gram

Any of the following: Pint of guinness with a couple of whiskies hoyed in Whisky with nowt else. Baileys and Jameson is very good Tequila slammers (never right to just have one) Margharita Mojita

No Love Lost - The Rifles

Saw Kasabian once supporting The Who and they were utter shite. Albums are alright

yeah - what was that about? Maybe he is right-footed actually. Or just really talented on both. Obviously i m not in his league but i am left footed and tend to take pens with right, no idea why. always take longer range stuff with left cos its stronger. always do keepy uppies on right as well but almost entirely left footed other than those two things.

Dropped some acid, was at home for the weekend. Stood on bed buck naked to turn telly over with raging hard on (which for some reason always with acid) Fatha walked in and said 'Alright son?' He looked at me and swiftly retreated and the matter hasnt come up in conversation since.

Ali

Dirty bitch.

Legend On the road is awesome too... Not as good as Big Sur tbh

I'd just like to point out, as I thought I had earlier, that the whole Enrique Iglesias thing was an in joke between the lass in question and myself. Had I put the effort in, I would have done more than pull a beanie hat over my massive fucking head. In hindsight, I shouldn't have posted that when I was drunk, but AT LEAST I didn't get up there and sing something by Bowling For Soup. At any point in the evening did she say "Brock, the joke's gone too far."? I'm thinking specifically of the exact moment when you dragged her up on stage to serenade her with one of his songs, you pillock! It fucking worked though! Must've been the latin touch. the end justifies the means.

Got a 70s fancy dress thing on Sat in Nottingham at this lasses 30th birthday party. Should be good. Never watch telly really so my advice is get yourselves out and hunt down some flange

Lad I knew well at school did it. I got to know his friend at college and he hoyed himself in front of a train. Another mate tried it once in my house and bled on my record collection the cock. Another mate tries it occasionally and fails every time happily. Never thought about it meself though

Barnsley lasses (and lads for that matter) matey! I live there and they do talk a totally different language to the rest of society never mind Yorkshire.

In bed with one two weeks ago and managed to get her to wear my Newcastle strip, just about to get first shag with her and cos i called her her best friends name she got a monk on! I shagged her friend but she has monk on with me for time with other one. Tonight went out with another lass and she wants long term committment. Only known her 3 days Jesus, why cant they just do things normally? are you Brock in disguise ??? ( not as Enrique mind ) they are round the bend. One simple slip of the tongue....

In bed with one two weeks ago and managed to get her to wear my Newcastle strip, just about to get first shag with her and cos i called her her best friends name she got a monk on! I shagged her friend but she has monk on with me for time with other one. Tonight went out with another lass and she wants long term committment. Only known her 3 days Jesus, why cant they just do things normally? ... monk on? am I alone in thinking I live in yorkshire now, its the phrase they use before you start that shit.

In bed with one two weeks ago and managed to get her to wear my Newcastle strip, just about to get first shag with her and cos i called her her best friends name she got a monk on! I shagged her friend but she has monk on with me for time with other one. Tonight went out with another lass and she wants long term committment. Only known her 3 days Jesus, why cant they just do things normally?

Do my head in.

Will sound good with a Tele through it. Get yourself a tubescreamer and you're set.

You like women who look like that

Ordinary boys album. Tis very good. Also decided to dig out Futureheads albums cos I got some tickets to see that at Sheffield Leadmill on Monday. Still listening to the Rifles album which has been my favourite so far of 2006.

Leazes alter-ago is fantastic over there. Martins will be a great player, he always said Dyer was the answer etc etc after yesterdays performance.... Wonder how long before he reminds us that he always said Shepherd was never the man to be in charge of NUFC....

Yep thats the one for me. He knobbed one in a few weeks earlier that was pretty important. Dont see many goals knobbed in by the likes of Bergkamp or Henry do you??? Best goal I saw was Gazzas against Chelsea. I was sat in the makeshift seats in the Leazes for some reason that day.

Heavens above. Fancy having ambition If only there was an attendance of greater than 1 person prior to 1992 we might not be in this predicament. Apparently I, nor the others were there

daft comment, not true and only said by bairns I'm afraid You might think it's daft Leazes, but factually it's correct. People are laughing at the piss poor way this club is being run. It's even gone so far that I hear people say they feel sorry for the Newcastle fans, not because of the years without silverware, but for the pathetic displays both on and off the pitch which the input that our fans give is deserving of so much more. We're an absolute joke at the moment and no wave of a magic wand by the fat fairy is going to turn it all around. Until the upper levels of management are re-planted, we're never going to get of this slippery slope. At the present moment, the Championship beckons, even more so than it did under Souness IMO. well I am not living in Newcastle just now either, and I haven't heard anyone making a joke of the club. There are plenty of people taking the piss out of Leeds, the mackems, West Ham, Liverpool, Manure whenever they lose, Man City [and Stuart Pearce who you thought was improving them] to name a few....and other clubs such as Sheff Wed when people even remember they exist.....speaking of which I remember when we were a joke just like them which is when we were in a state like that ourselves for quite a long time. Especially when we sold our trophy players ie England players and replaced them with tripe and has beens and ordinary players. Pre - 1992 of course, until this board stepped in and showed new ambitions for the club. Either way, I suggest you stop being so sensitive. It sounds like they just know they are winding you up, I can't imagine how you would take it if we were shit. Never mind, next week you can remind them how envious they will be when we are playing in europe - again, and they presumably are not. And - our current situation is exactly what myself and one or two others told you and some others on here would be the legacy of Souness, but you carried on saying we should back him with unlimited funds regardless. So - having forgotten you did all of that, I think you should cast your mind back....and having backed it, why are you moaning. Wasnt it the chairman rather than the people on this board who backed Souness financially? Lets face it I cant imagine anyone on here being daft enough to hoy £50m at someone like him. The other fella should have known better though. Why should he ? He's got his views like anyone. If people think he should have backed Souness and think he is thick, then they must be just as thick for agreeing with him . You understand my point perfectly. They backed Souness spending spree, so they have zero grounds for moaning now. This is the position which some people forecast we would be in, to the letter, and it was obvious Why should he have known better? Cos every man and his dog knew Souness was never going to succeed. Even those who backed him were well aware of his limitations. The one man who shouldnt have given him that opportunity in the first place never mind back him with that kind of cash is the Chairman. Its his job. Its not the responsibility of lads on a message board. Whether they are thick or not isnt of any concern. The buck stopped with one man and as you were aware of the potential legacy of Souness, how come the chairman wasnt? Not content with that fuck up he appoints another plank afterwards. Can he justify either appointment in your view? Can he justify providing these men with funds when we all know that they arent the answer long term or short term? Every man and their dogs didn't, or they would not have backed him selling our best players and spending a fortune on crap replacements and other players too. You are still completely unable to understand that while we all want to be number 1, regularly playing in europe, and buying England players is a degree of success and not failure. You don;t do this by doing everything wrong no matter your resources and if you still don't understand that look around at other big clubs and our own history when we had shit directors. Please explain what grounds you have for thinking replacing the current board with small time directors with zero ambition that don't attempt to tap their resources like other clubs is impossible ? I was aware of how shit Souness was, so maybe they should make me chairman, or manager... I wouldn't make Craig, or Gemmill though, because as well as backing Souness they also thought we would be better off without Bellamy ....enough said. I have never defended Shepherd for appointing Souness, I don't know what your old username was but if you were here on this board at the time you will know I was one of the ones who opposed him the most. And BTW - at the time, appointing Dalglish, Gullit and Robson were top rated appointments, with completely justifiable reasons for appointing them. How many shit clubs with shit boards attract managers like that. So you think Shepherd is guilty of mismanagement? I mean by giving Souness £50m quid? Heavens I think youre tying yourself in knots here mister Nb: Gullit never has been and never will be a top rated manager. The same was\is true of Souness and Roeder. Thus 3 of the 5 Mr Shepherd has appointed have been substandard prior to their appointment. Not good enough. Well not for me anyway. Like I say though, if youre happy with the way the last few seasons have been managed then that in itself tells me more than I need to know. Comparing them to 1978-1982 is just daft so please don't. Its a silly comparison.

daft comment, not true and only said by bairns I'm afraid You might think it's daft Leazes, but factually it's correct. People are laughing at the piss poor way this club is being run. It's even gone so far that I hear people say they feel sorry for the Newcastle fans, not because of the years without silverware, but for the pathetic displays both on and off the pitch which the input that our fans give is deserving of so much more. We're an absolute joke at the moment and no wave of a magic wand by the fat fairy is going to turn it all around. Until the upper levels of management are re-planted, we're never going to get of this slippery slope. At the present moment, the Championship beckons, even more so than it did under Souness IMO. well I am not living in Newcastle just now either, and I haven't heard anyone making a joke of the club. There are plenty of people taking the piss out of Leeds, the mackems, West Ham, Liverpool, Manure whenever they lose, Man City [and Stuart Pearce who you thought was improving them] to name a few....and other clubs such as Sheff Wed when people even remember they exist.....speaking of which I remember when we were a joke just like them which is when we were in a state like that ourselves for quite a long time. Especially when we sold our trophy players ie England players and replaced them with tripe and has beens and ordinary players. Pre - 1992 of course, until this board stepped in and showed new ambitions for the club. Either way, I suggest you stop being so sensitive. It sounds like they just know they are winding you up, I can't imagine how you would take it if we were shit. Never mind, next week you can remind them how envious they will be when we are playing in europe - again, and they presumably are not. And - our current situation is exactly what myself and one or two others told you and some others on here would be the legacy of Souness, but you carried on saying we should back him with unlimited funds regardless. So - having forgotten you did all of that, I think you should cast your mind back....and having backed it, why are you moaning. Wasnt it the chairman rather than the people on this board who backed Souness financially? Lets face it I cant imagine anyone on here being daft enough to hoy £50m at someone like him. The other fella should have known better though. Why should he ? He's got his views like anyone. If people think he should have backed Souness and think he is thick, then they must be just as thick for agreeing with him . You understand my point perfectly. They backed Souness spending spree, so they have zero grounds for moaning now. This is the position which some people forecast we would be in, to the letter, and it was obvious Why should he have known better? Cos every man and his dog knew Souness was never going to succeed. Even those who backed him were well aware of his limitations. The one man who shouldnt have given him that opportunity in the first place never mind back him with that kind of cash is the Chairman. Its his job. Its not the responsibility of lads on a message board. Whether they are thick or not isnt of any concern. The buck stopped with one man and as you were aware of the potential legacy of Souness, how come the chairman wasnt? Not content with that fuck up he appoints another plank afterwards. Can he justify either appointment in your view? Can he justify providing these men with funds when we all know that they arent the answer long term or short term?