Jump to content

The shit side of working in IT...


Craig
 Share

Recommended Posts

  Shearergol said:
Not a bad idea though is it. If you get caught for doing something dodgy, post all the details on a forum and then claim you wouldn't get a fair trial.

127811[/snapback]

So you're saying that Craig is the mystery perv? :icon_lol::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  Meenzer said:
  Shearergol said:
Not a bad idea though is it. If you get caught for doing something dodgy, post all the details on a forum and then claim you wouldn't get a fair trial.

127811[/snapback]

So you're saying that Craig is the mystery perv? :icon_lol::lol:

127812[/snapback]

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  J69 said:
  ewerk said:
  J69 said:
  Craig said:
  J69 said:
  Craig said:
  J69 said:
me too! the case, if it gets to court, will be chucked out anyway cos theres evidence posted all over the internet now!

127546[/snapback]

 

:icon_lol:

 

Have a fucking word with yourselves man, planet earth is back down here!

127561[/snapback]

 

just cos your arse is twtiching like a rabbits now :lol:

127576[/snapback]

 

WTF are you on about? :lol:

127708[/snapback]

 

 

the fact that if this gets to court and its found out that evidence is on the internet and has provoked a 4 page discussion over his guilt or innocence then it will be chucked out. you say its not important evidence but its the file list in question FFS! we did a little bit about trial by media in my law a-level and whilst this in no way makes me an expert im sure your company bosses wouldnt be chuffed that you fucked up their court case against the local paedo :angry:

 

 

 

 

 

 

:rolleyes:

127762[/snapback]

 

The only reason I could see for this interfering with a trial is if the guy couldn't get a fair trial because of the thread i.e. it influenced the jury. Tbh this forum is hardly the mass media and the chances of a potential juror viewing this thread is remote to say the least. Its not like we're dealing with the Sunday rags causing a retrial like in the Woodgate/Bowyer case.

127772[/snapback]

 

i know that, but there are plenty of lurkers on here from N-O. any solicitor worth his salt would be trying to get his client off by any means neccesary and if by a small chance word of this thread got round it would be like all his xmas's arriving at once. not saying he will like, and i know chances are itl never leave this board . . . . but . . . . i hope craigs conscience could cope if he contributed to a paedo getting off on a technicality like that :lol:

127781[/snapback]

 

Jesus fucking wept......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Craig said:
  J69 said:
  ewerk said:
  J69 said:
  Craig said:
  J69 said:
  Craig said:
  J69 said:
me too! the case, if it gets to court, will be chucked out anyway cos theres evidence posted all over the internet now!

127546[/snapback]

 

:icon_lol:

 

Have a fucking word with yourselves man, planet earth is back down here!

127561[/snapback]

 

just cos your arse is twtiching like a rabbits now :lol:

127576[/snapback]

 

WTF are you on about? :lol:

127708[/snapback]

 

 

the fact that if this gets to court and its found out that evidence is on the internet and has provoked a 4 page discussion over his guilt or innocence then it will be chucked out. you say its not important evidence but its the file list in question FFS! we did a little bit about trial by media in my law a-level and whilst this in no way makes me an expert im sure your company bosses wouldnt be chuffed that you fucked up their court case against the local paedo :angry:

 

 

 

 

 

 

:rolleyes:

127762[/snapback]

 

The only reason I could see for this interfering with a trial is if the guy couldn't get a fair trial because of the thread i.e. it influenced the jury. Tbh this forum is hardly the mass media and the chances of a potential juror viewing this thread is remote to say the least. Its not like we're dealing with the Sunday rags causing a retrial like in the Woodgate/Bowyer case.

127772[/snapback]

 

i know that, but there are plenty of lurkers on here from N-O. any solicitor worth his salt would be trying to get his client off by any means neccesary and if by a small chance word of this thread got round it would be like all his xmas's arriving at once. not saying he will like, and i know chances are itl never leave this board . . . . but . . . . i hope craigs conscience could cope if he contributed to a paedo getting off on a technicality like that :lol:

127781[/snapback]

 

Jesus fucking wept......

127835[/snapback]

 

I know! I imagine he's the only person on here who thinks you've got any sort of conscience at all. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  J69 said:
my feelings exactly! i know that you are oblivious to any sort of sarcasm in my posts but the rest of the posters in here seem to get it  :lol:

127837[/snapback]

 

Aye right, a four page page thread on an intranet forum which outlines neither the company, the location or the individual is gonna stand as a case collapser! :icon_lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this really is whooshing you isnt it. that laughing smilie at the end of the post indictated that i didnt really think this thread was going to get him off. you even quoted me saying i was being sarcastic. keep up!

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  J69 said:
this really is whooshing you isnt it. that laughing smilie at the end of the post indictated that i didnt really think this thread was going to get him off. you even quoted me saying i was being sarcastic. keep up!

 

.

127849[/snapback]

 

Then why fucking bring it up in the first place you fucking mong! :icon_lol:

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Meenzer said:
So you're saying that Craig is the mystery perv?  :icon_lol:  :lol:

127812[/snapback]

 

Ask yourself one question, is the the serene, contented face of a man who's just enjoyed the dubious pleasures of kiddy porn?

 

http://www.toontastic.net/forum/uploads/photo-3.jpg

 

EDIT (Craig): Howay man, don't post it about.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  luckypierre said:
fuckin hell, give it a rest man. You've never had an opinion on something that was wrong like Gol?

127872[/snapback]

 

Are you really suggesting Sutton should have made PFA XI of the year? He joined Birmingham too late for a start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Gemmill said:
  Craig said:
  Gemmill said:
Craig is running scared tbh. :icon_lol:

127874[/snapback]

 

Am I? :lol:

127877[/snapback]

 

:lol:

127878[/snapback]

 

OK, whatever you say..... :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.