Andrew

Right, lets try one more time to see if the penny drops Danny... On the very day that each of those Wiki edits were made, you were posting on this forum using the very same IP address. Clear enough for you liar? the sheer level of dannys delusion regarding this matter is getting a bit worrying, might be best to let his employers know for his own safety and that of those around him hes convinced that you and parky have admitted to making this up hes sure that the majority on here support him and think hes right despite no evidence of the first and massive evidence to the contrary on the second

that didn't last very long did it

fancy finding a neutral pub! nah, I'm utterly pennyless at the moment since I'm also going to wembley on monday

starting out on my settee, possibly ending inside my settee depending on how it goes

If it had an IP address anyway. or Wikipedia access

aye danny, quite a blow to your ego I'm sure but not all arguments on the internet revolve around how much of a cock you are

so you'll start beating her rather than selfharming?

I like it For god's sake lets not get complacent on account of this like we did against Fulham. Even without the Youngs, they've got more than enough talent to give us an absolute hiding! We need to go into this one like we did against Boro. At them from the very start but not run out of steam like we've done in other matches of late. ok so I'm not allowed to be annoyed at the prospect of united and chelsea fielding weakened teams, nor am I allowed to be enthused by some good news regarding our opponents anything else craig?

I like it

well so have hull and sunderland, but we've played man u and chelsea mid season when they we're both still playing for the league and earned the 2 draws we've had against them if hull and sunderland pick up points against those 2 with weakened sides then it is genuinely not fair considering how much is at stake, we aren't talking a mid table place and a difference of 1000000 prize money or whatever Aye but we've thrown away games we should have won. As Alex said elsewhere, it's swings and roundabouts and tough shit and if it were happening to any other club than Newcastle you wouldn't blink an eyelid. as opposed to hull and sunderland who haven't? every club in the relegation mire should have won some games they didn't so my paying attention to it (or not) defines whether it is unfair or not? Aye and there's as much chance that they'll go down as there is us. Tell me this, if we win, Hull win and Sunderland lose, will you be championing the Mackems' cause? Why not argue that Liverpool didn't 'turn up' at the Riverside yet they tore us apart at SJP? well that all depends on what sort of side chelsea play, if it is obviously a weakened one then they shoud have as much chance as hull and a better one than we do against a villa still fighting for something if, however, chelsea go full strength and man u dont then it wouuld be as much an injustice for them as it would for us In you mind perhaps but would you shout and holler about it or would you shrug and say tough shit? We're in this mess because we've been garbage - if we get relegated, it's no one elses fault but our own. We've been well aware for quite some time what the fixtures have been. If we go down, it'll be deserved and to try suing another club because of it would be, petty, pathetic, ridiculous and for once, deserving of all the ridicule that we'd be offered. as markT said that is such a shit argument, honestly might as well ask you how often you go on mackem matches But it isn't a shit argument and it's totally valid. By your response, you're saying it's only an issue because it effects us. Likewise, If SAF plays his kids on Saturday and they thrash Hull, you'll say nothing about it. You need to accept that if we go down, it's because of 3,420 minutes of football, not just the last 90. No I'm saying I only care because it affects us since I am a newcastle fan it wouldnt be anyless bullshit if it was happening to someone else I just wouldn't be that bothered because I dont support anyone else and of course I won't complain if uniteds kids murder hull, why would I? that would be the likely outcome if the first team played them I'm well aware that if we go down its our fault that still doesnt make the fact that man u can play nobodies in such a monumental game less bollocks from a "fairplay showing respect to the importance of the fixtures/league" point of view

yep, this is a pontless argument in the end since there would be no consequences for the team putting out a weakend side this "rule" is only their so the FA or premier league or whoever can claim they have a rule in place to stop this sort of action

well so have hull and sunderland, but we've played man u and chelsea mid season when they we're both still playing for the league and earned the 2 draws we've had against them if hull and sunderland pick up points against those 2 with weakened sides then it is genuinely not fair considering how much is at stake, we aren't talking a mid table place and a difference of 1000000 prize money or whatever Aye but we've thrown away games we should have won. As Alex said elsewhere, it's swings and roundabouts and tough shit and if it were happening to any other club than Newcastle you wouldn't blink an eyelid. as opposed to hull and sunderland who haven't? every club in the relegation mire should have won some games they didn't so my paying attention to it (or not) defines whether it is unfair or not? Aye and there's as much chance that they'll go down as there is us. Tell me this, if we win, Hull win and Sunderland lose, will you be championing the Mackems' cause? Why not argue that Liverpool didn't 'turn up' at the Riverside yet they tore us apart at SJP? well that all depends on what sort of side chelsea play, if it is obviously a weakened one then they shoud have as much chance as hull and a better one than we do against a villa still fighting for something if, however, chelsea go full strength and man u dont then it wouuld be as much an injustice for them as it would for us In you mind perhaps but would you shout and holler about it or would you shrug and say tough shit? We're in this mess because we've been garbage - if we get relegated, it's no one elses fault but our own. We've been well aware for quite some time what the fixtures have been. If we go down, it'll be deserved and to try suing another club because of it would be, petty, pathetic, ridiculous and for once, deserving of all the ridicule that we'd be offered. as markT said that is such a shit argument, honestly might as well ask you how often you go on mackem matches

Quoted for truth. while hull and sunderland have looked like world beaters? I know we got ourselves into the position we are in but so have hull and sunderland and I just think its bullshit that both have potentially easy rides (certainly easier than we had against those 2 teams) at such an incredibly important stage of the season

well so have hull and sunderland, but we've played man u and chelsea mid season when they we're both still playing for the league and earned the 2 draws we've had against them if hull and sunderland pick up points against those 2 with weakened sides then it is genuinely not fair considering how much is at stake, we aren't talking a mid table place and a difference of 1000000 prize money or whatever Aye but we've thrown away games we should have won. As Alex said elsewhere, it's swings and roundabouts and tough shit and if it were happening to any other club than Newcastle you wouldn't blink an eyelid. as opposed to hull and sunderland who haven't? every club in the relegation mire should have won some games they didn't so my paying attention to it (or not) defines whether it is unfair or not? Aye and there's as much chance that they'll go down as there is us. Tell me this, if we win, Hull win and Sunderland lose, will you be championing the Mackems' cause? Why not argue that Liverpool didn't 'turn up' at the Riverside yet they tore us apart at SJP? well that all depends on what sort of side chelsea play, if it is obviously a weakened one then they shoud have as much chance as hull and a better one than we do against a villa still fighting for something if, however, chelsea go full strength and man u dont then it wouuld be as much an injustice for them as it would for us as for boro liverpool, pool were still chasing the league then, it mattered to them and, looking at the side they put out, they weren't fielding a load of reserves Villa have nowt to play for either tbf and may not be trying their hardest. It's just the luck of the draw in the end. true enough but at the same time, they can still get 5th and have no "more important" matches over the horizon

agreed

its been done

well so have hull and sunderland, but we've played man u and chelsea mid season when they we're both still playing for the league and earned the 2 draws we've had against them if hull and sunderland pick up points against those 2 with weakened sides then it is genuinely not fair considering how much is at stake, we aren't talking a mid table place and a difference of 1000000 prize money or whatever Aye but we've thrown away games we should have won. As Alex said elsewhere, it's swings and roundabouts and tough shit and if it were happening to any other club than Newcastle you wouldn't blink an eyelid. as opposed to hull and sunderland who haven't? every club in the relegation mire should have won some games they didn't so my paying attention to it (or not) defines whether it is unfair or not? Aye and there's as much chance that they'll go down as there is us. Tell me this, if we win, Hull win and Sunderland lose, will you be championing the Mackems' cause? Why not argue that Liverpool didn't 'turn up' at the Riverside yet they tore us apart at SJP? well that all depends on what sort of side chelsea play, if it is obviously a weakened one then they shoud have as much chance as hull and a better one than we do against a villa still fighting for something if, however, chelsea go full strength and man u dont then it wouuld be as much an injustice for them as it would for us as for boro liverpool, pool were still chasing the league then, it mattered to them and, looking at the side they put out, they weren't fielding a load of reserves

well so have hull and sunderland, but we've played man u and chelsea mid season when they we're both still playing for the league and earned the 2 draws we've had against them if hull and sunderland pick up points against those 2 with weakened sides then it is genuinely not fair considering how much is at stake, we aren't talking a mid table place and a difference of 1000000 prize money or whatever Aye but we've thrown away games we should have won. As Alex said elsewhere, it's swings and roundabouts and tough shit and if it were happening to any other club than Newcastle you wouldn't blink an eyelid. as opposed to hull and sunderland who haven't? every club in the relegation mire should have won some games they didn't so my paying attention to it (or not) defines whether it is unfair or not?

well so have hull and sunderland, but we've played man u and chelsea mid season when they we're both still playing for the league and earned the 2 draws we've had against them if hull and sunderland pick up points against those 2 with weakened sides then it is genuinely not fair considering how much is at stake, we aren't talking a mid table place and a difference of 1000000 prize money or whatever

our saving grace for this weekend IMO as long as we can get something from villa which I truly believe we can Anelka 18 league goals scored Ronaldo 18 league goals scored

that if you are consistently an utter cunt then there may be real world consequences? no bad thing IMO

I wonder if you can pursue an appeal through other legal means? If both us and Hull lose on Sunday then there is an arguement that says we get relegated because of that decision. Can you imagine in your job if you got something wrong that ended up costing someone 50 million pounds? Howay man, we're not Sheffield United. If we get relegated on Sunday it'll be because we've been shite over 38 games - NOT because of one refereeing decision. There'll be as many decisions unfairly gone our way as there is go against us over the course of the season. Next you'll be wanting to take SAF to court for fielding his kids against Hull. It's not his fault which clubs are in the positions they're in... that said he should have to field a resonable strength team IMO it shows a big flaw in the league system when there is a game as important as this to 3 clubs and so many many people and the opposition could just field some kids, no first teamers jut to save them for another competition when us and the mackems (who are in a similar position to hull with chelsea playing in the fa cup final soon) have had to play man u at their devastating best and earn what little we got from them

I wonder if you can pursue an appeal through other legal means? If both us and Hull lose on Sunday then there is an arguement that says we get relegated because of that decision. Can you imagine in your job if you got something wrong that ended up costing someone 50 million pounds? easy argument "one decision does not make a season" that and government/legal bodies are always reluctant to interfere with sports that have there own governing bodies to deal with things like this so basically don't kid yourself no one is coming to our magical rescue, we must do the business on sunday

tbf with the exception of the panel and the turnover collar, it's exactly the same template as ours.... badge placement besides they are the things I don't like about our newest shirt so there you go

Not shitting it, I just take my job pretty seriously. is that why you spend hours on here making thousands of posts from your desk?