AgentAxeman

Funniest bit was when Griffin said "I even went to Libya to tell to Gaddafi to stop funding the IRA" to which Straw said "yes and to ask him to start funding you!". yeah, but was it true?? i dont know enough to comment. please can someone enlighten me........ Fuck knows, and I don't care if it is to be honest as long as one of these wanky parties "lift the draw bridge". That Yassem Wasir or whatever performed even more poorly than Griffin. She could've walked off there, with her dignity intact, an intelligent voice for your British Muslim, she came across as arrogant and to me will have fuelled the fires of many all out racists. hmmmmmmmm, as i said earlier, i thought they were all pretty poor except for the lib dem guy (maybe cos he didnt say much). i dont know if i would describe her as arrogant tho. dont forget arrogance and intelligence walk hand in hand. you should know this from people who post on this forum!!

Funniest bit was when Griffin said "I even went to Libya to tell to Gaddafi to stop funding the IRA" to which Straw said "yes and to ask him to start funding you!". yeah, but was it true?? i dont know enough to comment. please can someone enlighten me........

i have no idea what % we're 'ethnic minority'. however if it was 35% then thats definatley biased towards the 'ethnic minority' considering, according to government stats it's only about 10/12% of the population (unless the government stats are false! god forbid)

like the labour government has never lied before!! sorry my picsine friend!!

meh! the nick griffin show was a major disapointment!! i dont think anyone came off the show with kudos! except maybe the lib dem fella (i never thought i would say that). and wtf did bonnie add to the show?? all liars and decievers imo!!

more likely be a shoe getting thrown at him

good post. however, just as many complete fuckwits are going to far left parties as well as far right. thought i would point that out. it's not just far right parties that have the monopoly on fuckwits. as to how to stop the apathy towards modern politics the answers staring you straight in the face. give the fringe parties (both right and left) a platform so that you are constantly not being battered with the same pov. I think this point has been proved by the amount of discussion both on here and also in the mainstream media since the guest list of tonights question time was announced. I wasnt going to watch this but i think i will now. should be tasty!!

Christ I remember watching that when it was on. These BNP women were holding a demo about the opening of a new mosque. When someone declined to listen to them one of the women shouted something like "What about when one of them rapes your daughter" Aye because there are only muslims rapists like Give them enough rope and they will hang themselves as pointed out tbf theres fuckwits of every political persuasion. people should remember that. i'm fairly certain, as with many other programs, that the show was edited to show them as being as fuckwitted as possible.

Rime of the ancient mariner - Iron Maiden

He's got glaucoma. You should get some we should all chip in and get some of those funky glasses for Parky!!

no bother lover!!

eh? Isn't that the Daily Mail line? sorry man, you've lost me........

eh? Edit: just had another read. what is it exactly i'm objecting to? gay people? gay marriage? equality? please tell me as i will need time to formulate my retort! Cheers!!

I'm not really all that surprised. tbh he brought in some proper shit players. even worse than some of NUFC's signings over the last couple of years imo!

International Law? Eh? Irrespective of whether the judgement is correct (I don't know anything about the case other than what it says in the Mail), it's people taking that inflamatory bollocks at face value that beggars belief. The comments are hilarious and scary with equal measure as well. "BNP all the way for me" etc. just because you dont like the the Mail or the BNP that doesnt mean everybody has to agree with you, but the fact is, if he's facing deportation in the 1st place then it must be because he's here ILLEGALLY. come on, think about it. the term 'ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT' has the word 'ILLEGAL' in it. that means its 'ILLEGAL' for said person to be here. its people that are dissmissive of said 'inflamatory bollocks' who are really scary as they are avoiding the issue. Illegal you say? Where have I said everyone has to agree with me btw? The FACT (see I can use capslock too) is the government thought he was here ILLEGALLY but the courts have ruled he has a LEGAL right to stay here. I didn't even say I thought the decision was correct, all I was saying was it's probably not the most balanced view you're getting from the Mail. The funny thing is though that all the people commenting there (many of whom live abroad ironically) are going on about Britain going to the dogs/cats when and saying it wouldn't happen elsewhere when I would say (given the ruling was based on HUMAN RIGHTS) that the judgement was made based on European Law we have signed up to via the Human Rights act. are you saying the government made a mistake signing up to the human rights act? (Joke!) I'm not going to argue about the EU or the human rights act cos quite simply i disagree with both of them (not the motives, just the implementation of both). just seems very strange to me that (Great)?? Britain thought it was illegal for him to stay, yet the Eu courts thought it was ok cos he has a cat (i know there was more). as i said earlier, he's broken the law and got away with it. does this not boil your piss? cos it sure does mine!! oh, and its Caps Lock (2 words). Its only on the button, ffs!! OOoooooOOO HE'S BROKEN THE LAW!!!!

no problem bud, but i still reckon he should have been sent home. he's broken the law and got away with it cos he's got a cat/lass/pots & pans etc........... By this logic does this mean i can rob the local post office?? I've got TWO cats, and a wife, and 2 kids, and lots of pots & pans!! Simples!! Needs to be added to cunt poll. you and me both brother!!

International Law? Eh? Irrespective of whether the judgement is correct (I don't know anything about the case other than what it says in the Mail), it's people taking that inflamatory bollocks at face value that beggars belief. The comments are hilarious and scary with equal measure as well. "BNP all the way for me" etc. just because you dont like the the Mail or the BNP that doesnt mean everybody has to agree with you, but the fact is, if he's facing deportation in the 1st place then it must be because he's here ILLEGALLY. come on, think about it. the term 'ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT' has the word 'ILLEGAL' in it. that means its 'ILLEGAL' for said person to be here. its people that are dissmissive of said 'inflamatory bollocks' who are really scary as they are avoiding the issue. Illegal you say? Where have I said everyone has to agree with me btw? The FACT (see I can use capslock too) is the government thought he was here ILLEGALLY but the courts have ruled he has a LEGAL right to stay here. I didn't even say I thought the decision was correct, all I was saying was it's probably not the most balanced view you're getting from the Mail. The funny thing is though that all the people commenting there (many of whom live abroad ironically) are going on about Britain going to the dogs/cats when and saying it wouldn't happen elsewhere when I would say (given the ruling was based on HUMAN RIGHTS) that the judgement was made based on European Law we have signed up to via the Human Rights act. are you saying the government made a mistake signing up to the human rights act? (Joke!) I'm not going to argue about the EU or the human rights act cos quite simply i disagree with both of them (not the motives, just the implementation of both). just seems very strange to me that (Great)?? Britain thought it was illegal for him to stay, yet the Eu courts thought it was ok cos he has a cat (i know there was more). as i said earlier, he's broken the law and got away with it. does this not boil your piss? cos it sure does mine!! oh, and its Caps Lock (2 words). Its only on the button, ffs!!

well its not really free if its costing you £10 a month!

and i bet you said that with a straight face as well!! Probably not as straight as yours was when you said "its people that are dissmissive of said 'inflamatory bollocks' who are really scary" wasnt straight, it had an ironic smirk on it!

no problem bud, but i still reckon he should have been sent home. he's broken the law and got away with it cos he's got a cat/lass/pots & pans etc........... By this logic does this mean i can rob the local post office?? I've got TWO cats, and a wife, and 2 kids, and lots of pots & pans!! Simples!!

and i bet you said that with a straight face as well!!

Sorry JawD, NSFW i thought it would be obvious as its playboy pics

International Law? Eh? Irrespective of whether the judgement is correct (I don't know anything about the case other than what it says in the Mail), it's people taking that inflamatory bollocks at face value that beggars belief. The comments are hilarious and scary with equal measure as well. "BNP all the way for me" etc. just because you dont like the the Mail or the BNP that doesnt mean everybody has to agree with you, but the fact is, if he's facing deportation in the 1st place then it must be because he's here ILLEGALLY. come on, think about it. the term 'ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT' has the word 'ILLEGAL' in it. that means its 'ILLEGAL' for said person to be here. its people that are dissmissive of said 'inflamatory bollocks' who are really scary as they are avoiding the issue.