Jump to content

manc-mag

Donator
  • Posts

    16306
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by manc-mag

  1. The N-O contingent are too young to have grown bitter yet tbh. 80776[/snapback] They're all twenty tbh.
  2. Yes, but logged in as HTT 80753[/snapback]
  3. Gemmills a red haired gypsy too. 80707[/snapback] Strawberry blonde 80718[/snapback] fat, dull, old and not here to defend himself. 80736[/snapback] He might be fat dull and old but he definitely is not strawberry blonde.
  4. Gemmills a red haired gypsy too.
  5. Same person tbh 80676[/snapback] As I've said before, which would certainly explain why his heed exploded after KCG's thread had a go at T27 for being a moron and why he claims T27 is a world class wum. 80689[/snapback] Next time T27's on we need to start the anti-shark banter. Throw some chum in the water, see what happens.
  6. Don't start that shite again. 80685[/snapback] Over the line IMO Jesus this forum is uptight!
  7. Is it called Greggs up in the North East too then?
  8. He's still bitter about the split then? 80443[/snapback] Shortest piece he's ever written tbh. Although it is vaguely amusing. 80453[/snapback] Agree about the vague amusement, I don't have a problem with that and contrary to his belief, I can actually laugh at myself - it's the double-standards which are making me chuckle... If we'd have done something like that about N-O, we'd have got a 10,000 word response all about how 'snide' and 'low' we are.... 80458[/snapback] Short or not after reading this thread thru and the one on NO as well I have come to the conclusion that it's the same old shite rehashed for a stir. So it's felt that a chomp was achieved- bully for whomever then. That still doesn't excuse the fact it's nothing but crap worded very prettily but in truth really says fuck all. As stated privately I'd seriously think about having a bit of a go at the maturity level of this all but considering my age I truly feel I'd die of natural causes before getting half way thru a verbose, but substanceless reply by the aggrandized wordmaster himself. 80651[/snapback] I actually thought it was quite funny and have therefore come to the conclusion he had help writing it. The thing is though I can happily read stuff like that-it's banter and I see it as banter and as long as its funny I'm entertained. Unfortunately (as has been stated elsewehere) the problem is consistency in interpretation. Too often he interprets N-O referenced banter as anti-N-O banter. It's a bit bizarre really. I think its that he's lost all sense of perspective if I'm being honest. He just takes it too personally. Incidentally I can see how lots of people find it all a bit tedious (regardless of whether you think its genuine nastiness or just a joke/banter). I still find it funny though on balance.
  9. Gemmill's got one of those t-shirts. In XXXL
  10. No one, I just quite like chunky thighs, like Beyonce. I'll use a " " next time 80606[/snapback] "over the line" tbh. How uptight is this forum? 80610[/snapback] You didn't think I was pissed off did you? Have I been whooshed? 80612[/snapback] You steaming turd. It was a reference to Newcastle Rocker's hyper-sensitivity, as displayed in the 11-a-side thread.
  11. No one, I just quite like chunky thighs, like Beyonce. I'll use a " " next time 80606[/snapback] "over the line" tbh. How uptight is this forum?
  12. Who rattled your cage liyke?
  13. Going back to my housing law days (a long time ago like) I'm pretty sure theres a magic figure of ten years in which the L.A could take action if they became aware of the breach of the permission. Thats why I said that it in practice you probably wouldnt experience any repurcussions if you didnt get permission as the L.A. would not be aware of it in any event (though it might be a deterrent to a future buyer). I'd run it by your builder though as he sounds kosher and will be well aware of the situation. Don't think he's just trying to drum up business for his mate-though you could always use somebody else if you get the feeling he's too hard sell on that. 80159[/snapback] So what about this new thing Prescott is bringing in, you pay more tax if you've got a conservatory or a loft conversion, I even read that they are gonna use satelites to see if houses have had work done. So do i need to get some camoflage for my velux's? Or maybe a blind with a roof tile pattern on? 80165[/snapback] Satellites to detect loft conversions? As for Prescotts plans (that I've not heard anything about incidentally) that sounds more like a revenue issue than a planning permission issue. You'd need to run that past your independent financial advisor.
  14. Dunno who she is. Made me think of Libby Kennedy though of Neighbours which is never bad. The epitomy of borderline. 80132[/snapback] 80140[/snapback] Hound tbh! 80156[/snapback] You haven't watched the show (I'd like to point out I don't watch the show anymore) 80158[/snapback] gone blind tbh
  15. Going back to my housing law days (a long time ago like) I'm pretty sure theres a magic figure of ten years in which the L.A could take action if they became aware of the breach of the permission. Thats why I said that it in practice you probably wouldnt experience any repurcussions if you didnt get permission as the L.A. would not be aware of it in any event (though it might be a deterrent to a future buyer). I'd run it by your builder though as he sounds kosher and will be well aware of the situation. Don't think he's just trying to drum up business for his mate-though you could always use somebody else if you get the feeling he's too hard sell on that.
  16. Might well need permission (or some other L.A. clearance) depending on the extent of the work. Wouldnt have anyone ripping it out if you didnt like, but could be a problem if you were trying to sell it on in the next ten years as the work wouldnt have been sanctioned and a buyer would be aware of this (and would still be within the time period for the L.A to take retrospective action-possibly against the new owner). Like I say though, the need for permission would probably depend on the nature of the job.
  17. Day fawa in tha big brutha hooooose. AF is in the diary room...... 80130[/snapback] ....writing lyrics and moaning about northerners.... 80136[/snapback] ......Alex and Catmag are comparing bald spots.
  18. As before !!!! 80133[/snapback] FUCK-ME-GENTLY!
  19. Dunno who she is. Made me think of Libby Kennedy though of Neighbours which is never bad. The epitomy of borderline.
  20. Day fawa in tha big brutha hooooose. AF is in the diary room......
  21. I'll take my puppies then 80122[/snapback]
  22. 80107[/snapback] He's writing a fucking long post, that's for sure.... either that or he's written a new lyric and gone to crack one off about it 80110[/snapback] Where did you come from...you see...? Just one at a time will be fine 80118[/snapback] You telling me when I can and cannot post on my own forum? Odds are shortening tbh.. 80121[/snapback]
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.