Jump to content

Andrew

Admin
  • Posts

    22741
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by Andrew

  1. said hes in to stabilise the club then sell in summer, wonder how much he got it for 'cause they look destined for the drop to me, no transfer window between now and then for him to invest in
  2. hindsight and all that, it looked like the perfect thing at the time
  3. whats your source attain? or were you just throwing a name out at random?
  4. apart from that its fuck ugly I dont approve of CCC patches on that last one
  5. like both of those first ones there craig, and the Juve one
  6. You never know, having 2 actual wingers could make a bit of difference
  7. you rather have out of position guthrie rather than jonas?
  8. hope you're right about the midfield tbh
  9. rooney isnt as mental as he used to be though, could be the next step in his evolution as a player
  10. gerrard who beats people up in bars when they dont put his music on? probably my own dislike for him coming in there mind
  11. ban him for 10 games for wasting time trying to play the system the evidence against him is just so blatant, whats he trying to achieve?
  12. nufc.com said it was around 500k i can't imagine fat mike splashing that kind of cash on our 3rd chioice striker target could be similar to the three mil quooted for routledge which seemed to involve his wages for the contract too
  13. I agree with DS there tbh but to a further degree, the england captaincy doesn't end when you leave the stadium, you're a representative of the country, its our sport, its the worlds sport and you've got to be absolutely squeaky clean to have the captaincy IMO (which drops JT out right away as well as a few others) or at least have left your controversy quite a long way in the past.
  14. thats desperation for you failed on three other striker targets
  15. who would you take as our second LB if not bridge?
  16. rather see carroll trot off tbh
  17. all things considered, pleasantly surprised but its still not enough frankly
  18. he is good, when were we going to sign him?
  19. was about to post "good" since hes probably their best player but they aren't really our concern anymore they're 19 point behind us now, that shocked me quite a bit when I realised
  20. well he is only 23, theoretically we have him under contract for his best years and I cant imagine his agent would have accepted anything much shorter
  21. so do I, in fact nothing would please me more than for us to have signed a player whos never been particularly good for a small amount of money and watch him become amazing under our managers guidance but he wont
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.