manc-mag

He obviously knew there were going to be fellows of the Royal Aeronautical Society posting on here and wanted to do things right. Practically Royalty tbh.

"Have you tried unplugging the monitor?"

I doubt either of them are fully trained tbh.

Let me rightly understand you. Are you suggesting there might be any nurses uniform Gemmill might look good in?

He's on a fucking hiding to nothing then tbh.

Right here son, but I'll be off soon to try out my new found games on her indoors. 86736[/snapback] Wacky's playing catcher the neet then, eh?

Picture of catmag in nurses uniform and high heeled boots stored in bank. 86728[/snapback] Trust me mate, it's not as nice as it sounds. 86731[/snapback] Vomitworthy factor exceeded only by the image of Gemmill in the same outfit tbh.

Pets-R-Us

A hamster would need four socks, shirley?

Danny Devito posts as Wacky Jnr I heard or alternatively read.

I dont think she posts on here tbh. 86701[/snapback] He'd have put "read" if she did, tbh 86704[/snapback] I'd imagine if she did her agent would read the posts out to her. Or something.

I dont think she posts on here tbh. 86701[/snapback] As Catmag 86703[/snapback] She statistically more likely to post as Catmag than to be burnt alive in a boeing 737 apparently.

I dont think she posts on here tbh.

I thought it was good tbh. 86686[/snapback] Subtle as a brick tbh. Dialogue was abysmal and it had Ludacris in it. 86689[/snapback] Definitely a bit heavy-handed like and Ludacris Not that surprised it got nominated though. It's no Spike Lee Joint like. 86693[/snapback] Correctomundo. Sandra Bullock would still have got it like, to be totally fair to her.

I thought it was good tbh. 86686[/snapback] Subtle as a brick tbh. Dialogue was abysmal and it had Ludacris in it.

Crash has been nominated for best picture? Jesusweptathon!

PART-TIMER TBH!!! 86675[/snapback] soopafan alert tbqf

not my pocket o' pennies like, but the guy who told me, said (and I swear) "No, no mate, some girls like that shit" .... I just don't get how it's.... arousing... 86677[/snapback] Thats blatantly a heap of shite like! Were you speaking to him behind a glass screen?

Barely constitute 'sexual practices' like do they? More like GBH.

Isolated bender on this board. 86616[/snapback] Discrimination against peach melba slurpers tbh. 86619[/snapback] Fair slander of the weakest race on the planet tbqh! 86621[/snapback] Disgraceful slur on most of the House of Commons tbqfh. 86622[/snapback] It sits quite comfortably with most MP's gbh! 86634[/snapback] There's nothing comfortable about it if done incorrectly imho 86644[/snapback] He tried it once (through his shorts) but didnt like it. Was he doing it wrong? 86648[/snapback] I wasn't doing anything wrong! It's the lad with the shitty finger who wasn't up to scratch. 86652[/snapback] Typical of you to point the finger at others tbh.

Isolated bender on this board. 86616[/snapback] Discrimination against peach melba slurpers tbh. 86619[/snapback] Fair slander of the weakest race on the planet tbqh! 86621[/snapback] Disgraceful slur on most of the House of Commons tbqfh. 86622[/snapback] It sits quite comfortably with most MP's gbh! 86634[/snapback] There's nothing comfortable about it if done incorrectly imho 86644[/snapback] He tried it once (through his shorts) but didnt like it. Was he doing it wrong?

To be honest I can do without watching two men have sex in the back of a car.... And anyway - it's obviously a fake story. A bloke doing the shopping?! 86418[/snapback] I'm with you on this one Cat...... 86635[/snapback] Lesbians tbh 86639[/snapback] I believe that was the point....they were in the back of the car ??? 86642[/snapback] That was abundantly clear. Have I been double whooshed?

Not to mention your index finger.