever we sort out but just wondered if a different date was now favoured? Where's Cath when you reluctantly need her?

Scenes reminiscent of Rodney Marsh and George Best playing out their days at Fulham tbh. Only with less hair obviously.

Every fucker's a 5-a-side Maradonna!

Is that a telescope in your pocket....?

definitely there's very few famous people I wouldnt do just so i could tell my mates down the pub! if i wasnt married of course Patrick Moore?

Nah, that one wouldn't work on me, I have to admit. Said in the third person in the style of the Hunny Monster

She's got a very sexy gravelly voice apparently. I'd phone sex it. I'd be up for that, as long as she didnt come out with any anti-arab shit halfway through. That's unnacceptable.

Even if only just to be able to say you'd done it...?

73 eh? Anyone still would?

Correct but they're good from the point of view of getting kids into reading imo. Adults who've read the whole series however... I it's unprecedented on that level so fair do's. The films on the other hand are unmitigated shit.

That's the bit I didn't get-what a shit example to use. Sounds like the type who just doesn't like 'stories' generally.

Harry Potter is unmitigated shit.

How do you make that out? to be honest, Fop will stick a smiley on the end of a lot of posts inferring a greater depth to his words. Often times his words are pretty staid and as poignant as anybody else's, bu this addition of a smiley, in his mind, affords him some degree of gravitas and profundity... when really he's said nothing of note. Mancy is right (as much as anybody who's geographically and stylistically inept can be) but Fop will merrily carousel until the boredom sets in and at that point he will declare himself the winner. Anyone who deems fit to challenge will again be met with a barrage of inane detritus wrapped as sense and formula. Edit:- I'm a true blue sesquipedalian My feeling was and without resorting to his normal largesse Fop was holding his own against a pretty early use of condescending small weapons fire. On the other hand Manc tried to back out early doors seeing the morass his lectors had been drawn into caught as they were in a ravine flanked by the two hills of Fops unwavering quasi-rationale. His Romulus (Sunday supplement style phraseology) and his Remus ( the instinctive need to have a pop at plod). You're not fucking kidding, there. The lad is off his tits.

For a solicitor you're pretty crap at debate it has to be said. Honestly, I am going to take that as a compliment.

If you want to pretend my argument has changed or was hysterical that's fine with me, it's what you're trained and paid to do after all. Still doesn't make you right though. Wearing your opponent down with defective reason and italics (for a change). Waste of fucking time tbh. As I said right from the get go...there is absolutely no way either of us can be proved right or wrong. My logic is sound at least. Your "logic" is contrived and based upon a situation where you're least likely to actually see that sort behaviour. Mine is based upon actual events. You yourself state not to go without a solicitor, which really goes to show that either you know the police will have you if they can, or you think Ewerk did whatever he did. Unless you know something I don't about Ewerk, you are basically agree with me, whether you'll ever admit it or not. You are off your tits. You genuinely don't have a clue what youre talking about.

Thanks for the advice, unfortunately they had already picked me up an hour before you posted. I asked them about how the bail would affect my travelling and they said there were no restrictions on it and immigration on the US side wouldn't know anything about it. I didn't take a lawyer with me though to be honest I don't think having one would have been much of a benefit, it was basically as they told me, just a discussion of the incident (which lasted two and a half fucking hours). I seemed to be lucky in getting two sound coppers, they weren't there to trick me or catch me out, they just asked me straight forward questions and were straight down the line with me about what the allegations were and what would happen next. After the tapes had stopped rolling and they were showing me out they did even comment that the whole thing was 'fucking mental' which gives me a bit of confidence in them. I'm back home at the minute and had no plans of returning to Manchester in the forseeable future so that's why I wanted to get it dealt with today though my bail states that I have to return back on the 14th May which I imagine involves me getting a flight the whole way there, turned up to the station, signing something and then getting on a plane again. It was Grey Mare Lane Station in Eastlands, not the classiest joint in the world. Oh and Parky I did have to give a DNA sample as it was a recordable offence I was arrested for and I was told that even when I am cleared it is highly unlikely to be removed from the database, but if I'm doing nothing wrong then I've nothing to worry about. Hope it all gets resolved mate. If you do need any general advice just pm me. Re your bail, you want to get tel. contact details for the officers to find out nearer to the time whether it's actually necessary for you to come back on the 14th (seeing as it'd mean coming over from Ireland?). You don't want a wasted journey. Grey Mare Lane is a shit tip innit?! :lol:I can actually see it from my apartment in fact. Finally, I'm harsh on my profession generally (generally cos I think lawyers tend to be self important arseholes) but I would still say always take a solicitor with you to the police station. If only to know where you stand.

If you want to pretend my argument has changed or was hysterical that's fine with me, it's what you're trained and paid to do after all. Still doesn't make you right though. Wearing your opponent down with defective reason and italics (for a change). Waste of fucking time tbh. As I said right from the get go...there is absolutely no way either of us can be proved right or wrong. My logic is sound at least.