ChezGiven

I can take almost anything but the comment about Brussels is under the belt

The last PSG game i was at we were smoking in the stands. Not meant to but nae one gave a fuck.

I like it.

Fnarr.

Aye cheers Barney.

Are you making a special appearance on Countdown?

Winner also gets to wear the disguise we've knocked up for getting in the home end in Bruges as the prize. Speaking of which ....

Why the fuck would you want to send text messages from a fucking laptop? What is wrong with you? I'm beginning to wish you got an Android now.

No shift in any goal posts at all. I didnt base my point on Man U's commercial interests being on a different planet, i based it on AON remaining a key commercial partner therefore explaining why no care was taken to announce the end of AON as there was no end of AON. Me commenting that how Man U do business is perhaps also exceptional refers to the power they have over the sponsors. I think i covered the 'we act just like all the other bigger clubs' with detailed examples of Arsenal and Chelsea. Now your Man U example doesnt really hold up either. In all seriousness, i'd be surprised if it is SD. Why would they want to pay for space on the shirts when the fuckers get adequate coverage already for nothing?

Except for thursday nights, when i sprinkled magic dust on those turntables.

Thought you'd like that. I was a student wanker at the time but i knew all the DJs in town. Highly embarrassing looking back

I was thinking that this morning after i was rude to him and he responded with respect. I find the frogs are wankers until you are wankers to them, then they respect you.

I used to DJ in Klute in Durham on a thursday night (), was a student acid-jazz night that was more Balearic Ibiza than Talking Loud records but was rammed every week. I got sacked because i had 'no chat on the mic'. The lad who wanted me sacked (head DJ, ex-bouncer) used to honestly go on like that. Main reason i was hoyed was that we used to rip the piss out of him. As the night was popular, he wanted to do the warm up and he played the same music as me but doing the same cheesy voiceover lines. Like Giles Peterson nowadays tbf.

I always give that a bit of leg room when approaching these things myself.

Pardew denied it at the presser. Cabaye said that "Spurs wanted him to replace Modric" to Canal +. As we know, the agents tell the players if another club is interested, so to be aware of their interest does not require us to give them permission to speak to them. Pardew said no bid for him was made, which suggested to me that they refused permission or did not accept a bid. Its funny how we come to different conclusions though

Also, have you factored in the fact that you're an idiot?

Try this link http://techpp.com/2012/03/24/dlna-streaming-apps-iphone/

The need to be an arsehole is the issue though. Well rounded, normal good natured people dont have that need. From what i have ascertained so far, i'd put the probability that a violent Uncle made you suck his cock when you were under-age as quite high. Ha ha, hard lines.

Would you have a lead for your tv control? Hello 1982. Apple TV is really good but you'd want an ipad with loads of vids and a massive itunes match account attached for it to be really worth it.

If the TV is not internet enabled, your blu-ray and should work that way.

Yes it did, as there is nothing unusual about what we are doing. What point are you trying to argue then, that we should announce the new sponsor before the deal is in place? We have 9 months to satisfy this, most clubs dont do all these things on the same day. There is plenty of scope to stagger these things, no reason to announce the new deal earlier than a few months before it comes into place though (not 9 months before) and nothing unusual about what we are doing. Had a look at the other example for you. Man U's commercial interests are on a different planet to ours, using brands with bigger global exposure but also driving a far more attractive option for new sponsors. Not sure how they behave is a model for us. When GM was announced as the new sponsor, AON announced the next day that they will continue to sponsor the Man U business network (there is therefore no need to separate the brands association with the club). They are all still partners, with one brand replacing another on the shirt but the rest, including DHL, all partnering with the club as official sponsors. So there is the specific issue which explains whatever was making you complain we weren't acting like Man U.

I'd be interested in seeing the proportion of NUFC fans married on a weekday versus the weekend with relation to fixtures etc. Obviously you'd want to track that relationship over time and compare to the team's success on the pitch. Congratulations! Assuming you make it through the day that is

Der is arnly wan ting CT wants dis season, mon.

It's funny that since you have been like this, people like you more

I thought it was that we should be announcing the new sponsor when we announce the end of the previous deal. Otherwise what could possibly be the bone of contention here? We've just announced the Virgin deal will end when the season is over. Chelsea announced the end of the emirates deal in September and Samsung deal the following April. As you would expect. As J69 reckons that's it's definitely not SD that would mean there is definitely not anything unusual about announcing these things at different times.