Kevin Carr's Gloves

It's the reason I am in Jockville.

Yeah, 'cos 15 year-olds spend their weekends playing with Barbie dolls, don't they. Not condoning what he did, like, but I hardly think she would have had any innocence to rob. 54114[/snapback] Sorry but you sound exactly like you are condoning what he did. Who are you to decide what innocence is?

My only problem with this is we aren't in court. We have to rely on Journalists and they are the 2nd bottom rung on the evolutionary c*nt ladder. Just above lawyers and just below expert testifiers.

You seem desperate to hang this girl Rob. Is she an old girlfriend who dumped you or something?

Sorry LM, but that just comes across as somebody who is pissed off that we won yesterday. Yes Owen's goals are doing good for us - that's his fuckin' job - but how many has he created on his own? Probably none from what I can think. That means it is the team who are creating things for him - something that indicates they are doing something right. 'Owen's goals' implies that without them we would struggle. Yes, that's correct but what about other teams who rely heavily on a certain striker, such as Arsenal and Manure? Once Henry and Van Horse stop scoring, things aren't just as they should be - no different from us. We are just coming out of an injury problem of fuckin' gargantuan proportions imo and only now will we be able to tell how things really are with our team. I still suspect Souness is the wrong man for the job, but it is only now that we will be able to judge properly. I know, we all do , you're opininion of Souness but, as I said, that post you made just sounded sour grapes to me. Maybe it is just me, but it sounded like a really negative post just to keep your anti-Souness stance on track. 51373[/snapback] It is well documented I am anti Souness. We played well yesterday 2nd half and if we played like that more we could move up the league. My main itch is everybody saying judge Souness when everyone is fit. My problem is that you don't judge leaders on what they do during the good times. You judge leaders on what they do during the difficult times.

http://uk.sports.yahoo.com/051029/4/em7k.html

Same tired old bollocks as well....allegedly http://www.forestonline.org/output/page22.asp 50866[/snapback] However when taking into consideration the implications you cant take tax into as if you didn't spend on Cigarettes you would have more money to spend on other things without negative health effects but which also contain tax.

Someone on this thread must be able to tell me the train times from East Kilbride to Penzance.

Basta*ds downstairs did that and the wife wouldn't let me confront them due to my recent anger issue. So when I had a day off by meself I soldered their lock up. They've moved now.

I wouldnt cross the road to piss on him if he was on fire. I went to a radio 1 quiz night in Glasgow and he was doing the djing after. He just stood there while someone did the mixxing and he just f*cked about being a c*ck. Sorry for the language but I am at work and someone started me on Jaouquin Phoenix.

50851[/snapback] Takes one of us Scots to sort out the real story while you English scum flap about in the dark.

It would be nice to see some figures on that, if I was to take it literally then smoking does not cause all 'smoking related illnesses'. I also don't see that it all comes down to money, we should only take out of the community exactly what we put into it? If you think George Best should die for his sins that's one thing but does that extend to every smoker and drinker? As I said earlier, where do we draw the line, should you be left to die without treatment if you are involved in an accident whilst parachite jumping or if you're involved in a car accident driving 5 miles per hour over the speed limit? 50295[/snapback] I wasnt saying that. I was replying to SCUM who was being high and mighty about the amount of money he pays in taxes on cigarettes.

Makosi.

I think you are quite right, Steve. It's unbelievable that people who smoke and drink should expect you to treat them when they get related problems. After all it's not like they've ever contributed to the health service is it? If you are just going to go through the motions though it does seem a little a bit of a waste of your valuable time. Maybe we could compromise? You give me back every penny of the taxation from my daily packet of fags for 35 years and my booze and then I'll go and get private treatment with the money. Sounds a good deal to me? After you've repaid all us smokers & drinkers our extra taxation though don't be suprised if you don't have a job, or even a health service left. 50283[/snapback] Tired old factually incorrect argument. All of the tax gathered from smokers will never cover the medical costs of treating same for smopking related diseases. Not taking into consideration the outlay for non smokers suffering from second hand smoke and the asthma treatments for children born to smoking parents. or the millions spent on premature baby clinics for babies born to drinking mothers. I am glad the old c*nt is dying. he is a wife beating sh*t. or maybe that is a "disease" too. P.S I dont think of alcoholism as a disease or you wouldn't be able to beat it without prescription medication like millions have in the past. 50290[/snapback] The bit about prescription drugs is wrong like. I overcame the cold last week without taking paracetamol. I think that can be classified as a disease. 50291[/snapback] I believe it is more of a viral infection.

I think you are quite right, Steve. It's unbelievable that people who smoke and drink should expect you to treat them when they get related problems. After all it's not like they've ever contributed to the health service is it? If you are just going to go through the motions though it does seem a little a bit of a waste of your valuable time. Maybe we could compromise? You give me back every penny of the taxation from my daily packet of fags for 35 years and my booze and then I'll go and get private treatment with the money. Sounds a good deal to me? After you've repaid all us smokers & drinkers our extra taxation though don't be suprised if you don't have a job, or even a health service left. 50283[/snapback] Tired old factually incorrect argument. All of the tax gathered from smokers will never cover the medical costs of treating same for smopking related diseases. Not taking into consideration the outlay for non smokers suffering from second hand smoke and the asthma treatments for children born to smoking parents. or the millions spent on premature baby clinics for babies born to drinking mothers. I am glad the old c*nt is dying. he is a wife beating sh*t. or maybe that is a "disease" too. P.S I dont think of alcoholism as a disease or you wouldn't be able to beat it without prescription medication like millions have in the past.

Heartiest congrats. I am trying to get the missus up the duff as well. Not at this present moment you understand I can't multi task.

Right according to that all we have to do is lure Souness down to York (but not on a Sunday) and we can be rid of him in minutes without having to pay a dismissal charge.. Brilliant!!!!!!

Can't see it being Martin O'Neil he played for Northern Ireland. Hope it's O'Dreary would rule him out of our job.

After watching Craig Moore for Rangers I would say Douglas Bader could do a better job.

Or Shola. You know I had such high hopes for Shola. Why has he become so crap?

It's Buffoon I don't think anyone really wants us to lose. I think some of us are just so disheartened we dont think we are going to win and are just getting our excuses in early so if the miracle does happen and they win we won't feel so bad.

On a brighter note my friends at the Irish FA got me a card from Liam O'Brien which he has worte "From the man who put the ball in the Mackems net".

It's not just his team selections and use of substitutes. It's the fact we can't string more than 3 passes together. Why is he not working on that. And if he is why is it not making any difference. I aslo understand we were unlucky today. However we were playing Wigan FFS how old is their defence. Kavanagh was ancient when he played for STOKE yes STOKE. Why couldnt we get a better organised attack going. These are the reasons Souness should go not because of bad luck but bad management and coaching.

I agree, i'd have him out as well, but that was three massive decisions, one definite goal and two pens which are likely goals, that i'm afraid makes the officials the main factor in the game and that is a sad state of affairs. And it clear when you watch teams like Wigan you see the benefit of good coaching, organisation, motivation, training and fitness to get the best out of your squad of players, something we lack. But if anybody could ever be arsed to watch all of our games on tape over a season you will find an almighty difference between the ammount of shite decisions against us than for us. 46216[/snapback] I think if you watched all our games from last season to this you would just be amazed by the amount of shite.

Is that an Abu Hamza handful.