manc-mag

I wouldn't start name calling again if I were you smartlad Ok, that made sense. Just shush fwiw.

If you'd just kept your mouth shut you'd have come out of this thread alright Leazes. Theres a lesson for you there.

She was a bit of a dick in the end. 'My parents had to sacrifice a lot for me, £26,000 a year school fees meant they didnt drive the very best cars or have the wardrobe they wanted' Geordie lass 'my parents never sacrificed fuck all for me cos they never had fuck all' The posh lass then went on to doubt either the ability for the girls to get jobs or whether they were really poor because they lived in houses with 'all the mod cons' which i presume meant TVs and washing machines etc. Found her distasteful but typical of someone with her background. Am pretty sure the Lesbian host used to live on Summerhill terrace too. Basically stated it was to further her 'political' career. So not doing it with the end of learning from people from different backgrounds, but basically just so she could pass herself off as empathic and electable. She was probably the most embarrassing of the lot in many ways.

She was a bit of a dick in the end. 'My parents had to sacrifice a lot for me, £26,000 a year school fees meant they didnt drive the very best cars or have the wardrobe they wanted' Geordie lass 'my parents never sacrificed fuck all for me cos they never had fuck all' The posh lass then went on to doubt either the ability for the girls to get jobs or whether they were really poor because they lived in houses with 'all the mod cons' which i presume meant TVs and washing machines etc. Found her distasteful but typical of someone with her background. Am pretty sure the Lesbian host used to live on Summerhill terrace too. Looks like Hufty off the Word. It is her, isn't it? I saw her on the trailer. A divvint naa av just seen the pic. Going to watch it tonight. I'd be fucking astonished if there were two people by the name of Hufty looking like that knocking about. What was her catchphrase again?: "We're hevvin a cushty time!" Jesus tonight.

If they're from London, how the fuck have they never seen a 'rough council estate' before? What a load of old shite.

Egotistical mug he is. I really believe Man City should be nearer to Chelsea and Man Utd than they are already. Awful tactics too, was painful watching a £600m team struggle against Greeks and Poles last season and to be fair in two games against us they were very fucking lucky, we deserved at least a draw in both games imo. They're not really a £600 million team though tbf. City have paid massively over the odds on numerous occasions because 1. every selling club knows they're loaded and 2. they're not a fashionable destination. Sunderland have to do the same on a smaller scale.

Harsh tbf.

Don't be soft, he's better looking than me by a long chalk but I'm still not having the comparison.

Class.

What a load of patent dogshit.

You've got the look of a more slimline Mark Viduka like. What a load of patent dogshit.

Time to get your photos up here and be judged tbh. Majority thread verdicts to be final.

Get the updates in this thread mate, when you're up and running and in a position to say what it's about.

George Best on Wogan tbh.

Basically he was caught in Ferguson's house and Big Dunc sat on his face. Chez has gilded the lilly a bit since then.

Have you tried having a coherent discussion with CT? I'm not offended by his politics, I'm offended by him simply being him. He's the type of bloke you wouldn't want to share oxygen with in a pub. In real liife, every bloke I've met who has CT's characteristics has been a mackem as well. Make of that what you will . And for the record, I'd be a complete hypocrite for wanting to get CT banned, he's done nothing remotely bannable, after all. I just simply can't enjoy any threads the blokes posts on. I realise this is my problem not his, but I'm canny glad I'm not the only one who feels this way. If you think he's wrong, you don't have to actually discuss it with him. You can just lay out your reasoning as to why he is wrong, pointing out the facts and so on, and build your argument from there. It's good to have people challenge and question your beliefs, as it makes you think them through and this can actually strengthen your ability to argue and make points. You don't have to attempt to convert CT to your cause. As to the statement in bold, that seems awfully snobby. You should try associating with some of the people I've had to be around and work with in Warrington; obnoxious and belligerent people who make CT look like fucking Einstein, I'm not exaggerating that much. He seems a perfectly civil chap in that regard. He even has moments of good humour. That's a canny post and I accept you have a good point. Definitley much worse people than CT around, he just rubs me up the wrong way for some reason, especially about 3 months ago when I was at a low point. I should be more tolerant but it wouldn't hurt CT to be a bit more contrite on occassion either imo. I'll tell you what mind, I'm willing to bet Peasepud would be hard pushed to find one of CT's tax returns with £70k declared income on it. The wife told me that one of the amusing aspects of her job is the expression on taxi driver's faces seeking compensation for loss of work after a crash. Apparently they all work 8 hour weeks according to their tax returns..... Personal injury law! She's got a lot of patience I'll give her that. And then she has to go home to you ffs!

Fuck, totally forgot about that. You're still leaving though, right? I see no problem with letting us see her now. I have no pics. Would have sent you one if I did. No facebook, nada. My phone is old and has no camera etc. Sorry. She's not attractive at any rate, I just felt if the opportunity presented itself, morally I had to do it. Whats her name, so I can go around randomly checking name badges next time I'm in the store?

On the soft I hope?

You think I'm trying to be ironic? Not so. I merely think it would be wrong for CT to be banned, and am explaining my reasoning. One of the main reasons this forum is enjoyable is because there is not the heavy-handed and stifling moderation of somewhere like N-O. When someone uses italics in a post, it generally infers they're being sarcastic (or maybe ironic, but I wouldn't have immediately guessed) When someone is in italic at the bottom of the page it means they're posting and KSA's name was in italics for ages. Hope that clears things up and you two can dry hump the fuck out of each other now Never knew that rule I confess, I was referring to the bottom of the page thingy. Yeah, I totally believe that. see? it's easy Mancy Baby, I'll make sure you stay relevant. I'm street, y'see Sorry I did know that, before anyone thinks I've got online aspergers or summat. Just didn't make sense to me in the context of KSA's post.

Have you tried having a coherent discussion with CT? I'm not offended by his politics, I'm offended by him simply being him. He's the type of bloke you wouldn't want to share oxygen with in a pub. In real liife, every bloke I've met who has CT's characteristics has been a mackem as well. Make of that what you will . And for the record, I'd be a complete hypocrite for wanting to get CT banned, he's done nothing remotely bannable, after all. I just simply can't enjoy any threads the blokes posts on. I realise this is my problem not his, but I'm canny glad I'm not the only one who feels this way. If you think he's wrong, you don't have to actually discuss it with him. You can just lay out your reasoning as to why he is wrong, pointing out the facts and so on, and build your argument from there. It's good to have people challenge and question your beliefs, as it makes you think them through and this can actually strengthen your ability to argue and make points. You don't have to attempt to convert CT to your cause. As to the statement in bold, that seems awfully snobby. You should try associating with some of the people I've had to be around and work with in Warrington; obnoxious and belligerent people who make CT look like fucking Einstein, I'm not exaggerating that much. He seems a perfectly civil chap in that regard. He even has moments of good humour. That's a canny post and I accept you have a good point. Definitley much worse people than CT around, he just rubs me up the wrong way for some reason, especially about 3 months ago when I was at a low point. I should be more tolerant but it wouldn't hurt CT to be a bit more contrite on occassion either imo. I'll tell you what mind, I'm willing to bet Peasepud would be hard pushed to find one of CT's tax returns with £70k declared income on it.

You think I'm trying to be ironic? Not so. I merely think it would be wrong for CT to be banned, and am explaining my reasoning. One of the main reasons this forum is enjoyable is because there is not the heavy-handed and stifling moderation of somewhere like N-O. When someone uses italics in a post, it generally infers they're being sarcastic (or maybe ironic, but I wouldn't have immediately guessed) When someone is in italic at the bottom of the page it means they're posting and KSA's name was in italics for ages. Hope that clears things up and you two can dry hump the fuck out of each other now Never knew that rule I confess, I was referring to the bottom of the page thingy.

You think I'm trying to be ironic? Not so. I merely think it would be wrong for CT to be banned, and am explaining my reasoning. One of the main reasons this forum is enjoyable is because there is not the heavy-handed and stifling moderation of somewhere like N-O.

KSA has been in itallics for fully fifteen minutes.

To the Phillipines?