Kevin Carr's Gloves

You need to copy and paste better.

How do you tell them apart without a precise and explicit code of conduct applied accross the board? The right to remain silent must be about as old and set in stone as the theory of innocent until proven guilty. Would you prefer to erode the human rights of everyone to to ensure someone...anyone was convicted of every crime? The right to silence is relatively new actually. It was brought in to stop people accused of one thing from being asked to tell the police everything they had done wrong. It isn't about civil rights. If you have been asked about something you have done you should have to tell the police / authorities. Same as I don't believe in a criminals right to private conference with his lawyer either. Oh, and I thougt the principle "nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare" was quite old, but you are right it wasn't known among the Neanderthals... Just cos it's in Latin doesn't make it old. You can translate anything into latin. Yep, especially those nice do-gooders and civil right activists in the middle ages could. That's why it is found in loads of medieval legal text books. The right to own slaves was quite old too but we thought that was wrong. Just because anything is old doesn't mean it is good and proper. So let me get this right. It is ok for a person to stay silent about a murder or any criminal act they have witnessed or taken part in because to say something may embarass (sp) them. Or an innocent man can knowingly withhold evidence which would clear him quickly and save the tax payer money for the same reason?

Is that one question or two? How do you feel about criminals not accepting responsibility for their actions? Many people have been mistakenly labelled as criminals so I'm happy for the accused to continue protesting their innocene after being sentenced. How do you feel about criminals receiving light sentences for heinous crimes? I'm all for violent and corporate crimes having stricter sentences. How do you feel about criminals who don't accept responsibility for their actions receiving light sentences for heinous crimes? I don't think the perpetrators attitude should come into it at all. Again not actually looking at what I said. I said criminal. Actual guilty people not fessing up and easing the anguish of parents and loved ones. Again though, How do I know they're guilty? I'll go with a courts decision but if a defendent wants to continue to claim innocence that's their perogative. If you mean cases where someone admits guilt but refuses to co-operate in locating a corpse then gets released, I don't know of any case where that's happened. I didn't mention about them getting released.

Why is homophobic abuse ok, but not racist abuse? Or is racist abuse ok with you as well? Have you ever called someone a wanker?

There are 87 examples over the last decade. Shame you are blind to evidence mind ....... So would you put FF above the likes of Milan Madaric or Madejski? What about Tottenhams board? Bolton too is he better than their chairman?

Is that one question or two? How do you feel about criminals not accepting responsibility for their actions? Many people have been mistakenly labelled as criminals so I'm happy for the accused to continue protesting their innocene after being sentenced. How do you feel about criminals receiving light sentences for heinous crimes? I'm all for violent and corporate crimes having stricter sentences. How do you feel about criminals who don't accept responsibility for their actions receiving light sentences for heinous crimes? I don't think the perpetrators attitude should come into it at all. Again not actually looking at what I said. I said criminal. Actual guilty people not fessing up and easing the anguish of parents and loved ones.

How do you tell them apart without a precise and explicit code of conduct applied accross the board? The right to remain silent must be about as old and set in stone as the theory of innocent until proven guilty. Would you prefer to erode the human rights of everyone to to ensure someone...anyone was convicted of every crime? The right to silence is relatively new actually. It was brought in to stop people accused of one thing from being asked to tell the police everything they had done wrong. It isn't about civil rights. If you have been asked about something you have done you should have to tell the police / authorities. Same as I don't believe in a criminals right to private conference with his lawyer either. Oh, and I thougt the principle "nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare" was quite old, but you are right it wasn't known among the Neanderthals... Just cos it's in Latin doesn't make it old. You can translate anything into latin.

How do you tell them apart without a precise and explicit code of conduct applied accross the board? The right to remain silent must be about as old and set in stone as the theory of innocent until proven guilty. Would you prefer to erode the human rights of everyone to to ensure someone...anyone was convicted of every crime? The right to silence is relatively new actually. It was brought in to stop people accused of one thing from being asked to tell the police everything they had done wrong. It isn't about civil rights. If you have been asked about something you have done you should have to tell the police / authorities. Same as I don't believe in a criminals right to private conference with his lawyer either. so, anyone arrested is a criminal until proven innocent and they shouldn't have any fancy dan lawyer trying to keep everything above board while the honest (and institutionally racist btw) force get their confession? What a loony lefty I am thinking this is what we wanted to move away from. Do you want to go mis quote what I said some more. You could make up passages and put them in bold. I said Lawyer meetings shouldn't be private. The only reason this is allowed is so other illegal activity isn't found out and the lawyer gets more for winning a case. I also didn't mention innocent until proven guilty or vice versa either I just don't think you should be able to keep quiet about breaking the law if you are caught which these people have been BTW. So don't worry you're not a loony lefty. Just an idiot. I never mis quoted you at all, I didn't change so much as a comma. I was simply lampooning your suggestion that someone who's accused must be a criminal. Again that construes a misquote. Where do I say that all accused are criminals. Or suggest that? What I said was, anyone who is accused and is a criminal shouldn't be able to hide that fact. So how are you going to determine the criminal accused from the innocent accused and only allow the innocent ones their rights? Why does an innocent man need the right to silence? To protect a loved one? To avoid embarrassment? To Keep an affair hidden? To keep their job? Could be loads of reasons. Actually some of those are good arguments. How do you feel about criminals not accepting responsibility for their actions and receiving light sentences for heinous crimes?

All hail President Spongebob! Re unsterilisation: Vasectomies are reversible, although the success rate isn't brilliant. Anybody getting pregnant without license who cant pass the emergency test to face compulsory abortions / adoption orders.

How do you tell them apart without a precise and explicit code of conduct applied accross the board? The right to remain silent must be about as old and set in stone as the theory of innocent until proven guilty. Would you prefer to erode the human rights of everyone to to ensure someone...anyone was convicted of every crime? The right to silence is relatively new actually. It was brought in to stop people accused of one thing from being asked to tell the police everything they had done wrong. It isn't about civil rights. If you have been asked about something you have done you should have to tell the police / authorities. Same as I don't believe in a criminals right to private conference with his lawyer either. so, anyone arrested is a criminal until proven innocent and they shouldn't have any fancy dan lawyer trying to keep everything above board while the honest (and institutionally racist btw) force get their confession? What a loony lefty I am thinking this is what we wanted to move away from. Do you want to go mis quote what I said some more. You could make up passages and put them in bold. I said Lawyer meetings shouldn't be private. The only reason this is allowed is so other illegal activity isn't found out and the lawyer gets more for winning a case. I also didn't mention innocent until proven guilty or vice versa either I just don't think you should be able to keep quiet about breaking the law if you are caught which these people have been BTW. So don't worry you're not a loony lefty. Just an idiot. I never mis quoted you at all, I didn't change so much as a comma. I was simply lampooning your suggestion that someone who's accused must be a criminal. Again that construes a misquote. Where do I say that all accused are criminals. Or suggest that? What I said was, anyone who is accused and is a criminal shouldn't be able to hide that fact. So how are you going to determine the criminal accused from the innocent accused and only allow the innocent ones their rights? Why does an innocent man need the right to silence?

I have the start of don't want to miss a thing by aerosmith tattooed on the top of me arm with date i first met woor lass owt to say Hope you never split up / start hating aerosmith. By the way is an aerosmith an actual job title at Nestle? Did you win that comedy award then? Me taking part in comedy competitions is like me taking part in sex........... I always come last.

The bit with the breeze blocks is hilarious.

The Scottish are welcome to independence tbh, as long as they get their own currency, and support their own economy. The English would be having to do a Live Aid concert within a year just so you could feed yourselves. After taking control of their own oil I believe the Scottish may be able to fend for themselves. Of course Britain may be f*cked without the Scottish contingent in the army. You'll all be starving man. It'll be a third world country within a year. Oil will be the least of your concerns. Bit of a clue there. Reserves used up in a year once the vegetable oil ran out, trying to deep fry rats and stuff. That's when the concert would have to take place. I can just see them running the VT on the big screens at the concerts actually. Fields of desperately skinny people with their shellsuits hanging off them, lying on a sea of crushed Irn Bru cans, staring beseechingly into the cameras. Little stick legs emerging from dirty kilts. Or they could export their huge reserves of clean drinking water to the south of England. Nationalise the very lucrative spring water trades. Take advantage of the huge amounts of farm land available. Not to mention the alternative power surces available that Scotland could tap which the English don't want to. All of the above would require them actually working. Not gonna happen. Forgot about that bit. But a lot of queen worswhippers may bugger off to London and we can replace them with poles who seem to spend 24/7 working their arses off.

Aye. So what's it like. feel free to write you're own review. Average at best i'd say mate, unlike a Will Ferrell film there weren't many moments that had you howling so to speak. Poo! I was looking forward to it. May have to watch old school again.

The Scottish are welcome to independence tbh, as long as they get their own currency, and support their own economy. The English would be having to do a Live Aid concert within a year just so you could feed yourselves. After taking control of their own oil I believe the Scottish may be able to fend for themselves. Of course Britain may be f*cked without the Scottish contingent in the army. You'll all be starving man. It'll be a third world country within a year. Oil will be the least of your concerns. Bit of a clue there. Reserves used up in a year once the vegetable oil ran out, trying to deep fry rats and stuff. That's when the concert would have to take place. I can just see them running the VT on the big screens at the concerts actually. Fields of desperately skinny people with their shellsuits hanging off them, lying on a sea of crushed Irn Bru cans, staring beseechingly into the cameras. Little stick legs emerging from dirty kilts. Or they could export their huge reserves of clean drinking water to the south of England. Nationalise the very lucrative spring water trades. Take advantage of the huge amounts of farm land available. Not to mention the alternative power surces available that Scotland could tap which the English don't want to.

How do you tell them apart without a precise and explicit code of conduct applied accross the board? The right to remain silent must be about as old and set in stone as the theory of innocent until proven guilty. Would you prefer to erode the human rights of everyone to to ensure someone...anyone was convicted of every crime? The right to silence is relatively new actually. It was brought in to stop people accused of one thing from being asked to tell the police everything they had done wrong. It isn't about civil rights. If you have been asked about something you have done you should have to tell the police / authorities. Same as I don't believe in a criminals right to private conference with his lawyer either. so, anyone arrested is a criminal until proven innocent and they shouldn't have any fancy dan lawyer trying to keep everything above board while the honest (and institutionally racist btw) force get their confession? What a loony lefty I am thinking this is what we wanted to move away from. Do you want to go mis quote what I said some more. You could make up passages and put them in bold. I said Lawyer meetings shouldn't be private. The only reason this is allowed is so other illegal activity isn't found out and the lawyer gets more for winning a case. I also didn't mention innocent until proven guilty or vice versa either I just don't think you should be able to keep quiet about breaking the law if you are caught which these people have been BTW. So don't worry you're not a loony lefty. Just an idiot. I never mis quoted you at all, I didn't change so much as a comma. I was simply lampooning your suggestion that someone who's accused must be a criminal. Again that construes a misquote. Where do I say that all accused are criminals. Or suggest that? What I said was, anyone who is accused and is a criminal shouldn't be able to hide that fact.

The Scottish are welcome to independence tbh, as long as they get their own currency, and support their own economy. The English would be having to do a Live Aid concert within a year just so you could feed yourselves. After taking control of their own oil I believe the Scottish may be able to fend for themselves. Of course Britain may be f*cked without the Scottish contingent in the army. You'll all be starving man. It'll be a third world country within a year. Oil will be the least of your concerns. Bit of a clue there.

And yet the death rate due to speeding vehicles just keeps going up and up.

The Scottish are welcome to independence tbh, as long as they get their own currency, and support their own economy. The English would be having to do a Live Aid concert within a year just so you could feed yourselves. After taking control of their own oil I believe the Scottish may be able to fend for themselves. Of course Britain may be f*cked without the Scottish contingent in the army.

I have the start of don't want to miss a thing by aerosmith tattooed on the top of me arm with date i first met woor lass owt to say Hope you never split up / start hating aerosmith. By the way is an aerosmith an actual job title at Nestle?

Free condom-and-lube packs that you can generally get in your local friendly poofy haunt somewhere in the Pink Triangle. Actually, while I wasn't exactly serious about handing them out on street corners or what-have-you, making free contraception available to all, and particularly those who need it the most (or need a kid the least), would certainly make it into my manifesto somewhere. I had a walk down Canal street in Manchester on Monday as it happens. Wasn't the gay Mecca I had expected, I have to say. One thing that used to annoy me was pubs with novelty condoms in. Sometimes, all they would sell were ones that didn't frigging work! The Strawberry was a case in point iirc. What kind of alcy idiot wants to suck a whisky flavoured cock?

How do you tell them apart without a precise and explicit code of conduct applied accross the board? The right to remain silent must be about as old and set in stone as the theory of innocent until proven guilty. Would you prefer to erode the human rights of everyone to to ensure someone...anyone was convicted of every crime? The right to silence is relatively new actually. It was brought in to stop people accused of one thing from being asked to tell the police everything they had done wrong. It isn't about civil rights. If you have been asked about something you have done you should have to tell the police / authorities. Same as I don't believe in a criminals right to private conference with his lawyer either. so, anyone arrested is a criminal until proven innocent and they shouldn't have any fancy dan lawyer trying to keep everything above board while the honest (and institutionally racist btw) force get their confession? What a loony lefty I am thinking this is what we wanted to move away from. Do you want to go mis quote what I said some more. You could make up passages and put them in bold. I said Lawyer meetings shouldn't be private. The only reason this is allowed is so other illegal activity isn't found out and the lawyer gets more for winning a case. I also didn't mention innocent until proven guilty or vice versa either I just don't think you should be able to keep quiet about breaking the law if you are caught which these people have been BTW. So don't worry you're not a loony lefty. Just an idiot.

1 more controlled imigration 2 withdraw all funding for and tax relief related to faith schools 3 re visit human rights in relation to religion and those convicted of criminal acts 4 sterilisation for repeat offenders unemployable/ mentally unstable. 5 super duper duper tax for footballers.

How do you tell them apart without a precise and explicit code of conduct applied accross the board? The right to remain silent must be about as old and set in stone as the theory of innocent until proven guilty. Would you prefer to erode the human rights of everyone to to ensure someone...anyone was convicted of every crime? The right to silence is relatively new actually. It was brought in to stop people accused of one thing from being asked to tell the police everything they had done wrong. It isn't about civil rights. If you have been asked about something you have done you should have to tell the police / authorities. Same as I don't believe in a criminals right to private conference with his lawyer either.

Now that Deadly Doug isn't a chairman. WHo is the fat one better than now? And give evidence for your answer.