Leaderboard

I’m 12. YOU FUCKING PAEDO.

HOW CAN WE EXPECT CORBYN TO BLOW THE LOAD ON RUSSIA WHEN HE CAN'T EVEN DO IT IN HIS OWN WIFE?!?!!?!!!!

Or if it was Corbyn, let's be honest.

Aye but nationalisation inevitably restricts consumer choice so the only genre available will be Diane Abbott themed hentai.

Also, only cowards turn their back on opponents.

I meant Sunderland

RAFA ARE YOU WATCHING

Maybe if he spent less time standing it would improve.

We won't have to, you'll keep reminding us

BOOM XHAKA LAK!

Free broadband piped to your caravan though innit. Uploading your bareknuckle call-out videos at breakneck speed. Just embrace it.

was all sounding quite promising till the last bit.

Plainly trying to get out of paying for one or more of them. Yes, let's have someone of that character running the country. If he lived on a council estate he'd be annihilated for that if for some reason he came to the attention of the tabloid press.

Refused to engage with questions about his kids or confirm how many he has. Can you think of anyone you know who won't answer a question about how many children they have? That is so fucking bizarre as to be mind-bending. He's allowed to get away with it by getting all "please I ask you to respect that I don't answer questions about my children", but I would love to see someone not let it drop and keep hammering him on how fucking odd it is that he isn't even prepared to settle on a total. Just fucking add them up and say the number, that's all.

I love it when you talk dirty.

A member of RTG has helpfully summarised their troubles https://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/it-cant-get-any-worse-than-this.1493812/post-30753582

Did I mention I find her strikingly beautiful and I have a strange longing to utter the words “yes mistress” to her?...

The only way she could have improved that delivery was taking a sip of her drink immediately after saying it. "... At a barbecue? *sip*" Sensational.

Naga is the most passive aggressive person in Western Europe. She’s like a human cactus

The same day as the president himself is sending tweets attacking a witness at the impeachment hearing. How anyone under the rule of law could accept it is beyond me - and I know what I am speaking of. It really is turning into dark times...

https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2019/11/he-put-the-milk-in-before-taking-the-teabag-out-hes-a-proper-nutcase-whos-going-to-pay-me-for-a-four-day-week-my-election-focus-groups-in-stoke-bolton-and-west-brom-2/ Some mental chat in there.

Well it also goes back to him being sacked by Michael Howard for blatantly lying about his affairs and children thereof.

sunluns strong team v Scunny's strongest team minus 5 players. Sorry for not making it clear.

Just one super relatable dude. Or "dewwd" as he pronounces it.

All the part-timers annoyed that they didn’t get to see Sterling in between Mexican waves and taking selfies.

Most things poll well for nationalisation - I think this would as well - those with a negative view of it tend to be people who have a bug bear about the 70s and perceived issues - probably pensioners who'll vote tory anyway. I think an argument about who owns services which benefit everyone is a good one to have - we shouldn't be frightened by dogma from 35/40 years ago when people can see utter failures like the probation service as examples of going too far. Maybe making it free is a stretch as then you could argue the same for other utilities but I think aiming for a reasonable cost would be fine.

The past three years have been defined by the tory red lines though - a more compromising set would invite a more reasonable deal.

It was reckless, intentional out of frustration as he was shielded from the ball and it endangered his opponents. A yellow would have been fair imo.

It’s to send a message to the rest of the continent. Square go at our gaff next July, bring your packed lunch.

Listen, I think Swinson has proven to be an arsehole in this campaign, but you can't expect her to do Labour a favour. They've left open goals and she is quite rightly booting the ball into the net for her own party's gain.

Can someone layout Corbyn's stance on the main issues in some easy bullet points please as I'm lost with him. Tar.

I'm not suggesting that Corbyn's position can't be understood if you're prepared to give it a couple of minutes thought. But it's also a position that can very easily be framed negatively by both of their main opposition parties. It's as easy for them to get their "Labour are confused" message to stick as it is for Labour to get their "well it goes like this...." message to stick. And that is a big problem.

Corbyn's stance isn't that overly complicated. It's just that the public only understands Leave or Remain. What's worse is that the PLP, membership and voters are all largely remain. Corbyn and those at the top have simply refused to go remain because of their own personal views and/or stubborness.

I want them to take a firm position that they can take to the electorate. If they can't confidently compete for votes with the Lib Dems then it's over for them anyway, so you can't worry about that. He's also made it easy for the Lib Dems to point at him and say "he's not Remain, we are". If he'd unequivocally come out for Remain, he would be able to more adequately compete with them for votes. Instead he's trying to walk a tightrope and letting the Lib Dems say "he's not Remain" and the Tories say "he's not Leave", and he's offering nothing in response. Take a position and argue for it like you mean it in a campaign. That is what wins people over. Corbyn has proven he can do that with social issues, the NHS etc. But in failing to do it on Brexit, he's lost the battle.

The fact that you keep seeing it is Labour's fundamental failure on Brexit though. Most people don't pay enough attention to politics for a nuanced message to cut through. And quite frankly Labour's position is as much confused as it is nuanced given they can't even commit to whether they would campaign for or against this deal they say they would negotiate. I mean you must have watched Labour MPs get asked this question and they refuse to answer it. You or I understand why they're refusing but most people aren't prepared to entertain the mental gymnastics that explain their reticence. They just think "this cunt doesn't know what they want on the biggest issue facing the country. I'm not voting for them." That is a fucking shambolic position to try to take to an electorate that already has a problem with the leader of the party. The fact is, perception is reality, and if you don't SAY you're a Remain party, then you're not a Remain party. How an organisation that operates in the world of politics where perception is ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING hasn't grasped this is beyond me.

And btw, on the face of it there's nothing wrong with Corbyn saying that they should have arrested that ISIS bloke... But why can this silly cunt not spot a trap question. The bloke is fucking dead. You don't need to offer up what would have been a better option cos he's dead. Just say "of course it's a good thing that he's no longer causing bother" and if they try and push you to say more shut it down: "he's dead. Move on. Next question."

nO! sTEVE bRUCE IS STILL A CUNT!

They do have a reality tv star for President, so it’s understandable.