ChezGiven

Not sure what wolfy is, there are many shades of belief about 9/11 from the US government were guilty of incompetence, were complicit in their own incompetence, trained and allowed the pilots to implement their plan, flew the planes themselves etc. Then about 5000 light years more way out than the more extreme of those views, you've got wolfy.

So the fact that its exactly whats on that other forum is just a MASSIVE COINCIDENCE???? Oh yeah, thats what you want us to believe but come on! Thats just not believable, a whole forum with EXACTLY the same views? Thats just what you want us to believe.

Oh dear.

The footage on youtube seems comprehensive and fairly clear given the circumstances. Because i havent got the time to discuss camera technologies and capturing the light emitted from an object moving at 700mph from 20 odd miles away i wont be proving anything to you. Common sense and basic understanding of the topic should means its not required though.

They were filming a man moving at 700mph from 22 miles away and because the picture was a bit grainy, its a fake Big post count on this topic Wolfy. One word, rattled.

There were cameras on him, there was a camera on the balloon and then there is a lot of air till we find the next camera which is either on earth or in a flying vehicle. So how far away was the nearest camera?

How far away was the camera Wolfy?

Just chicken stock, nothing else? Sounds nice that, will have to try it. I did Lentils last week, lardons, carrots and an onion pricked with a few cloves. Traditional.

Well here's one for the moral compass, lets hope it goes badly for Wonga, they see no noticeable increase in business segments where they expected to and in 3 years they fuck off. In the mean time, the people they were exploiting anyway have had their resources diverted to our club for a period of time. Whilst the happiness derived from the success a football club might gain is no recompense for the inequities of society, the diversion of such relatively small terms would never solve society's ills anyway. In the best case, it doesnt work out and the money made from the country's poor is at least in part diverted back into something the people of the region can appreciate. Of course on the other hand, if they do stick around it means we are helping exploit the poor.

The one with the monopoly. You dont get it by the way. Dont believe me? Read the article about the FTC and EU regulators then. Google has a monopoly on search and mapping through databases. They exploit the search monopoly by making sure that every time you put 'android versus iphone' into their engine, their pre-determined blog strategies are on page 1 (). The map database monopoly is probably not being exploited to fuck the consumer but was probably to fuck a competitor. This is ok but can be a red flag since fucking competitors always comes before fucking the consumer.

I'll tell you what. Get on the back of a pick up truck and tell the driver to fly down the road at just 90mph, then deploy a little drogue chute from your back pack and see what forces act on your body. How do seat belts work then?

What? Apple have a monopoly on Apple products? Bing's market share is what then? 30-50%? No.

How analytical of you Of course they both have to be, its not just them fighting it out. Google's aggressive monopolist behaviour is worse according to the FTC and EU regulators. No offence, but whether they strike you as different or the personality of Jobs comes over in a particular way is not exactly important to regulators. They have a monopoly on search and exploit it in anti-competitive ways to the detriment of competitors, this is fact. They also have, sorry had one on mapping on phones. This also seems to be going badly for the competitor who has pulled out of the market and gone their own way.

Of course it was, the aggressive monopolist was exploiting its market dominance.

I enjoy the real debate, the one that is discussed in the business pages. The online bitch fest is quite boring tbf. If you know the address, its fine. If you dont hav e the address and just the name then google's database of places is bigger and better but that really isnt a surprise and if you believe in Google's aggressiveness (which i do) then its easy to see how you end up with a poorer service than the monopolist.

If you want the link, google it. Oh, wait.

Why? its not that important really The maps app is much faster than the google app which suggests there is truth in the view that Apple were forced to remove google and replace it. Its not just Apple trying to stick it to Google, Google are an aggressive and dangerous company that fucks with what you think is open access to information. Whatever shite is written in this thread, in reality there is no moral high ground.

I did think of wor Wolfy when i saw this yesterday 'explain that then ye mentalist'.

I got to the bit where it said both systems are really good and the more apple products you've got the better it is, thenstopped reading. If I was a Luddite like Renton and owned a PC built in the last decade and didn't had an iPad, there's no doubt, I would not get an iPhone.

Stop going to seedy gay bars that aren't registered with the mapping companies then.

Ever wondered why when you search for articles you find more favourable reviews for android than IOS? Then have you wondered what search engine you are using and why the EU is about to come down on Google's arse harder than Microsoft? Only joking, sort of....

Put it in the Android thread

Just upgrade to os6, the maps app is now better Tried it to a friends house in a remote location in the Jura mountains, bookmarked a load of places. Seems great to me.

:lol: