The Fish

Free text fields? Fuck that, I'm out.

Not the Barbour, not the gilet, the "going out jacket".

Questions like "When's tea ready?" "Have you seen my going out jacket?" "Why are the kids crying?" "The house is a state, what have you been doing all day?"

I couldn't name a player in their first team, let alone one from their women's team.

And get exercise going downstairs when, if he continues to ignore her, his mamster* will acquiesce and bring it to his room? My best guess is that's unconscionable *Mam/sister.

My best guess is that chunksafc is grossly overweight, whose fantasies aren't just restricted to unlikely scenarios where Newcastle United are somehow moved US franchise style 3,000 miles away to an entirely different continent, to play in an ersatz Super League. My best guess is that he believes that lasses would be all over him if they realised what a nice guy he was. My best guess is that these fantasies give him comfort as he stares out the box room window ignoring his mam's calls to a tea of microwaved chicken dippers and cheesy chips. But that's just my best guess.

Cameroon created one or two decent chances (1 in each half) and small poor chances, whereas Switzerland created 4-5 good chances (1 in first and 3-4 in the second). So, I'm not sure this is the gotcha you think it is? Even your initial post doesn't make a whole heap of sense. "Wow Cameroon creating some serious xG here" No, they weren't. Last round of games in the PL, the average xG for the winning side was 2.21, average for the losing side 1.08. "sucker punch incoming" Is it a sucker punch when the puncher has made better chances than the punchee? It's fine though, I'll drop this now and let you luddites labour away in your ignorance.

That is the only thing you've got right so far. But rather than mock you for it, I'm just glad you're making some progress.

Yeah, you don't seem to fully understand it. xG isn't a measure of a player's ability at all. All xG shows is; given all the variables, how likely a goal is to be scored from a given chance. Based on thousands and thousands of data points across multiple leagues. Doesn't matter the player, or the team he's in or whatever. High xG doesn't necessarily = good player. Also, your eyes lie to you, all the time.

Is it the public urination problem?

Your face is nonsense.

This shit right here is why you're the talk of the office canteen.

Pretty sure that if they're all logged into the same account that is trying to buy a ticket, that's all that she wrote. Doesn't matter if they're different devices, providers, Hell it wouldn't matter if you gave your details to a mate in Nantucket, it's the account that's the unique variable they're looking for. If there are multiple instances of that account logged in and active, it'll flag as a problem.

No, but seriously; What do you think xG is trying to show? Like if you were objectively explaining xG's function, it's intended purpose, what would you say? Because, despite hours and hours, pages and pages, I don't think you know what it is.

Lector? He hardly knew her.

Lol-ed at the gif, not the 'joke'.

No. It'd be really weird if Oliver Holt's mam bought Phil Foden's mam a house.

Round here? Nah, this bubble is impregnable.

He bought his mam a house in my village.

And I was talking about other people on the piss-ups.

Really? Next time I go, I'll wear a Newcastle Shirt to try and lure him out.

Bullshit, I've seen you on Toontastic piss ups.

What odds that we make a bid for Al-Dawsari in January?