adios

How does it feel to take Mark seriously? I'm sure there must be something you can take for that. EDIT: Nice to see my quoting skills are in full working order... right so Mark's allowed to act like a cock but i'm supposed to take the rap for rising to it? Pretty much mate. You've either got it, or you don't. Didn't you just call yourself a cock?

How does it feel to take Mark seriously? I'm sure there must be something you can take for that. EDIT: Nice to see my quoting skills are in full working order... right so Mark's allowed to act like a cock but i'm supposed to take the rap for rising to it? How does it feel to take everyone so seriously?

Lies! AND too slow. EDIT: Jesus Wept...

How does it feel to take Mark seriously? I'm sure there must be something you can take for that. EDIT: Nice to see my quoting skills are in full working order...

Who, Gemmill? That ship has sailed tbh.

So what's the craic with this bloke; proper cunt or misunderstood genius? Can't be arsed to trawl through the 300 odd posts he's made in the last 15 days...

We won't be mentioning that word again today. I really need a new avatar, can't be arsed thinking of one...

Glad to see I've been missed, like. Who the fuck are all these people?

I stand corrected, 120 is the mark for severe mental retardation.

Look behind you.

The truth is, the questions in this test are too easy, a person with a normal education from a developed country would have to be severely mentally retarded to get 100 on that test, which kind of defeats the purpose of it. Having said that, they are standard questions, and this thing would have as much merit as a standard IQ test under exam conditions, if the questions went up in complexity towards the end and were weighted right. It's also impossible to score over 144, making it even more invalid. Almost as invalid as a real IQ score...

Better

Not even with a body of water between us tbh.

I was tempted to make another slight alteration to that, but I really didn't have the nerve.

Right, this is a serious question. Did I see a different version of this film to everyone else? Can someone give me a brief rundown of all the sex in it? Anyway, all of it was there for a reason, not a thing I saw was gratuitous (yes, inlcuding some pretty extreme violence). PS HF - answer my PM, please. I just edited Brock's post tbh. There wasn't enough to satisfy Jimbo, but there was as much as you'd expect in a film about some lads on a trip to get as much hole as they can. PS - I did but my PC froze, wasn't sure if it was succesful or not. My answer was...I agree with you, though I don't recall where it was pertinent. I'll stick it here, don't highlight this area if you're intereted in doing the IQ test: --> Odd one out. Circle, square, rectangle, iscoseles triangle, equilateral triangle. I said the iscosceles because all the others had equal angles contained within. They say circle as it has no straight lines around it's perimeter. Unless the circle is infinite of course, but I guess they didn't think of that... <--

If you hadn't sheltered her with c*nts upon cnuts, she'd have been prepared when she went out into the real world, and we'd never be in this mess in the first place!

Right, this is a serious question. Did I see a different version of this film to everyone else? Can someone give me a brief rundown of all the sex in it? Anyway, all of it was there for a reason, not a thing I saw was gratuitous (yes, inlcuding some pretty extreme violence). PS HF - answer my PM, please.

Oh my God! We killed catmag.

Hostel was just an excuse to cram as much sex and gore into a film to see what they could get away with before the MPAA stepped in, whilst at least Saw 2 had a reasonable plot, and was Darren Bousman's directing debut. In light of that last fact, some discrepencies can be overlooked (like they got Adam's chain on the wrong foot ). It's not a perfect film, but as a fan of the franchise I enjoyed it. Hostel, as a film is average at best. You completely missed the point, this is not surprising. Go back to your believable plot lines of Saw. I find you far more offensive than the reality of a lads' weekend in Amsterdam. Go figure.

Apoplectic, hissing at the screen tbh. When the mods see fit to change your screenname to cuntmag, I promise to never use the term on here again. I reckon it's a term of affection, anyway.

Brock, you rate Saw II, but didn't rate Hostel. This is not about opinions, you are mentally retarded. FACT!

I think if you had used it to take advantage of her, you would be, which is what we're talking about here. Mind, I don't see how it's much of an argument, as we could both define 'cunt' pretty differently. I think we're all cunts for various reasons, and I'm particularly bad (probably a fetid one tbh) in many ways, but not this one. I see catmag lurking, I'd say she's having a field day!

How many years of University did that staggering observation take? I was more talking about taking unfair advantage of someone once you know you have something over them. I wouldn't do it, or rather if I did, it would make me a cunt.

Kind of suggests you think all women are cunts tbh.

I managed to get a hold of the answers, if anyone's interested, PM me. Pud, congrats, you got every question right. As far as I'm concerned, so did I. I can see why their answer is correct, but so is mine. I hereby upgrade myself to 144. Any mathematicians want to PM me so I can run the question by them? I don't want to post it on here and ruin it for others. This test's a load of bollocks btw, great way to pass time before the footie, though..