wykikitoon

You think that with Abramovich's billions, Chelsea won't have their pick of top coaches? I think they will, but I don't think any of them will have the impact Mourinho has. Likewise with Man U. They can get in whoever they want, but even being half as successful as Ferguson is going to be a huge ask. Oh for sure they will have the pick, what I was saying is that despite the take over from Glazer, Man U still have a MASSIVE attraction. Ferguson and Mourhino like you say are one offs and I dont think Man Utd will ever replace Fergie at all. Mind you when we had the Cloughs, Revis, Shankleys etc were people having similar debates?

Arsenal are an awesome team and the management are great, its just Wenger that boils my piss with some of the things he says.

Man U can easily attract a top class manager IMO. They are one of 3 world class clubs in Britain with terms of world wide revenue. Man U, Liverpoo & Celtic IMO. Chelsea and Arsenal are not in that bracket IMO.

Man Ure wont get him until the summer anyway. Plus Man Ure dont pay the full whack upfront, its always in little trickles etc. Plus a few good games from Hargreaves and he is worth £20m? Feck off

Great point. Not one pundit has said, "well it happened against Newcastle on Wednesday so they deserve their bit of luck" or whatever. Exactly! Everyone hates and we dont care :blink:

Why hasnt that ref who let the Birmingham goal stand been sent down to the conferance?

I would be slightly sad if Jose leaves as he makes me laugh, but on the other hand he does boil my piss. It would be Awesome if Jose stays and Abramovich leaves though

Name the players we have sold that we didnt need to sell please and where the money has gone then? Bad management has bought players like Luque and Boumsong etc but with good management we can buy good players in the defence (Like we are all saying). Yes spending stupid money on crap players will not address it like you say. BUT the argument is dont sell Duff because we need him? Do we? IMO No, we dont need him, we however need competant defenders.

He may care, but that doesnt make him a good player. He was just starting to do basic things OK, not good, ok. Yeh fair enough some of the abuse maybe bad but its mainly down to his shite defending that we have let in 7 goals in 2 games!

Ooops /snigger

So we shouldn't sign players anymore because its not worth it? basically yes, we're shit, and it's not down to the current players Who the fuck is it down to then? Man you are one herion smacked up freak mate. the chairman and the management Arsene Wenger has no plans to spend anything in January, but by their standards they are doing shite at the moment any idea why that is? Oh silly me, no wonder we are shit when FFS runs up and down the pitch week in week out!! Arsenal are doing shit? Well maybe by past standards aye, but so are Chelsea, yet they are in 4 comps still, oh and so are Arsenal? Wenger doesnt need to spend at the moment, we do! No point in putting {irrelevant crap} shite anyway, I know I am right and most people do also who have read you pointless blinkerd utter fucking bollocks! We need to spend cash on the defence its quite utterly simple. If we can sell Duff to finance this well go for it! He isnt needed as much as defenders that is all I am saying. If on the other hand he was playing week in week out and playing well then I would say no, but thats all if's. If you had a brain I wouldnt be trying to explain to you this would I?

Radio 5 Live

That's still being investigated. Hmm is this why he is "injured" No.

That's still being investigated. Hmm is this why he is "injured"

Class Luke

Hehe I love the BBC text commentry 1749: Cristiano Ronaldo gets a great standing ovation from the home fans as he comes off to be replaced by Gabriel Heinze. Actually, that's a lie. The Portugal winger is booed off, as expected.

2-1 to the Arse

Well done Hatton. Barton was on Soccer AM yesterday, said Hatton goes down to the training ground a lot but they wont let him join in incase he chins em hehe

1-1 Van Persie

So we shouldn't sign players anymore because its not worth it? basically yes, we're shit, and it's not down to the current players Who the fuck is it down to then? Man you are one herion smacked up freak mate.

Yes, its due to us not buying well. Your saying keep hold of Duff because we need cover, fair enough. Ask yourself, how badly have we missed him compared to us missing Given? Not a lot at all. Duff, like has been said isnt needed if £7m is on the table, if £7m isnt on the table then keep him? We need the money to buy players in key positions.

I think its you who isnt getting it mate. Duff isnt needed IMO as we have adequate cover. We could use the money which is a lot for someone who, like I say has been ineffective and injured a lot this season, on bolstering our defence. Not to mention what Duff will be on wages etc, surley it makes business sense to make a profit and at the end of the day,that is what NUFC are. We seriousley need to sort our defence out and using the Duff money wisely by Roeder then we can start to plug the MASSIVE void that we have been crying out for, for many, many seasons and start thinking bout FA & League cups?

A Young lad who has a lot of football ahead of him and Duff? Doesnt make good buiness sense, well unless £15m comes in for him. Zog doesn't have the right attitude IMO. Always mortal on a Saturday night. Allegedly

I know what you mean about having a limited squad. I would like to see him stay and play well, but tbh I had forgotten about him until the other day when the BBC showed a side with the crocks missing. If we can get £7m for him, IMO we should get rid and put the money to use in much needed areas. and what exactly are those areas? positions where in the past we had perfectly fucking adequate players until they were sold for a bastard pittance seriously? no one sees a link between this revolving door policy and our shit squad profile? Left back, Right back and Centre backs Havent you seen our defence recently? "Fucking adequate players?" Like whom in our defence has been adequate since Woody? Would even argue Woodgate wasn't adequate, more than enough quality but we couldn't afford to keep a defender who played so little. Aye but when he did play he was more than adequate, I for one was with FFS on the selling of him at the pricee when it came in because of his horendous (sp) injuries so now he's playing in the Premiership and we have Ramage would he even have reached the end of his contract with us by now? Who knows really. We got a good price for a crock and we didnt use the money wisely to strength then a still poor defence. We now have a possible opportunity to make money on a player (which doenst happen a lot nowadays) that has been injured and ineffective for a lot of the season. So IMO we sell him and use the money wisely in shring up a shocking and possibley the worse defence in the top flight! But then again according to you we need cover in the midfield more

A Young lad who has a lot of football ahead of him and Duff? Doesnt make good buiness sense, well unless £15m comes in for him.