Walliver

Wouldn't it be great to have a pornstar as a cleaner? Well, either they'd be good eye candy or would have great suction <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I can safely say she would be cleaning my pipes out on a daily basis. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> techically he never said a female pornstar. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ok you can have a man if you want none of my business. Anyone know Tianna Lynn's number? My bedroom's a mess like. This is almost available. http://www.nakedcleaners.co.uk/ (NSFW, for those who can't read)

When will people learn that threads like this need pictures?

Movember starts again today. I've signed up to do it this year - if any kindly souls feel like donating my page is here: https://www.movember.com/uk/donate/your-det...member_id/6930/ Anyone else doing it? I was a bit disappointed by the lack of pictures in this thread from the 2008 crew.

I got them all except . Seems to be the team most missed so far in the thread.

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/politics/pol...s-200910222159/

Clouds man Best post in this thread!

http://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-rele...y-fc-119648.php

Another video - if the translation thing at the end works at all well that's a pretty nifty feature.

Looks pretty cool. Like with Googlemail they're doing invite only for starters and I'm quite keen on getting involved. If anyone has a spare invite I'd be very appreciative if you could send it my way.

Can someone give Besty some sort of award? His comment lit up this thread. Maybe someone knows someone who cuts the hair of the neighbour of someone who knows Lily? Have a word. That would be an appropriate prize.

I love TED, there's some really cool stuff on there. There's one video I think I've linked to before about 'mathemagic'. It's really cool in a really geeky way. http://www.ted.com/talks/arthur_benjamin_d...mathemagic.html

Ah, he's a selfless warrior!

You couldnt handle what I'd want to say you would probably faint or just spontaneously combust. Howay CT, don't give us that shit, tell us what you really want to say, I dare you. Not in front of kiddies. So you want a thread to say what you want but won't say anything in it? And you're not following your own advice. No one has tried to censor you in this thread, in fact people are trying to get more out of you but you're unwilling to comment.

As there seems to be quite a bit of confusion over the point of this thread, CT, could you clarify it? Maybe define more clearly what you mean by free speech as there seems to be a few different definitions flying around.

There's a good bit in Malcolm Gladwell's The Tipping Point about the simple steps they took in New York that had a huge effect on the crime rate.

Now you're preventing the PC brigade asking their questions and thus crushing their right to free speech.

To me this reads like someone slagged off Stevie's profession, Stevie got annoyed, Fish made a period joke, Stevie decided to ignore everything Fish said afterwards and just slag him off. Close?

This all seems a tad ridiculous.

Rather that than someone whose comments go through a PR person or three for sign off before you hear/read them. Another thing I think people overlook is that often she won't just come out with these statements, but she's obviously going to be doing a tour of PR work before singles/albums and journalists will ask her what she thinks of so-and-so. If she said something like 'I don't really want to speak about them' she'd be as dull as the rest of them.

http://sugababes.com/home.php So Sugababes now have no original members in their line up and my dream can finally come true: Keisha, Mutya and Siobhan start a band together and call themselves Sugababes. Chart mayhem.

From the Mail:

What else were you going to do with that hour?

But, actually, he's acting like an idiot. No matter what happened at Arsenal, no matter what he thought of RvP, that is unacceptable.

He fixed the Lottery

Here's the points system (from wiki - just checked): Durham only need 11 points to secure victory in the county championship and they've already got 4 batting points. A draw will give them 4 more. It's done and dusted basically barring an incredible turn around as they'll get one more batting point in this innings plus the odd bowling point and batting points in their 2nd innings if they bat again. 5Live reckoned they didn't need any more points but it would appear you're right and they need 2 bowling points (as at least a draw is nailed on). Bonus points only apply to the first innings. Looks like they're likely to get the full five for batting (a 314 opening partnership will often do that for you) and I doubt they'll get fewer than six wickets with GBH and Plunkett playing. I reckon they'll win this quite comfortably so bonus points shouldn't be of too much importance.